Language Culture as a Component of the International Relations Specialists Training: Origins and Present
Description
The purpose of the work is to state the speech culture role in the training of the international sphere of activity specialists as an instrument of interaction with different cultures while performing their professional duties. The methodology of the study is to use such research methods as study, analyses and generalization in order to reveal the notion of speech culture, namely, diplomatic eloquence as the ability to choose and exercise speech act (speech behaviour) depending on the professional speech’ goals and content through linguistic means, as well addressing to the strategy and tactics of communication. The scientific novelty is to describe the problem of mastering the diplomatic eloquence skills as an act of a cultural dialogue implementation in the international experts’ professional activity. The problems of communication, discourse, and various professional skills formation of specialists from various fields have widely been discussed in the scientific literature, but the problem of diplomatic communication and the speech culture formation skills in the context of professional international activity remains to be studied. Conclusions. Language is not merely a means of diplomatic communication, but rather a tool for expanding diplomatic sphere of activity. Since every language is deeply rooted in a certain culture, it is a unique representation of the world picture. However, the cultural dialogue, implemented through eloquence between different countries, requires the existence of complex multidimensional processes. Thus, diplomatic negotiations, even held in the same language, sometimes do not reach the positive result because of the impossibility and inability to convey the message content.
Files
Language_Culture_as_a_Component_of_the_International_Relations_Specialists_Training_Origins_and_Present.pdf
Files
(349.0 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:f1f07de69ac8727b181ddfe7e780325f
|
349.0 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Beljakov, M.V. (2011). 'Semantiko-semioticheskie aspekty diplomaticheskogo diskursa' [Semantic-semiotic aspects of diplomatic discourse]. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Serija: Teorija jazyka. Semiotika. Semantika, no. 1, pp. 59–66.
- Biletska, O.O. (2016). Rozpovsiudzhennia inozemnykh mov ta rozvytok perekladatskoi diialnosti v Lytovsko-Polskyi period XIV–XVI stolittia' [Foreign languages expansion and translation activity development during polish–lithuanian commonwealth (XIV–XVI centuries)]. Molodyi vchenyi, no. 4.1 (31.1), pp. 1–4.
- Bostandzhjan, L. (2015). Kommunikativno-pragmaticheskie osobennosti diplomaticheskogo diskursa [Communicative-pragmatic features of diplomatic discourse]. [online] Available at: <http://publications.ysu.am/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Bostanjyan_L..pdf> [Accessed 29 October 2018].
- Vasilenko, I.A. (2011). Politicheskie peregovory [Political negotiations]. Moscow: INFRA-M.
- Zubkov, M.H. (2004). Suchasna ukrainska dilova mova [Contemporary Ukrainian Business Language]. Kharkiv: Torsinh.
- Kalinina, A.S. (2017). 'Istorija i sovremennost' russkoj diplomaticheskoj ritoriki' [History and modernity of Russian diplomatic rhetoric]. [online] Available at: <http://euroasia-science.ru/filologicheskie-nauki/istoriya-i-sovremennost-russkoj-diplomaticheskoj-ritoriki/> [Accessed 25 October 2018].
- Matsko, L.I., Matsko, O.M. (2006). Rytoryka [Rhetoric]. Kyiv: Vyshcha shkola.
- Matsko, O.M. (2001). Movni formuly u dyplomatychnykh tekstakh suchasnoi ukrainskoi movy (funktsionalno-stylistychnyi analiz) [Linguistic formulas in diplomatic texts of contemporary Ukrainian language (functional-stylistic analysis]. D.Ed. National Academy of Science of Ukrainy, Institute of the Ukrainian Language.
- Pazynych, O.M. (2001). Funktsionalno-strukturni osoblyvosti tekstiv dyplomatychnoho lystuvannia [Functional and structural features of texts of diplomatic correspondence]. D.Ed. National Academy of Science of Ukrainy, Institute of the Ukrainian Language.
- Pashuto, V.T. (1968). Vneshnjaja politika Drevnej Rusi [The Foreign Policy of Ancient Rus]. Moscow: Nauka.
- Ponomarenko, O.V. (2004). Linhvoprahmatychni zasoby vyrazhennia ukhylnosti v suchasnomu italiiskomu politychnomu dyskursi [Linguopragmatic means of expression of evasion in contemporary Italian political discourse]. D.Ed. Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv.
- Saharov, A.N. (1986). Diplomatija drevnej Rusi: IX – pervaja polovina X vv. [The diplomacy of ancient Rus: IX – the first half of the X century]. Moscow: Mysl'.
- Skriabina, V.B. (2018). Linhvistychni aspekty persuazyvnosti v dyplomatychnomu dyskursi [Linguistic aspects of persuasion in diplomatic discourse]. Mizhnarodni vidnosyny: teoretyko-praktychni aspekty [International Relations: Theory and Practical Aspects], issue 2, pp. 265–274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-745x.2.2018.133362.
- Terentij, L.M. (2016). Intencional'naja struktura diplomaticheskogo diskursa [Intentional structure of diplomatic discourse]. D.Ed. Moscow Financial and Economic Institute.
- Timofeev, A.A. (2015). 'Osobennosti ritoriki diplomatisekogo obshhenija' [Features of the rhetoric of diplomatic communication]. Russkaja rech' [Russian speech], issue 1, pp. 94–101.
- Chistjakova, I.J. (2009). Russkaja soveshhatel'naja oratorika i klassicheskaja ritorika [Russian advisory oratory and classical rhetoric]. Gumanitarnye issledovanija, no. 3 (31), pp. 93–97.
- Shynkarenko, T.I. (2009). Mova dyplomatychnykh dokumentiv [Language of diplomatic documents]. Kyiv : VNTs "Kyivskyi Universytet".