China and Latin America: Mutual benefits or asymmetric relationship?
Description
With China’s rapid growth, it is worth considering whether or not the country has challenged the United States, which for decades was the hegemonic power in much of Latin America. Posed in international studies, these questions are viewed from a Western perspective, arguably ethnocentric and universalist, which understands the international context as one of allies and enemies, center and periphery. Thus, it is difficult to understand a global rearrangement involving a non-Western actor. There seems to be no other way of understanding peaceful coexistence without involving the dominant and dominated relationship. Therefore, this paper seeks to explain whether a strategic relationship, fostered based on equal relationships for mutual benefit, is possible, without thinking about the soft or strong power notion that characterized the international order of the 20th Century. For the approach, a qualitative analytical-descriptive methodology is used.
Files
document.pdf
Files
(845.6 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:c85d3e613d29b82ee143c0856266689a
|
845.6 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Acharya, A. (2014). Global international relations (IR) and regional worlds. International Studies Quarterly, 58(4), 647-659. doi:10.1111/isqu.12171
- Acharya, A. (2011). "Dialogue and Discovery: In search of International Relations Theory beyond the West''. Millenium, 619-637.
- Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2010). Conclusion: On the possibility of a non-Western international relations theory. London/ New York: Routledge.
- Armillas-Tiseyra, M. (2014). "Introduction: Dislocations." The Global South 7 (2): 2-10. Chan, G. (1998). International Studies in China: An Annotated Bibliography. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
- Chamorro, A. (2008). El proceso de reforma económica de China y su adhesión a la OMC. Pecvnia: Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de León, (7), 257-284.
- Connelly, M. (1989). La política exterior de China: 1978-1987. Estudios de Asia y África, (24), (82-103).
- Cordeiro, M., & Paulino, L.A. (2017). Reflexiones sobre la hegemonía y la política internacional de China: la iniciativa "Cinturon y Ruta" como una estrategia de desarrollo pacífico. Relaciones Internacionales, 53, 207-238.
- De Jesús, T. (2019), La influencia del confucianismo en la cultura política y el desarrollo económico en China y el Este de Asia actual: lecciones para México, México, Plaza y Valdés Editores.
- Dupuy, H.A., & Margueliche, M. (2018). El sistema de Tianxia como modelo de (nueva) globalización para revertir la idea del no mundo. El caso de la nueva ruta de la seda China. X Jornadas de Sociología de la UNLP. http://jornadassociologia.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/x- jornadas/actas/DupuyMarguelichePONMesa09.pdf/view?searchterm=None
- Heath, T. R. (2014). China's New Governing Party Paradigm: Political Renewal and the Pursuit of National Rejuvenation. London, UK: Routledge.
- Jinping, X. (2017). Discurso de Xi Jinping en la ceremonia de apertura del Foro Internacional "Una franja, una ruta". China, Beijing.
- Ling, L. (2014) The dao of world politics Towards a post-Westphalian, worldist International Relations. London/ New York: Routledge.
- Margueliche, J.C. (2019). El sistema de Tianxia y el sueño chino como plataformas teóricas- discursivas para la construcción de legitimidad en la nueva ruta de la seda de China. Razón Crítica, 7, 25 -52, doi: 10.21789/25007807.1440
- Montobbio, M. (2018). Tianxia, teoría de las relaciones internacionales y ascenso global de China. Revista Española de Derecho Internacional, 70(1), 235-244, http://dx.doi.org/10.17103/redi.70.1.2018.2a.02
- Pedraja, D (1976). Los Principios rectores de la política exterior de China. Foro Internacional, volume] (63), (350- 379). https://forointernacional.colmex.mx/index.php/fi/article/view/734/724
- Qin, Y. (2011a).Why is there no Chinese international relations theory? International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Volume 7, Issue 3, September 2007, Pages 313–340, https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcm013
- Qin, Y. (2011).Development of International Relations theory in China: progress through debate. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific Vol. 11 No. 2, pages 231–257, https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcr003
- Qin, Y. (2012). Culture and global thought: Chinese international theory in the making. Revista Cidob d'Afers Internacionals, (100), 67-90, https://www.cidob.org/en/articulos/revista_cidob_d_afers_internacionals/100/culture_and_global_thought_chinese_international_theory_in_the_making
- Rocha, M. (2006). China en transformación: la doctrina del desarrollo pacífico. Foro Internacional, (4) 693-719.
- Rodríguez, M. (2016). La evolución de la política exterior de China. Revista Iberoamericana de Humanidades y Relaciones Internacionales, 18 (35), 302-318. https://revistascientificas.us.es/index.php/araucaria/article/view/2677/2250
- Saiz, J. (2009). La Organización De Cooperación De Shangai (Ocs): Claves Para La Creación De Un Futuro Líder Mundial. Revista de Economía Mundial, (23),307-326. ISSN: 1576-0162. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=866/86612461015
- Tickner; A., & Blaney, D. (2012) International Relations Scholarship Around the World. Bogotá, Universidad de los Andes, and Denmark, University of Copenhagen.
- Vidales, A. (2016). La nueva ruta de la seda y el resurgimiento geopolítico de China. Instituto Español de Estudios Estratégicos. http://www. ieee.es/Galerias/fichero/docs_opinion/2016/DIEEEO78-2016_RutaSeda_ geopoliticaChina_AdrianVidales.pdf
- Xuetong, Y. (2011) Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power. Princeton, The Princeton China Series.
- Xue, L. (2006) 'Zhongguo Jiangou Zhuyi Guoji Guanxi Yajiu: Chengjiu yu Buzu (Constructivism in China: achievements and shortcomings)', in Y. Qin (ed.), Culture and International Society: A Study of Constructivism in International Relations, pp. 166–204. Beijing: World Affairs Press.
- Yan, X. (2014). From keeping a low profile to striving for achievement. The Chinese Journal for International Politics, 7(2), 153-184.
- Yaqing, Q. (2012). Cultura y pensamiento global: una teoría china de las relaciones internacionales/Culture and global thought: Chinese international theory in the making. Revista CIDOB D'Afers Internacionals, 67-90.
- Zhang, B. (2015a). Chinese Perceptions of US Return to Southeast Asia and the Prospect of China's Peaceful Rise. Journal of Contemporary China, 24(91), 176-195.
- Zhao, T. (2009) A Political World Philosophy in terms of All-under-heaven (Tianxia). Diogenes, 56(1), 5-18, https://doi.org/10.1177/0392192109102149
- Zemin, J. (2002) Texto íntegro del informe de Juan Zemin en el XVI Congreso del PCCh. http://spanish.china.org.cn/spanish/50593.htm.