Published August 31, 2020 | Version v1
Figure Open

Fig. 2 in Ecological fitting: Chemical profiles of plant hosts provide insights on selection cues and preferences for a major buprestid pest

  • 1. ∗ & Department of Biological Sciences, Wright State University, 3640, Colonel Glenn Highway, 203 Biological Sciences I, Dayton, OH, USA & ∗ & Current Institution: Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, 14 College Farm Road, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA

Description

Fig. 2. Ordination (nonmetric multidimensional scaling) plots of volatiles profiles of black ash (BA, Fraxinus nigra), blue ash (Blue, F. quadrangulata), Manchurian ash (MA, F. mandshurica), olive (OL, Olea europaea), and white fringetree (WF, Chionanthus virginicus), five plant hosts of emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis). a) Overall plant profiles, b) Green leaf volatile (GLV) profiles, c) monoterpene profiles, d) sesquiterpene profiles, and e) antennally active compounds. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Notes

Published as part of Peterson, Donnie L., Böröczky, Katalin, Tumlinson, James & Cipollini, Don, 2020, Ecological fitting: Chemical profiles of plant hosts provide insights on selection cues and preferences for a major buprestid pest, pp. 1-11 in Phytochemistry (112397) 176 on page 5, DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2020.112397, http://zenodo.org/record/8295646

Files

figure.png

Files (2.6 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:4c0bb27a3d576554d87aa59505ed5056
2.6 MB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Related works

Is part of
Journal article: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2020.112397 (DOI)
Journal article: urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:F15AFFC39A2FC04F2E66FFD1FFAFFF89 (LSID)
Journal article: https://zenodo.org/record/8295646 (URL)