Data for: Ancient gene linkages support ctenophores as sister to other animals

A central question in evolutionary biology is whether sponges or ctenophores (comb jellies) are the sister group to all other animals. These alternative phylogenetic hypotheses imply different scenarios for the evolution of complex neural systems and other animal-specific traits^1–6. Conventional phylogenetic approaches based on morphological characters and increasingly extensive gene sequence collections have not been able to definitively answer this question^7–11. Here we develop chromosome-scale gene linkage, also known as synteny, as a novel phylogenetic character for resolving this question¹². We report new chromosome-scale genomes for a ctenophore and two marine sponges, and for three unicellular relatives of animals (a choanoflagellate, a filasterean amoeba, and an ichthyosporean) that serve as outgroups for phylogenetic analysis. Remarkably, we find ancient syntenies that are conserved between animals and their close unicellular relatives. Ctenophores and unicellular eukaryotes share ancestral metazoan patterns while sponges, bilaterians, and cnidarians share derived chromosomal rearrangements. Conserved syntenic characters unite sponges with bilaterians, cnidarians, and placozoans in a monophyletic clade to the exclusion of ctenophores, placing ctenophores as the sister group to all other animals. The patterns of synteny shared by sponges, bilaterians, and cnidarians are the result of rare and irreversible chromosome fusion-and-mixing events that provide robust and unambiguous phylogenetic support for the ctenophore-sister hypothesis. These findings provide a new framework for resolving deep, recalcitrant phylogenetic problems and have implications for our understanding of animal evolution.

1. Ryan, J. F. et al. The genome of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi and its implications for cell type evolution. Science 342, 1242592 (2013).

2. Halanych, K. M. The ctenophore lineage is older than sponges? That cannot be right! Or can it? J. Exp. Biol. 218, 592–597 (2015).

3. Jékely, G., Paps, J. & Nielsen, C. The phylogenetic position of ctenophores and the origin(s) of nervous systems. Evodevo 6, 1 (2015).

4. Ryan, J. F. & Chiodin, M. Where is my mind? How sponges and placozoans may have lost neural cell types. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 370, 20150059– (2015).

5. Moroz, L. L. et al. The ctenophore genome and the evolutionary origins of neural systems. Nature 510, 109–114 (2014).

6. Burkhardt, P. Ctenophores and the evolutionary origin(s) of neurons. Trends Neurosci. 45, 878–880 (2022).

7. Philippe, H. et al. Phylogenomics revives traditional views on deep animal relationships. Curr. Biol. 19, 706–712 (2009).

8. Simion, P. et al. A Large and Consistent Phylogenomic Dataset Supports Sponges as the Sister Group to All Other Animals. Curr. Biol. 27, 958–967 (2017).

9. Dunn, C. W. et al. Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature 452, 745–749 (2008).

10. Whelan, N. V. et al. Ctenophore relationships and their placement as the sister group to all other animals. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1737–1746 (2017).

11. Li, Y., Shen, X.-X., Evans, B., Dunn, C. W. & Rokas, A. Rooting the animal tree of life. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 4322–4333 (2021).

12. Simakov, O. et al. Deeply conserved synteny and the evolution of metazoan chromosomes. Sci. Adv. 8, eabi5884 (2022).