Implications of Finite Element Analysis in Orthodontics.
Authors/Creators
- 1. PG Student
- 2. Professor & Head,
- 3. Reader
- 4. Professor
- 5. Senior lecturer
Description
Background- Orthodontics, a branch of dentistry focused on realigning teeth, has benefited from the application of Finite Element Analysis (FEA). FEA is a computational method that calculates stress and displacement within structures under specific loads. In orthodontics, FEA has been used to analyze the biomechanical effects of treatment methods and understand bone remodeling. This article provides an overview of FEA in orthodontics, discussing its fundamentals and outlining the steps involved in the process. FEA allows for accurate quantification of stress and strain patterns in the periodontal ligament, bone, and tooth structures, contributing to improved understanding and precision in orthodontic treatment. Computed Tomography (CT) scans are used to generate FEA models, and morphological analysis provides insights into the characteristics of dental structures. FEA is also used to study bone remodeling and dentofacial orthopaedics. However, FEA has limitations, including the need for careful modeling and the cost involved. Overall, FEA has proven to be a valuable tool in orthodontics, enhancing treatment planning and providing insights into the biomechanics of tooth movement and bone remodeling. Conclusion- Finite Element Analysis (FEA) is a powerful tool in orthodontics that allows for the accurate quantification of stress and strain patterns in the teeth, periodontal ligament, and bone structures during orthodontic tooth movement. It provides valuable insights into the structural behavior of teeth and helps improve treatment planning and outcomes. While FEA has its limitations and should be complemented by clinical trials, its application in orthodontics holds great promise for advancing evidence-based practices and customized treatment approaches.
Files
IMPLICATIONS OF FINITE.pdf
Files
(1.6 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:25439d0426eb7425b81f9766a142bb57
|
1.6 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- 1) Abu, A. R., Rashid, K., and Voyiadjis, G. Z. A finite strain plastic-damage model for high velocity impact using combined viscosity and gradient localization limiters: Part I-theoretical formulation. International Journal of DamageMechanics, 2006; 15(4):293. 2) Adachi, T., Tsubota, K., Tomita, Y., and Hollister, S. J. Trabecular surface remodeling simulation for cancellous bone usingmicrostructural voxel finite elementmodels. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 2001: 123(5):403-409. 3) Sarmah A, Mathur AK, Gupta V, Pai VS, Nandini S. Finite element analysis of dental implant as orthodontic anchorage. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2011;12:259-64. 4) Akhtar, R.,Daymond,M. R., Almer, J. D., andMummery, P.M. Elastic strains in antler trabecular bone determined by synchrotron X-ray diffraction. Acta Biomaterialia, 2008:4 (6):1677-1687. 5) Ammar, H. H., Ngan, P., Crout, R. J., Mucino, V. H., and Mukdadi, O. M. Threedimensional modeling and finite element analysis in treatment planning for orthodontic tooth movement. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2011:139(1):e59–e71 6) Shaw AM, Sameshima GT, Vu HV. Mechanical stress generated by orthodontic forces on apical root cementum: a finite element model. Orthod Craniofacial Res. 2004;7(2):98-107. 7) Jones ML, Hickman J, Middleton J, Knox J, Volp C. A validated finite element method study of orthodontic tooth movement in the human subject. Am J Orthod. 2001;28(1):29-38. 8) Bailon-Plaza, A. and Van Der Meulen, M. A mathematical framework to study the effects of growth factor influences on fracture healing. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2001:212(2):191-209 9) Aversa, R., Apicella, D., Perillo, L., Sorrentino, R., Zarone, F., Ferrari, M., and Apicella, A. Non-linear elastic three-dimensional finite element analysis on the effect of endocrown material rigidity on alveolar bone remodeling process. Dental Materials, 2009:25(5):678-690. 10) Bagge, M. A model of bone adaptation as an optimization process. Journal of Biomechanics, 2000:33(11):1349-1357. 11) Bailon-Plaza, A. and Van Der Meulen, M. A mathematical framework to study the effects of growth factor influences on fracture healing. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2001:212(2):191-209. 12) Baïotto, S. and Zidi, M. Un modèle viscoélastique de remodelage osseux : approche unidimensionnelle. Comptes Rendus deMécanique, 2004:332(8):pp. 633-638. 13) Beaupré, G. S. and Hayes, W. C. Finite element analysis of a threedimensional opencelledmodel for trabecular bone. Journal of biomechanical engineering, 1985:107:249. 14) Beaupré, G. S., Orr, T. E., and Carter, D. R. An approach for timedependent bone modeling and remodeling-theoretical development. Journal of Orthopedic Research, 1990:8 (5):651-661. 15) Committee, A. I.H. ASMHandbook: Properties and selection, volume 2. ASMInternational, 1990. 16) Cowin, S.C. Themechanical and stress adaptive properties of bone. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 1983:11(3-4):263-295. 17) Cowin, S.C. Themechanical and stress adaptive properties of bone. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 1983:11(3-4):263-295. 18) Cowin, S.C. and Nachlinger, R. Bone remodeling III: uniqueness and stability in adaptive elasticity theory. Journal of Elasticity, 1978:V8(3):285-295. 19) Currey, J. Strain rate dependence of themechanical properties of reindeer antler and the cumulative damage model of bone fracture. Journal of Biomechanics, 1989:22(5):469– 475. 20) De Giorgi, M., Carofalo, A., Dattoma, V., Nobile, R., and Palano, F. Aluminiumfoams structuralmodelling. Computers & Structures, 2010:88(1-2):25-35. 21) Desmorat, R. and Otin, S. Crossidentification isotropic/anisotropic damage and application to anisothermal structural failure. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2008:75(11): 3446-3463. 22) Dizier, A. Caractérisation des effets de température dans la zone endommagée autour de tunnels de stockage de déchets nucléaires dans des roches argileuses. PhD thesis, Université de Liège - Faculté de Sciences Appliquées - ArgEnCo, 2011. 23) Doblaré, M. and García, J.-M. Application of an anisotropic boneremodellingmodel based on a damagerepair theory to the analysis of the proximal femur before and after total hip replacement. Journal of Biomechanics, 2001:34:1157-1170. 24) Frost, H. Bone "mass" and the "mechanostat": a proposal. The anatomical record, 1987; 219 (1):1-9. 25) Gal, J. A., Gallo, L. M., Palla, S., Murray, G., and Klineberg, I. Analysis of human mandibular mechanics based on screw theory and in vivo data. Journal of Biomechanics, 2004;37(9):1405-1412.