Science and pseudoscience - Falsifiability
Description
The delimitation between science and pseudoscience is part of the more general task of determining which beliefs are epistemologically justified. Standards for demarcation may vary by domain, but several basic principles are universally accepted.
Karl Popper proposed falsifiability as an important criterion in distinguishing between science and pseudoscience. He argues that verification and confirmation can play no role in formulating a satisfactory criterion of demarcation. Instead, it proposes that scientific theories be distinguished from non-scientific theories by testable claims that future observations might reveal to be false.
Files
Science-Pseudoscience-Falsifiability-C.pdf
Files
(197.8 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:b4bae106d4dfbf6a9d1090832917d51a
|
197.8 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Gleberzon, William. 1984. "Academic Freedom and Holocaust Denial Literature: Dealing with Infamy." Interchange on Education.
- Grove, J W. 1985. "Rationality at Risk: Science Against Pseudoscience." ResearchGate. 1985. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11730117_Rationality_at_Risk_Science_Against_Pseudoscience.
- Hansson, Sven Ove. 1996. "Defining Pseudo-Science." Philosophia Naturalis 33 (1): 169–176.