Published December 31, 2010 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Diaphorinae Schiner 1864

Authors/Creators

Description

Key to Afrotropical genera of Diaphorinae

1 Costa not extending beyond tip of R 4+5; distal vein M gently sinuate or broken or weakened, with distal section often displaced .......................................................2

– Costa extending beyond tip of R 4+5, usually ending at apex of vein M; vein M unbroken, rarely weakened ....................................................................................5

2 Vein R 4+5 ending along distal anterior wing margin, well before wing apex; distal parts of R 4+5 and M 1+2 strongly diverging...............................................................3

– Vein R 4+5 ending almost at wing apex; distal parts of R 4+5 and M 1+2 subparallel, slightly diverging or bowed with respect to each other .........................................4

3 Upper part of proepisternum with 2–4 fine setae; acrostichals usually present; male sternite 8 often with strong projecting setae ...................... Asyndetus Loew, 1869

– Upper part of proepisternum usually bare; acrostichals absent or microscopic; male sternite 8 without strong setae.............................. Cryptophleps Lichtwardt, 1898

4 Acrostichals biseriate; male antenna very long (4/5 the body length); male fore and mid tarsi modified; male sternite 8 with 2 strong projecting setae .......................... ........................................................................................... Aphasmaphleps gen. n.

– Acrostichals absent; male antenna about as long as head height; male fore and mid tarsi simple; male sternite 8 without strong setae; western Pacific.......................... .................................................................................[Phasmaphleps Bickel, 2005]

5 Occiput concave; antennal postpedicel usually pressed laterally, bladelike to subtriangular, with distinct apex and dorsal to dorsoapical arista-like stylus.............6

– Occiput convex or flat; antennal postpedicel usually globular, reniform, conoid or budlike, with indistinct apex, or with slender apical projection, and with subapical or apical, rarely dorsal, arista-like stylus inserted sometimes in apical incision ...8

6 Hind coxa with external vertical row of 3 or 4 setae decreasing in length ventrally; scape with dorsal setae (bare in some Holarctic species) ........................................ ........................................................................................... Argyra Macquart, 1834

– Hind coxa with one external seta at basal quarter; scape bare...............................7

7 Wing vein M 1+2 with rather distinct sinuation at 2/5 of distal part; arista-like stylus dorsal; antennae positioned at upper quarter of head; male segment 7 rather long ......................................................................................... Urodolichus Lamb, 1922

– Wing vein M 1+2 nearly straight; arista-like stylus dorsoapical; antennae positioned at middle of head; male segment 7 short; Azores .................................................... ........................................................................... [Falbouria Dyte, 1980; Figs 8, 9]

8 Posterior four femora with anterior subapical seta in both sexes; male frons and face broad...............................................................................................................9

– Posterior four femora without distinct anterior subapical seta, at most with stiff hairs; male eyes usually convergent or contiguous above or below antennae.....10

9 Antennal pedicel with finger-like projection overlapping postpedicel; male sternite 8 with strong projecting setae ...................................... Dactylonotus Parent, 1934

– Antennal pedicel without finger-like projection; male sternite 8 without strong setae......................................................................... Nurteria Dyte & Smith, 1980

10 Acrostichal setae absent; female clypeus with four projecting setae; male segment 7 rather long; postgonite prominent, often with a group of pedunculate setae........ .............................................................................................. Acropsilus Mik, 1878

– Acrostichals present, biseriate; female clypeus without setae; male segment 7 short; postgonite reduced ...............................................................................................11

11 Antennae positioned at middle of head; upper part of proepisternum with 2–4 fine setae; wing usually broadest at basal quarter, with nearly straight R 4+5 and M veins ............................................................................... Diaphorus Meigen, 1824

– Antennae positioned at upper quarter to third of head; upper part of proepisternum usually bare; wing usually broadest at middle, with convex anteriorly R 4+5 and M veins .....................................................................................................................12

12 Face nearly parallel-sided, subequal in width to frons; male postpedicel budlike, with abruptly drawn-out apex; male sternite 8 with strong projecting setae; hypopygial surstylus and epandrial lobe long and thin; male cercus with long distoventral projection ...................................................................... Trigonocera Becker, 1902

– Male eyes convergent or contiguous below antennae; female face distinctly narrowed downwards; male postpedicel globular, reniform, conoid (Chrysotus) or with slender apical projection (Achradocera); male sternite 8 with simple hairs, rarely with short thick setae; surstylus and epandrial lobe broad; male cercus without distoventral projection .............................................................................................................13

13 Male postpedicel with slender apical projection bearing apical arista-like stylus, and lower postocular surface of male with many flattened pale setae ..................... ..................................................................................... Achradocera Becker, 1922

– Male postpedicel globular, reniform or conoid with subapica1 arista-like stylus; lower postocular surface with fine unmodified setae...... Chrysotus Meigen, 1824

Notes

Published as part of Grichanov, Igor Ya., 2010, Aphasmaphleps, a new genus of long-legged flies from Senegal, with a key to the genera of Afrotropical Diaphorinae (Diptera: Dolichopodidae), pp. 405 in African Invertebrates 51 (2) on pages 409-412, DOI: 10.5733/afin.051.0209, http://zenodo.org/record/7913715

Files

Files (7.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:976430ea9bb87aea7860d51e07c33de2
7.0 kB Download

System files (21.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:dda577bcafb5bde89b0e2310155dfd5b
21.9 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Scientific name authorship
Schiner
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
Arthropoda
Order
Diptera
Family
Dolichopodidae
Taxon rank
subFamily
Taxonomic concept label
Diaphorinae Schiner, 1864 sec. Grichanov, 2010

References

  • PARENT, O. 1933. Quelques especes nouvelles de Dipteres Dolichopodides de la region palearctique. Annales de la Societe scientifique de Bruxelles (B) 53: 74 - 78.
  • DYTE, C. E. 1980. Some replacement names in the Dolichopodidae (Diptera). Entomologica Scandinavica 11 (2): 223 - 224.