Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published January 12, 2023 | Version v1
Journal article Open

The largest amber-preserved flower revisited

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Invalidenstrasse 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany
  • 2. Institut für Paläontologie, University of Vienna, Josef-Holaubek Platz 2 (UZA 2), 1090 Wien, Austria

Description

Sadowski, Eva-Maria, Hofmann, Christa-Charlotte (2023): The largest amber-preserved flower revisited. Scientific Reports 13 (1): 17, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-24549-z, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24549-z

Files

source.pdf

Files (2.6 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:e1a35998749ca6470ceeae7e4d5da31d
2.6 MB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FFA3FF98FF9CA647FFEEAE7E4D5DA31D
URL
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFA3FF98FF9CA647FFEEAE7E4D5DA31D

Cites
Publication: 10.26879/112 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.cretres.2021.104987 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1038/s41598-019-55622-9 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1038/s41598-017-11536-y (DOI)
Publication: 10.1038/nplants.2016.5 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1038/nplants.2017.49 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118820 (DOI)
Has part
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.7535463 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039A87E0FF9CA642FE2EA8764E81A3CE (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7535486 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7535488 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7535490 (DOI)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/DF4C667EFF98A643FE71AC944F16A052 (URL)
Is source of
Dataset: http://www.gbif.org/dataset/347361ec-c58e-45c1-a57f-ed2f9e4591eb (URL)

References

  • 1. Baranov, V. A.et al. Synchrotron-radiation computed tomography uncovers ecosystem functions of fly larvae in an Eocene forest. Palaeontol. Electron.24, a07. https://doi.org/10.26879/112 (2021).
  • 2. Feldberg, K. et al. Liverworts from Cretaceous amber. Cretac. Res. 128, 104987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2021.104987 (2021).
  • 3. Gandolfo, M. A., Nixon, K. C., Crepet, W.L. & Grimaldi, D. A.A late Cretaceous fagalean inflorescence preserved in amber from New Jersey. Am. J. Bot. 105, 1-12 (2018).
  • 4. Kettunen, E., Schmidt, A. R., Diederich, P., Grabenhorst, H. & Rikkinen, J. Lichen-associated fungi from Paleogene amber. New Phytol.209, 896-898 (2016).
  • 5. Rikkinen, J., Grimaldi, D. A.& Schmidt, A. R. Morphological stasis in the first myxomycete from the Mesozoic, and the likely role of cryptobiosis. Sci. Rep. 9, 19730. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55622-9 (2019).
  • 6. Sadowski, E.-M. et al. How diverse were ferns in the Baltic amber forest?. J. Syst. Evol. 57, 305-328 (2019).
  • 7. Sadowski, E.-M., Schmidt, A. R. & Denk, T. Staminate inflorescences with in situ pollen from Eocene Baltic amber reveal high diversity in Fagaceae (oak family). Willdenowia 50, 405-517 (2020).
  • 8. Penney, D. (ed.) Biodiversity of Fossils in Amber from the Major World Deposits (Siri Scientific Press, 2010).
  • 9. Hoffeins, C. & Hoffeins, H. W. On the frequency of inclusions in Baltic and Bitterfeld amber (Tertiary, Eocene) from unselected material, with special reference to the order Diptera. Stud. Dipterol. 10, 381-392 (2003).
  • 10. Sontag, E. Animal inclusions in a sample of unselected Baltic amber. Acta Zool. Cracoviensia 46 (supp.-Fossil Insects), 431-440 (2003).
  • 11. Crepet, W.L., Nixon, K. C., Grimaldi, D. & Riccio, M. A mosaic Lauralean flower from the Early Cretaceous of Myanmar. Am. J. Bot. 103, 290-297 (2016).
  • 12. Del Rio, C., Haevermans, T. & De Franceschi, D. First record of an Icacinaceae Miers fossil flower from Le Quesnoy (Ypresian, France) amber. Sci. Rep.7, 11099. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11536-y (2017).
  • 13. Moreau, J.-D., Neraudeau, D., Perrichot, V. & Tafforeau, P. 100-million-year-old conifer tissues from the mid-Cretaceous amber of Charente (western France) revealed by synchrotron microtomography. Ann. Bot. 119, 117-128 (2017).
  • 14. Poinar, G. & Struwe,L. An asterid flower from neotropical mid-Tertiary amber.Nat.Plants 2, 16005. https://doi.org/10.1038/nplan ts.2016.5 (2016).
  • 15. Sadowski, E.-M., Seyfullah, L. J., Schmidt, A. R. & Kunzmann, L. Conifers of the 'Baltic amber forest' and their palaeoecological significance. Stapfia 106, 1-73 (2017).
  • 16. Sadowski, E.-M., Schmidt, A. R.& Kunzmann, L.The hyperdiverse conifer flora of the Baltic amber forest.Palaeontograph.B 304, 1-148 (2022).
  • 17. Sokoloff, D. D. et al. Staminate flower of Prunus s. l. (Rosaceae) from Eocene Rovno amber (Ukraine). J.Plant. Res.131, 925-943 (2018).
  • 18. Conwentz, H. Die Angiospermen des Bernsteins. In Die Flora des Bernsteins und ihre Beziehungen zur Flora der Tertiarformation und der Gegenwart, 2. Band (eds Goppert, H. R. & Menge, A.) 1-144 (W. Engelmann, 1886).
  • 19. Sadowski, E.-M., Hammel, J.U. & Denk, T. Synchrotron X-ray imaging of a dichasium cupule of Castanopsis from Eocene Baltic amber. Am. J.Bot. 105, 2025-2036 (2018).
  • 20. Prince, L. M. A brief nomenclatural review of genera and tribes in Theaceae. Aliso 24, 105-121 (2007).
  • 21. Caspary, R. Privatsitzung am 4 October. Schrifen Phys. Okon. Ges. Konigsberg (Abhandlungen) 13, 15-18 (1872).
  • 22. Gothan, W. Lehrbuch der Palaobotanik 391 (Gebruder Borntraeger, 1921).
  • 23. Gothan, W. Bernstein als Erhalter vorzeitlicher Lebensformen I. Blumeneinschlusse im Bernstein. In Kosmos Handweiser fur Naturfreunde (ed. Gesellschaf der Naturfreunde) 113-115, 128 (Franckh'sche Verlagshandlung, USA, 1929).
  • 24. Gothan, W. Die Probleme der Palaobotanik und ihre geschichtliche Entwicklung. In Probleme der Wissenschaf in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart, Vol. 10 (ed. Kropp, G.) 20 (Wissenschafliche Editionsgesellschaf MBH, 1948).
  • 25. Gothan, W. & Weyland, H. Lehrbuch der Palaobotanik (Akademie-Verlag, 1954).
  • 26. Gothan, W. & Weyland, H. Lehrbuch der Palaobotanik (Akademie-Verlag, 1964).
  • 27. Ruffle, L. & Helms, J. Waldsteppe und Insektenwelt im Bernstein, Beispiele aus der Bernsteinsammlung des Palaontologischen Museums. Wissenschafliche Z. Humboldt-Univ. Berlin 19, 243-249 (1970).
  • 28. Ruffle, L. & Litke, R. Additions to the Middle Eocene flora of the Geiseltal, Germany and some other Eocene localities. Feddes Repert. 111, 449-463 (2000).
  • 29. Schenk, A. II Abteilung Palaophytologie. In Handbuch der Palaontologie (ed. Zittel, K. A.) 517 (R. Oldenburg, 1890).
  • 30. Kirchheimer, F. Die Laubgewachse der Braunkohlenzeit (Knapp, 1957).
  • 31. Mai, H. D. Uber fossile Lauraceae und Theaceae in Mitteleuropa. Feddes Repert. 82, 313-341 (1971).
  • 32. Stevens, P. F., Dressler, S. & Weitzman, A. L. Theaceae. In hve Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. VI, Flowering Plants, Dicotyledons, Celastrales, Oxalidales, Rosales, Cornales, Ericales (ed. Kubitzki, K.) 463-471 (Springer, 2004).
  • 33. Brand, A. Symplocaceae.In Das Pflanzenreich, Vol. 6 (ed. Engler, A.) 1-100 (Wilhelm Engelmann, 1901).
  • 34. Luna, I. & Ochoterena, H. Phylogenetic relationships of the genera of Theaceae based on morphology. Cladistics 20, 223-270 (2004).
  • 35. Nooteboom, H. P. Revision of the Symplocaceae of the Old World, New Caledonia excepted. PhD thesis.335pp. (University of Leiden, 1975).
  • 36. Nooteboom, H. P.Symplocaceae. In hve Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol.VI, Flowering Plants, Dicotyledons, Celastrales, Oxalidales, Rosales, Cornales, Ericales (ed. Kubitzki, K.) 443-449 (Springer, 2004).
  • 37. Tsou, C.-H. Embryology of the Theaceae-Anther and ovule development of Camellia, Franklinia, and Schima. Am. J. Bot. 84, 369-381 (1997).
  • 38. Tsou, C.-H. Early floral development of Cammellioideae (Theaceae). Am. J.Bot. 85, 1531-1547 (1998).
  • 39. Van der Meijden, R. A survey of the pollen morphology of the indo-pacific species of Symplocos (Symplocaceae). Pollen et Spores 12, 513-551 (1970).
  • 40. Fritsch, P. W., Kelly, L. M., Wang, Y., Almeda, F. & Kriebel, R. Revised infrafamilial classification of Symplocaceae based on phylogenetic data from DNA sequences and morphology. Taxon 57, 823-852 (2008).
  • 41. Nagamasu, H. Pollen morphology of Japanese Symplocos. Bot. Mag. Tokyo 102, 149-164 (1989).
  • 42. Wang, Y. et al. Phylogeny and infrageneric classification of Symplocos (Symplocaceae) inferred from DNA sequence data. Am. J. Bot. 91, 1901-1914 (2004).
  • 43. Gruber, H. Zur Pollenmorphologie ausgewahlter rezenter und fossiler Vertreter der Gattung Symplocos. Master thesis, University of Vienna (1996).
  • 44. Hofmann, C.-C., Kodrul, T. M., Liu, X. & Jin, J. H. Scanning electron microscopy investigations of middle to late Eocene pollen from the Changchang Basin (Hainan Island, South China)-insights into the palaeobiogeography and fossil history of Juglans, Fagus, Lagerstroemia, Mortoniodendron, Cornus, Nyssa, Symplocos and some Icacinaceae in SE Asia. Rev. Palaeobot.Palynol.265, 41-61 (2019).
  • 45. Fritsch, P. W. & Alemda, F. A taxonomic revision of Antillean Symplocos (Symplocaceae). Phytotaxa 194, 1-67 (2015).
  • 46. Barth, M. O. Pollen morphology of Brazilian Symplocos species (Symplocaceae). Grana 18, 99-107 (1972).
  • 47. Barth, M. O. The sporoderm of Brazilian Symplocos pollen types (Symplocaceae). Grana 21, 65-69 (1982).
  • 48. Grimsson, F., Bouchal, J. M., Xafis, A. & Zetter, R. Combined LM and SEM study of the middle Miocene (Sarmatian) palynoflora from the Lavanttal Basin, Austria: Part V.Magnoliophyta 3-Myrtales to Ericales. Grana 59, 127-193 (2020).
  • 49. Aranha Filho, J. L. M., Fritsch, P. W., Almeda, F. & Martins, A. B. Cryptic dioecy is widespread in South American species of Symplocos section Barberina (Symplocaceae).Plant Syst. Evol. 277, 99-104 (2009).
  • 50. Krutzsch, W. Paleogeography and historical phytogeography (paleochorology) in the Neophyticum. Plant Syst. Evol. 162, 5-61 (1989).
  • 51. Tiffney, B. H. Fossil fruit and seed flora from the early Eocene Fisher/Sullivan site. In Early Eocene Vertebrates and Plants from the Fisher/Sullivan Site (Nanjemoy Formation) Stafford County, Virginia (eds Weems, R. E. & Grimsley, G. J.) 139-159 (Virginia Division of Mineral Resources, 1999).
  • 52. Mai, D.H. & Martinetto, E.A reconsideration of the diversity of Symplocos in the European Neogene on the basis of fruit morphology. Rev. Palaeobot.Palynol. 140, 1-26 (2006).
  • 53. Manchester, S. R. & Fritsch, P. W. European fossil fruits of Sphenotheca related to extant Asian species of Symplocos. J. Syst. Evol. 52, 68-74 (2014).
  • 54. Liu, B. & Qin, H.-N. Taxonomic revision of the Symplocos nakaharae complex (Symplocaceae) with special reference to fruit morphology. J.Syst. Evol. 51, 94-114 (2013).
  • 55. Kirchheimer, F.Die Symplocaceen der erdgeschichtlichen Vergangenheit. Palaeontograph.B 90, 1-52 (1950).
  • 56. Saporta, G. Prodrome d'une flore fossile des travertins anciens de Sezanne. Mem. Soc.Geol. France 2. Ser. 8, 374-379 (1868).
  • 57. Friedrich, P. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Tertiarflora der Provinz Sachsen. Abh. Geol. Spezialkarte Preussens hvuringischen Staaten IV, 1-305 (1883).
  • 58. Unger, F. Genera et Species Plantarum Fossilium (Wilhelmum Braunmuller, 1850).
  • 59. Weyland, H. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Rheinischen Tertiarflora III. Palaeontograph. B 83, 123-171 (1938).
  • 60. Unger, F. Sylloge plantarum fossilium III. Denkschr. Akad. Wissensch. Wien Math. Naturwiss. Cl. 25, 25 (1866).
  • 61. Knowlton, F.H. A catalogue of the Cretaceous and Tertiary plants of North America. Bull. U. S. Geol. Surv. 152, 487-520 (1898).
  • 62. Reid, E. M. & Chandler, M. E. J. hve London Clay flora (British Museum of Natural History, 1933).
  • 63. Kunzmann, L. & Mai, D. H. Conifers of the Mastixioideae-flora from Wiesa near Kamenz (Saxony, Miocene) with special consideration of leaves. Palaeontograph.B 272, 67-135 (2005).
  • 64. Kunzmann, L. & Walther, H. Early Oligocene plant taphocoenoses of the Haselbach megalforal complex and the reconstruction of palaeovegetation. Palaeobiol. Palaeoenviron. 92, 295-307 (2012).
  • 65. Mai, D. H.& Walther, H. Die Floren der Haselbacher Serie im Weisselster-Becken (Bezirk Leipzig, DDR).Abh. Staatl.Mus. Mineral. Geol. Dresden 28, 1-101 (1978).
  • 66. Fritsch, P. W., Manchester, S. R., Stone, R. D., Cruz, B. C. & Almeda, F. Northern hemisphere origins of the amphi-Pacific tropical plant family Symplocaceae. J. Biogeogr. 42, 891-901 (2015).
  • 67. Huegele, I. B. & Manchester, S. R. Newly recognized diversity of fruits and seeds from the late Paleogene flora of Trinity County, East Texas, USA. Int. J.Plant Sci. 180, 681-708 (2019).
  • 68. Tiffney, B.H., Manchester, S. R. & Fritsch, P.W. Two new species of Symplocos based on endocarps from the early Miocene Brandon Lignite of Vermont, USA. Acta Palaeobot.58, 185-198 (2018).
  • 69. Kaasalainen, U., Schmidt, A. R. & Rikkinen, J. Diversity and ecological adaptations in Palaeogene lichens. Nat. Plants 3, 17049. https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2017.49 (2017).
  • 70. Rikkinen, J.& Schmidt, A. R. Morphological convergence in forest microfungi provides a proxy for Paleogene forest structure.In Transformative Paleobotany (eds Krings, M. et al.) 527-549 (Academic Press, 2018).
  • 71. Sadowski, E.-M., Seyfullah, L. J., Wilson, C. A., Calvin, C. L. & Schmidt, A. R. Diverse early dwarf mistletoes (Arceuthobium), ecological keystones of the Eocene Baltic amber biota. Am. J.Bot. 104, 694-718 (2017).
  • 72. Sadowski, E.-M. et al. Graminids from Eocene Baltic amber. Rev.Palaeobot. Palynol.233, 161-168 (2016).
  • 73. Bratseva, G. M. Palynological studies of upper Cretaceous and Palaeogene of the Far East. Acad. Sci. Publ. USSR Trans. Geol. Inst. 207, 1-56 (1969).
  • 74. eFloras (2008). Published on the Internet.Missouri Botanical Garden, St.Louis, MO & Harvard University Herbaria, Cambridge, MA. http://www.efloras.org/. Accessed 17 Nov 2021.
  • 75. Manchester, S. R., Chen, Z.-D., Lu, A.-M. & Uemura, K. Eastern Asian endemic seed plant genera and their paleogeographic history throughout the Northern Hemisphere.J.Syst. Evol.47, 1-42 (2009).
  • 76. Kelley, L. M., Almeda, F. & Fritsch, P. W. A taxonomic revision of Mexican and Central American Symplocos (Symplocaceae). Phytotaxa 264, 1-115 (2016).
  • 77. Feinsinger, P., Beach, J. H.& Linhart, Y.B.Disturbance, pollinator predictability, and pollination success among Costa Rican cloud forest plants. Ecology 68, 1294-1305 (1987).
  • 78. Dilcher, D. Toward a new synthesis: Major evolutionary trends in the angiosperm fossil record. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 7030-7036 (2000).
  • 79. Barthel, H. J., McCoy, V.E. & Rust, J.From ultrastructure to bimolecular composition-Taphonomic patterns of tissue preservation in Arthropod inclusions in amber. In Fossilization-Understanding the Material Nature of Ancient Plants and Animals (eds Gee, C. T. et al.) 115-138 (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2021).
  • 80. Jiang, H. et al. Widespread mineralization of sof-bodied insects in Cretaceous amber. Geobiology 20, 363-376 (2022).
  • 81. Martinez-Delclos, X., Briggs, D. E.G. & Penalver, E.Taphonomy of insects in carbonates and amber.Palaeogeogr.Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 203, 19-64 (2004).
  • 82. Solorzano Kraemer, M. M., Kraemer, A. S., Stebner, F., Bickel, D. J. & Rust, J. Entrapment bias of Arthropods in Miocene amber revealed by trapping experiments in a tropical forest in Chiapas, Mexico. PLoS One 10, e0118820. https://doi.org/10.1371/journ al.pone.0118820 (2015).
  • 83. Solorzano Kraemer, M. M. et al. Arthropods in modern resins reveal if amber accurately recorded forest arthropod communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 6739-6744 (2018).
  • 84. Kosmowska-Ceranowicz, B. Bernstein. Faszinierende Fossile Harze aus aller Welt (Sax Verlag Beucha, 2020).
  • 85. De Franceschi, D., Dejax, J. & De Ploeg, G. Pollen extraction from amber (Sparnacian of Le Quesnoy, Paris Basin): Towards a new speciality in palaeo-palynology. C. R. Acad.Sci. Ser.IIA Earth Planet. Sci. 330, 227-233 (2000).
  • 86. Punt, W., Hoen, P. P., Blackmore, S., Nilsson, S.& Le Thomas, A.Glossary of pollen and spore terminology.Rev.Palaeobot.Palynol. 143, 1-81 (2007).
  • 87. Kosmowska-Ceranowicz, B., Kohlman-Adamska, A. & Grabowska, I. Erste Ergebnisse zur Lithologie und Palynologie der bernsteinfuhrenden Sedimente im Tagebau Primorskoje. Metalla 66, 5-17 (1997).
  • 88. Kasinski, J. R. & Kramarska, R.Sedimentary environment of amber-bearing association along the polish-Russian Baltic coastline. Exkurs. F.Veroffl. DGG 236, 46-57 (2008).
  • 89. Standke, G. Bitterfelder Bernstein gleich Baltischer Bernstein?-Eine geologische Raum-Zeit-Betrachtung und genetische Schlussfolgerungen.Exkurs. F.Veroffl.DGG 236, 11-33 (2008).
  • 90. Usaityte, D. The geology of the southeastern Baltic Sea: A review. Earth Sci. Rev.50, 137-225 (2000).
  • 91. Ritzkowski, S. K-Ar-Altersbestimmungen der bernsteinfuhrenden Sedimente des Samlandes (Palaogen, Bezirk Kaliningrad). Metalla 66, 19-23 (1997).
  • 92. Clauer, N., Huggett, J. M. & Hillier, S. How reliable is the K-Ar glauconite chronometer? A case study of Eocene sediments from the Isle of Wight. Clay Miner. 40, 167-176 (2005).
  • 93. Grimaldi, D. A. & Ross, A. J. Extraordinary Lagerstatten in Amber, with particular reference to the Cretaceous of Burma.In Terrestrial Conservation Lagerstatten: Windows into the Evolution of Life on Land (eds Fraser, N. C. & Sues, H.-D.) 287-342 (Dunedin Academic Press Ltd, 2017).
  • 94. Kasinski, J. R., Kramarska, R., Slodkowska, B., Sivkov, V.& Piwocki, M. Paleocene and Eocene deposits on the eastern margin of the Gulf of Gdansk (Yantarny P-1 borehole, Kaliningrad region, Russia). Geol. Q. 64, 29-53 (2020).
  • 95. Sadowski, E.-M. et al. Conservation, preparation and imaging of diverse ambers and their inclusions. Earth Sci. Rev. 220, 10365 (2021).
  • 96. Spongberg, S. A. A review of deciduous-leaved species of Stewartia (Theaceae). J.Arnold Arbor. 55, 182-214 (1974).
  • 97. Heo, K.-I., Lee, S., Lee, C. & Kim, S.-C. Generic delimitation and infrageneric classification of Stewartia and Hartia (Theaceae; Stewartieae): Insight from pollen morphology. Plant Syst. Evol.297, 33-50 (2011).