Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published February 15, 2022 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

Evaluation of Tagging Methods for Unique Identification of Individuals in Three Aquatic Eurycea Salamander Species

Authors/Creators

Description

Moon, Linda M., Butler, Matthew, Campbell, Lindsay Glass (2022): Evaluation of Tagging Methods for Unique Identification of Individuals in Three Aquatic Eurycea Salamander Species. Ichthyology & Herpetology 110 (1): 77-86, DOI: 10.1643/h2021042, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1643/h2021042

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:7A27FFB8FFE3FF9DBF0CF07BFFCB0B69

Has part
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7846915 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7846919 (DOI)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/5AC8665EFFE0FF9EBF6BF0C9FD840B88 (URL)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/5AC8665EFFE7FF99BF82F0C9FADC0BAF (URL)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/5AC8665EFFE7FF99BF82F6DEFD840DBA (URL)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/5AC8665EFFE6FF98BF6BF0C9FA190B88 (URL)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/5AC8665EFFE6FF98BF6BF661FDC10D0A (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7846921 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7852483 (DOI)

References

  • Arnold, T. W. 2010. Uninformative parameters and model selection using Akaike's information criterion. Journal of Wildlife Management 74:1175-1178.
  • Bailey, L. L. 2004. Evaluating elastomer marking and photo identification methods for terrestrial salamanders: marking effects and observer bias. Herpetological Review 35:38-41.
  • Bates, D., M. Machler, B. Bolker, and S. Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67:1-48.
  • Bendik, N. F., T. A. Morrison, A. G. Gluesenkamp, M. S. Sanders, and L. J. O'Donnell. 2013. Computer-assisted photo identification outperforms visible implant elastomers in an endangered salamander, Eurycea tonkawae. PLoS ONE 8:e59424.
  • Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. Second edition. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  • Conover, W. J. 1999. Practical Nonparametric Statistics. Third edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Courtois, E. A., C. Lelong, O. Calvez, A. Loyau, and D. S. Schmeller. 2013. The use of visible implant alpha tags for anuran tadpoles. Herpetological Review 44:230-233.
  • Cowen, L., and C. J. Schwarz. 2006. The Jolly-Seber model with tag loss. Biometrics 62:699-705.
  • Davis, T. M., and K. Ovaska. 2001. Individual recognition of amphibians: effects of toe clipping and fluorescent tagging on the salamander Plethodon vehiculum. Journal of Herpetology 35:217-225.
  • Devitt, T. J., A. M. Wright, D. C. Cannatella, and D. M. Hillis. 2019. Species delimitation in endangered groundwater salamanders: implications for aquifer management and biodiversity conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116: 2624-2633.
  • Donnelly, M. A., C. Guyer, J. E. Juterbock, and R. A. Alford. 1994. Techniques for marking amphibians, p. 277-284. In: Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians. W. R. Heyer, M. A. Donnelly, R. W. McDiarmid, L. C. Hayek, and M. S. Foster (eds.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
  • Gamble, L., S. Ravela, and K. McGarigal. 2008. Multi-scale features for identifying individuals in large biological databases: an application of pattern recognition technology to the marbled salamander Ambystoma opacum. Journal of Applied Ecology 45:170-180.
  • Gibbons, J. W., and K. M. Andrews. 2004. PIT tagging: simple technology at its best. BioScience 54:447-454.
  • Gillette, J. R., and M. G. Peterson. 2001. The benefits of transparency: candling as a simple method for determining sex in red-backed salamanders (Plethodon cinereus). Herpetological Review 32:233-235.
  • Grant, E. H. C., and P. Nanjappa. 2006. Addressing error in identification of Ambystoma maculatum (spotted salamanders) using spot patterns. Herpetological Review 37:57-60.
  • Heemeyer, J. L., J. A. Homyack, and C. A. Haas. 2007. Retention and readability of visible implant elastomer marks in eastern red-backed salamanders (Plethodon cinereus). Herpetological Review 38:425-428.
  • Kinkead, K. E., J. D. Lanham, and R. R. Montanucci. 2006. Comparison of anesthesia and marking techniques on stress and behavioral responses in two Desmognathus salamanders. Journal of Herpetology 40:323-328.
  • Lunghi, E., and M. Veith. 2017. Are visual implant alpha tags adequate for individually marking European cave salamanders (genus Hydromantes)? Salamandra 53:541- 544.
  • Mitchell, S. M., J. R. Ennen, K. K. Cecala, and J. Davenport. 2017. Ex-situ PIT-tag retention study in two Desmognathus species. Herpetological Review 48:313-316.
  • Osbourn, M. S., D. J. Hocking, C. A. Conner, W. E. Peterman, and R. D. Semlitsch. 2011. Use of fluorescent visible implant alphanumeric tags to individually mark juvenile ambystomatid salamanders. Herpetological Review 42:43-47.
  • Ott, J. A., and D. E. Scott. 1999. Effects of toe-clipping and PIT-tagging on growth and survival in metamorphic Ambystoma opacum. Journal of Herpetology 33:344-348.
  • Ousterhout, B. H., and R. D. Semlitsch. 2014. Measuring terrestrial movement behavior using passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags: effects of tag size on detection, movement, survival, and growth. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 68:343-350.
  • Phillips, C. T., and J. N. Fries. 2009. An evaluation of visible implant elastomer for marking the federally listed Fountain Darter and the San Marcos salamander. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 29:529-532.
  • Pollock, K. H. 1991. Modeling capture, recapture, and removal statistics for estimation of demographic parameters for fish and wildlife populations: past, present, and future. Journal of the American Statistical Association 86: 225-238.
  • R Core Team. 2020. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
  • Ralston Marold, M. A. 2001. Evaluating visual implant elastomer polymer for marking small, stream-dwelling salamanders. Herpetological Review 32:91-92.
  • Richards, S. J., U. Sinsch, and R. A. Alford. 1994. Radio tracking, p. 155-157. In: Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians. W. R. Heyer, M. A. Donnelly, R. W. McDiarmid, L. C. Hayek, and M. S. Foster (eds.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
  • Schlaepfer, M. A. 1998. Use of a fluorescent marking technique on small terrestrial anurans. Herpetological Review 29:25-26.
  • Sinsch, U. 1997. Postmetamorphic dispersal and recruitment of first breeders in a Bufo calamita metapopulation. Oecologia 112:42-47.
  • Welsh-Appleby, B. 2015. Analysis of persistent marking techniques using passive integrated transponders and visible im-plant elastomer through metamorphosis in Ambystoma mavortium. Unpubl. undergraduate thesis, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska (available at https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/envstudtheses/175/).
  • Whiteman, H. H., J. M. Doyle, J. Earl, C. Aubee, R. Brown, S. Thomason, and T. Schoborg. 2016. A PIT tagging technique for ambystomatid salamanders. Herpetological Review 47:32-34.
  • Wright, K. 2001. Restraint techniques and euthanasia, p. 111-122. In: Amphibian Medicine and Captive Husbandry. K. Wright and B. Whitaker (eds.). Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, Florida.