Urolithiasis: Modern Approaches to Classification, Diagnosis and Treatment
Authors/Creators
- 1. Bogomolets National Medical University, Ukraine
Description
Urinary stone disease (USD) is the most common and progressive disease of the urinary system, which is characterized by frequent exacerbations and a severe course. This is a complex disease caused by various causes, in which several biochemical processes are involved, occurring not only in the urinary system, but also in the whole organism. USD depends on geographical, climatic, ethnic, dietary and genetic factors. Over the past 20 years there has been an increase prevalence of this disease.
The course of USD is characterized by the acute and chronic pyelonephritis and frequent recurrence, which leads to the development of renal failure, disability and fatal consequences.
Calculus can form de novo anywhere in the urinary tract. The pathophysiology of USD differs depending on the place of stone formation and depends on endogenous and exogenous factors. Urinary tract stones are classified depending on etiology, location, size, number, frequency of occurrence, and radiopacity.
The main symptoms of USD are pain of various nature; microscopic hematuria; dysuria, which most often indicates the presence of a stone in the urinary bladder or a low location in the ureters; discharge of crystals of urinary salts or concretions; increased body temperature.
The diagnosis of USD is based on a carefully history taking and physical examination, which allows to determine the correct direction of diagnostic approach, which include laboratory and instrumental methods of diagnosis.
Ultrasound diagnosis is used as the main method for visualization of calculi, but recently non contrast-enhanced computed tomography has become the standard for the diagnosis of acute low back pain, replacing intravenous urography.
The choice of treatment is based on many parameters, such as the number, size, morphology, shape, volume, mobility, hardness and location of the stones and is individualized for each patient. There are two main approaches: conservative treatment and surgic al one.
Medicinal treatment of USD is used primarily to prevent the repeated formation of new stones or to increase those inclusions that are already present in the organs. Drug therapy is carried out with the aim of normalizing processes in the body, the failure of which leads to the development of pathology. However, conservative treatment has its limitations and is most often used as a symptomatic treatment. Open laparoscopic interventions are rarely used recently, minimally invasive methods are more popular: extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy; ureterorenoscopy; percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Taking into account the increase in the prevalence of USD in Ukraine and disability (the third place among the general spectrum of causes of disability in urological practice), the article analyzes and reviews modern approaches to classification, early and accurate diagnosis, and choosing a timely and correct method of treatment.
Files
Urolithiasis_Modern_Approaches_to_Classification_Diagnosis_and_Treatment.pdf
Files
(1.7 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:f7e8368a896a0fd8823a916a5c35b9af
|
1.7 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Pasechnikov SP, Vozianov SO, Lisovy VM, Kostev FI, Lyulko OO, Sarychev LP, et al. Urology: National textbook for students of higher medical educational institutions of the IV level of accreditation. Vinnytsia: New Book; 2013. 422 p.
- Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Knoll T. EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):475–82. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041.
- Parmar MS. Kidney stones. BMJ. 2004;328(7453):1420–4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7453.1420.
- Ilyuk I. Urolithiasis [Internet]. 2018. Available from: http://vipusknik.bsmu.edu.ua/news/sechokam%E2%80%99yana-khvoroba.
- Pearle MS, Goldfarb DS, Assimos DG, Curhan G, Denu-Ciocca CJ, Matlaga BR, et al. Medical management of kidney stones: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2014;192(2):316–24. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.05.006.
- Pasechnikov SP, Sheremet RZ. Urinary stone disease: modern principles of patient management. Med Aspects Men's Health. 2016:12–20.
- Chhiber N, Sharma M, Kaur T, Singla S. Mineralization in health and mechanism of kidney stone formation. Int J Pharm Science Invention. 2014;3:25–31.
- Aggarwal KP, Narula S, Kakkar M, Tandon C. Nephrolithiasis: molecular mechanism of renal stone formation and the critical role played by modulators. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:292953. doi: 10.1155/2013/292953.
- Ennis JL, Asplin JR. The role of the 24-h urine collection in the management of nephrolithiasis. Int J Surg. 2016;36(Pt D):633–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.11.020.
- Gottlieb M, Long B, Koyfman A. The evaluation and management of urolithiasis in the ED: A review of the literature. Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36(4):699–706. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.003.
- Cunningham P, Noble H, Al-Modhefer AK, Walsh I. Kidney stones: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Br J Nurs. 2016;25(20):1112–6. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2016.25.20.1112. PMID: 27834524.
- Shoag J, Tasian GE, Goldfarb DS, Eisner BH. The new epidemiology of nephrolithiasis. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2015;22(4):273–8. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2015.04.004.
- Ingimarsson JP, Krambeck AE, Pais VM Jr. Diagnosis and Management of Nephrolithiasis. Surg Clin North Am. 2016;96(3):517–32. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2016.02.008.
- Kalwar SR, Mahar N, Lal M, Memon MM, Qureshi HH, Hussain M. Evaluation of predictive factors of renal function recovery in renal failure secondary to urinary tract obstruction. J Pak Med Assoc. 2023;73(6):1203–06. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.6339.
- Alelign T, Petros B. Kidney Stone Disease: An Update on Current Concepts. Adv Urol. 2018;2018:3068365. doi: 10.1155/2018/3068365.
- Antonelli JA, Maalouf NM, Pearle MS, Lotan Y. Use of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to calculate the impact of obesity and diabetes on cost and prevalence of urolithiasis in 2030. Eur Urol. 2014;66(4):724–9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.036.
- Almomani EY, Jarrar W, Alhadid A, Hamadneh L, Qablan A, Almomani HY. Shedding light on pharmacists' knowledge of kidney stones' etiology and treatment. Pharm Pract (Granada). 2022;20(3):2712. doi: 10.18549/Pharm-Pract.2022.3.2712.
- Nagendra V, Dhande R, Mishra G, Reddy NG, Gowda H. Hematuria as a Sign of Kidney Stone Disease Evaluated Using Computed Tomography: A Review. Cureus. 2023;15(4):e38064. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38064.
- Salinawati B, Hing EY, Fam XI, Zulfiqar MA. Accuracy of ultrasound versus computed tomography urogram in detecting urinary tract calculi. Med J Malaysia. 2015;70(4):238–42.
- Fisang C, Anding R, Müller SC, Latz S, Laube N. Urolithiasis – an interdisciplinary diagnostic, therapeutic and secondary preventive challenge. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112(6):83–91. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0083.
- Pathan SA, Mitra B, Straney LD, Afzal MS, Anjum S, Shukla D, et al. Delivering safe and effective analgesia for management of renal colic in the emergency department: a double-blind, multigroup, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10032):1999–2007. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8.
- Pathan SA, Mitra B, Cameron PA. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Comparing the Efficacy of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs, Opioids, and Paracetamol in the Treatment of Acute Renal Colic. Eur Urol. 2018;73(4):583–595. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.11.001.
- Safaie A, Tavoli M, Babaniamansour S, Aliniagerdroudbari E, Mousavi A, Sotoodehnia M, et al. Intravenous morphine plus ibuprofen or ketorolac versus intravenous morphine alone in reducing renal colic pain intensity in emergency department: A randomized, doubleblind clinical trial. Turk J Emerg Med. 2022;22(1):8–14. doi: 10.4103/2452-2473.336108.
- Heers H, Stay D, Wiesmann T, Hofmann R. Urolithiasis in Germany: Trends from the National DRG Database. Urol Int. 2022;106(6):589–95. doi: 10.1159/000520372.
- Chen K, Mi H, Xu G, Liu L, Sun X, Wang S, Meng Q, Lv T. The Efficacy and Safety of Tamsulosin Combined with Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Urolithiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Endourol. 2015;29(10):1166–76. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0098.
- Dasgupta R, Cameron S, Aucott L, MacLennan G, Thomas RE, Kilonzo MM, et al. Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Ureteroscopic Treatment as Therapeutic Interventions for Stones of the Ureter (TISU): A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Non-inferiority Trial. Eur Urol. 2021;80(1):46–54. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.02.044.
- Cui X, Ji F, Yan H, Ou TW, Jia CS, He XZ, Gao W, Wang Q, Cui B, Wu JT. Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones: a meta-analysis. Urology. 2015;85(4):748–56. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.11.041.
- Tzelves L, Geraghty R, Mourmouris P, Chatzikrachtis N, Karavitakis M, Somani B, et al. Shockwave Lithotripsy Complications According to Modified Clavien-Dindo Grading System. A Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis in a Sample of 115 Randomized Controlled Trials. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(5):1452–60. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.11.002.
- Ayoub EM, Bourgi A, Alsouki J, Merhej S, Conort P. Fluoroless endourological surgery for high burden renal and proximal ureteric stones: A safe technique for experienced surgeons. Arab J Urol. 2021;19(4):438–44. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2021.1901357.
- Drake T, Grivas N, Dabestani S, Knoll T, Lam T, Maclennan S, et al. What are the Benefits and Harms of Ureteroscopy Compared with Shock-wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Stones? A Systematic Review. Eur Urol. 2017;72(5):772–86. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.016.
- Santiago JE, Hollander AB, Soni SD, Link RE, Mayer WA. To Dust or Not To Dust: a Systematic Review of Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy Techniques. Curr Urol Rep. 2017;18(4):32. doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0677-8.
- Geraghty R, Abourmarzouk O, Rai B, Biyani CS, Rukin NJ, Somani BK. Evidence for Ureterorenoscopy and Laser Fragmentation (URSL) for Large Renal Stones in the Modern Era. Curr Urol Rep. 2015;16(8):54. doi: 10.1007/s11934-015-0529-3.
- Kumar A, Kumar N, Vasudeva P, Kumar Jha S, Kumar R, Singh H. A prospective, randomized comparison of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery and miniperc for treatment of 1 to 2 cm radiolucent lower calyceal renal calculi: a single center experience. J Urol. 2015;193(1):160–4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.088.
- Cordes J, Sommerauer M, Laturnus JM, Jocham D. Accidental destruction of stone trapping baskets: new knowledge on the interaction of baskets, stone trapping devices, guide wires and lithotriptors – a brief review. Aktuel Urol. 2013;44(4):277–9. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1345204.
- Kronenberg P, Hameed BZ, Somani B. Outcomes of thulium fibre laser for treatment of urinary tract stones: results of a systematic review. Curr Opin Urol. 2021;31(2):80–6. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000853.
- Martov AG, Ergakov DV, Guseynov M, Andronov AS, Plekhanova OA. Clinical Comparison of Super Pulse Thulium Fiber Laser and High-Power Holmium Laser for Ureteral Stone Management. J Endourol. 2021;35(6):795–800. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0581.
- Lv J, Wang N, Zhu Y, Luo Q, Li Y, Li J. A meta-analysis and systematic review of holmium laser treatment of bladder stones. Transl Androl Urol. 2021;10(8):3465–75. doi: 10.21037/tau-21-563.
- Ercil H, Altunkol A, Alma E, Goren MR, Sener NC, Kuyucu F, et al. Comparison of Ho:Yag laser and pneumatic lithotripsy combined with transurethral prostatectomy in high burden bladder stones with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Asian J Surg. 2016;39(4):238–42. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2015.03.010.
- Rodríguez D, Sacco DE. Minimally invasive surgical treatment for kidney stone disease. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2015;22(4):266–72. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2015.03.005.
- Shahat AA, Kamel AA, Taha TM, Abonnoor AEI, Reda A, Faddan AA, et al. A randomised trial comparing transurethral to percutaneous cystolithotripsy in boys. BJU Int. 2022;130(2):254–61. doi: 10.1111/bju.15693.
- Patel SR, Nakada SY. The modern history and evolution of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2015;29(2):153–7. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0287.