The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array II. Customised pulsar noise models for spatially correlated gravitational waves
-
Antoniadis, J.1
- Arumugam, P.2
-
Arumugam, S.3
-
Babak, S.4
-
Bagchi, M.5
-
Bak Nielsen, A.-S.6
-
Bassa, C. G.7
-
Bathula, A.8
- Berthereau, A.9
-
Bonetti, M.10
- Bortolas, E.10
-
Brook, P. R.11
-
Burgay, M.12
-
Caballero, R. N.13
-
Chalumeau, A.10
-
Champion, D. J.6
-
Chanlaridis, S.1
-
Chen, S.14
-
Cognard, I.9
-
Dandapat, S.15
-
Deb, D.5
-
Desai, S.16
-
Desvignes, G.6
- Dhanda Batra, N.17
-
Dwivedi, C.18
- Falxa, M.4
-
Ferdman, R. D.19
-
Franchini, A.10
-
Gair, J. R.20
-
Goncharov, B.21
-
Gopakumar, A.15
- Graikou, E.6
-
Grießmeier, J.-M.9
-
Guillemot, L.9
- Guo, Y. J.6
-
Gupta, Y.22
-
Hisano, S.23
-
Hu, H.6
- Iraci, F.2
-
Izquierdo Villalba, D.10
-
Jang, J.6
-
Jawor, J.6
-
Janssen, G. H.7
-
Jessner, A.6
-
Joshi, B. C.22
-
Kareem, F.24
-
Karuppusamy, R.6
-
Keane, E. F.25
-
Keith, M. J.26
-
Kharbanda, D.16
-
Kikunaga, T.23
-
Kolhe, N.27
-
Kramer, M.6
-
Krishnakumar, M. A.6
-
Lackeos, K.6
- Lee, K. J.28
- Liu, K.6
-
Liu, Y.29
- Lyne, A. G.26
-
McKee, J. W.30
- Maan, Y.22
- Main, R. A.6
-
Mickaliger, M. B.26
-
Nitu, I. C.26
-
Nobleson, K.31
-
Paladi, A. K.32
-
Parthasarathy, A.6
-
Perera, B. B. P.33
-
Perrodin, D.12
-
Petiteau, A.34
- Porayko, N. K.10
- Possenti, A.12
- Prabu, T.35
- Quelquejay, Leclere H.4
-
Rana, P.15
-
Samajdar, A.36
- Sanidas, S. A.26
- Semikoz, D.4
- Sesana, A.10
-
Shaifullah, G.10
-
Singha, J.2
-
Speri, L.20
- Spiewak, R.26
-
Srivastava, A.16
- Stappers, B. W.26
-
Surnis, M.37
-
Susarla, S. C.38
-
Susobhanan, A.39
-
Takahashi, K.40
-
Tarafdar, P.5
-
Theureau, G.9
-
Tiburzi, C.12
-
van, der Wateren E.7
-
Vecchio, A.11
-
Venkatraman Krishnan, V.6
-
Verbiest, J. P. W.41
-
Wang, J.42
- Wang, L.26
-
Wu, Z.29
- 1. Institute of Astrophysics, FORTH, N. Plastira 100, 70013, Heraklion, Greece
- 2. Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee-247667, India
- 3. Department of Electrical Engineering, IIT Hyderabad, Kandi, Telangana 502284, India
- 4. Université Paris Cité, CNRS, Astroparticule et Cosmologie, 75013 Paris, France
- 5. The Institute of Mathematical Sciences, C. I. T. Campus, Taramani, Chennai 600113, India
- 6. Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hügel 69, 53121 Bonn, Germany
- 7. ASTRON, Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy, Oude Hoogeveensedijk 4, 7991 PD, Dwingeloo, The Netherlands
- 8. Department of Physical Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Mohali, Punjab 140306, India
- 9. Laboratoire de Physique et Chimie de l'Environnement et de l'Espace, Université d'Orléans / CNRS, 45071 Orléans Cedex 02, France
- 10. Dipartimento di Fisica "G. Occhialini", Universitá degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 3, I-20126 Milano, Italy
- 11. Institute for Gravitational Wave Astronomy and School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 992TT, UK
- 12. INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Cagliari, via della Scienza 5, 09047 Selargius (CA), Italy
- 13. Hellenic Open University, School of Science and Technology, 26335 Patras, Greece
- 14. Kavli Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, P. R. China
- 15. Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Navy Nagar, Colaba, Mumbai 400005, India
- 16. Department of Physics, IIT Hyderabad, Kandi, Telangana 502284, India
- 17. Department of Physics and Astrophysics, University of Delhi, Delhi 110007, India
- 18. Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology, Valiamala, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala 695547,India
- 19. School of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
- 20. Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (Albert Einstein Institute), Am Mühlenberg 1, 14476 Potsdam, Germany
- 21. Gran Sasso Science Institute (GSSI), I-67100 L'Aquila, Italy
- 22. National Centre for Radio Astrophysics, Pune University Campus, Pune 411007, India
- 23. Kumamoto University, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kumamoto, 860-8555, Japan
- 24. Department of Physical Sciences,Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, Mohanpur, 741246, India
- 25. School of Physics, Trinity College Dublin, College Green, Dublin 2, D02 PN40, Ireland
- 26. Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
- 27. Department of Physics, St. Xavier's College (Autonomous), Mumbai 400001, India
- 28. Department of Astronomy,School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, P. R. China
- 29. National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, P. R. China
- 30. E.A. Milne Centre for Astrophysics, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Kingston-upon-Hull, HU6 7RX, UK
- 31. Department of Physics, BITS Pilani Hyderabad Campus, Hyderabad 500078, Telangana, India
- 32. Joint Astronomy Programme, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560012, India
- 33. Arecibo Observatory, HC3 Box 53995, Arecibo, PR 00612, USA
- 34. IRFU, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
- 35. Raman Research Institute India, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560080, India
- 36. Institut für Physik und Astronomie, Universität Potsdam, Haus 28, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24/25, 14476, Potsdam, Germany
- 37. Department of Physics, IISER Bhopal, Bhopal Bypass Road, Bhauri, Bhopal 462066, Madhya Pradesh, India
- 38. Ollscoil na Gaillimhe — University of Galway, University Road, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland
- 39. Center for Gravitation, Cosmology, and Astrophysics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA
- 40. Division of Natural Science, Faculty of Advanced Science and Technology, Kumamoto University, 2-39-1 Kurokami, Kumamoto 860-8555, Japan
- 41. Florida Space Institute, University of Central Florida, 12354 Research Parkway, Partnership 1 Building, Suite 214, Orlando, 32826-0650, FL, USA
- 42. Fakultät für Physik, Universität Bielefeld, Postfach 100131, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany
Description
Aims: The nanohertz gravitational wave background (GWB) is expected to be an aggregate signal of an ensemble of gravitational waves emitted predominantly by a large population of coalescing supermassive black hole binaries in the centres of merging galaxies. Pulsar tiNanohertz ming arrays (PTAs), which are ensembles of extremely stable pulsars at approximately kiloparsec distances precisely monitored for decades, are the most precise experiments capable of detecting this background. However, the subtle imprints that the GWB induces on pulsar timing data are obscured by many sources of noise that occur on various timescales. These must be carefully modelled and mitigated to increase the sensitivity to the background signal. Methods: In this paper, we present a novel technique to estimate the optimal number of frequency coefficients for modelling achromatic and chromatic noise, while selecting the preferred set of noise models to use for each pulsar. We also incorporated a new model to fit for scattering variations in the Bayesian pulsar timing package temponest. These customised noise models enable a more robust characterisation of single-pulsar noise. We developed a software package based on tempo2 to create realistic simulations of European Pulsar Timing Array (EPTA) datasets that allowed us to test the efficacy of our noise modelling algorithms. Results: Using these techniques, we present an in-depth analysis of the noise properties of 25 millisecond pulsars (MSPs) that form the second data release (DR2) of the EPTA and investigate the effect of incorporating low-frequency data from the Indian Pulsar Timing Array collaboration for a common sample of ten MSPs. We used two packages, enterprise and temponest, to estimate our noise models and compare them with those reported using EPTA DR1. We find that, while in some pulsars we can successfully disentangle chromatic from achromatic noise owing to the wider frequency coverage in DR2, in others the noise models evolve in a much more complicated way. We also find evidence of long-term scattering variations in PSR J1600-3053. Through our simulations, we identify intrinsic biases in our current noise analysis techniques and discuss their effect on GWB searches. The analysis and results discussed in this article directly help to improve the sensitivity to the GWB signal and they are already being used as part of global PTA efforts.