Published October 29, 2021 | Version v1
Journal article Open

French Cultural Studies: Features and Trends

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine

Description

The purpose of the article is to identify the features of French cultural studies, as well as to reveal the social nature of French culturology. Given the logic of this article, an important task is to demonstrate the development of French cultural research, to outline the features of the development of culturology in the French sociocultural space. The research methodology deals with the study of sources on the history of culturology in France and its place in the science system of this country. The author of the article applies an interdisciplinary approach and the guidelines of the assemblage theory. The scientific novelty of the article consists in determining the features of the development of cultural research in France. In particular, we are talking about finding a place for culturology and cultural research. This paper addresses the problematic issue of the specific character and significance of Études culturelles in the system of sciences in France. Conclusions. French cultural studies — Études culturelles — focuses on three key fields: art, writing, language. French culturologists are convinced that the linguistic environment cannot exist separately from society. Therefore, French research in the field of cultural studies balances between two areas: humanities and social science. In particular, the article demonstrates that French culturology is characterised by the following points: understanding of culture as a visible territory where the struggle to protect a certain idea of France continues; the emphasis on the concept of “nation”; the connection between the development of culture and educational reform; the creation of a universal system of national education by the state; attention to the development of language and literature. In France, cultural studies remains controversial, something poorly understood, because French thinkers are classics for these interdisciplinary humanities. The idea of resistance and “denial of culture” often comes to the fore. However, there is a theme that unites French culturologists: the criticism of relativism, which is attributed to culturology in the name of protecting the school.

Files

French_Cultural_Studies_Features_and_Trends.pdf

Files (399.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:151ef701e35dca7573642e762e3c0d2b
399.2 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Barclay, F. (2021). Postcolonial Realms of Memory: Sites and Symbols in Modern France. French Studies, 75(3), 420–421. https://doi.org/10.1093/fs/knab076 [in English].
  • Genin, Ch. (2006). Les études culturelles: une résistance française? [Cultural studies: French resistance?]. MEI, 24–25 (Études culturelles / Cultural Studies), 43–55 [in French].
  • Gingras, Y. (1991). L'institutionnalisation de la recherche en milieu universitaire et ses effets [The institutionalisation of research in universities and its effects]. Sociologie et sociétés, 23(1), 41–54 [in French].
  • Gingras, Y. (2004). Motiv radikalizma. O nekotorykh novykh tendentsiyakh v sotsiologii nauki i tekhnologii [The Motive of Radicalism. On some new trends in the sociology of science and technology. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 7(5), 75–98 http://bourdieu.name/files/Zhangra%20Iv.%20Motiv%20radikalizma%20(ZhSSA,%20 2004)(ru)(T)(24s).pdf [in Russian].
  • Godin, B., & Gingras, Y. (2000). The place of universities in the system of knowledge production. Research policy, 29(2), 273–278 [in English].
  • Kozlov, S. L. (2020). Implantatsiya. Ocherki genealogii istoriko-filologicheskogo znaniya vo Frantsii [Implantation. Essays on the genealogy of historical and philological knowledge in France]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [in Russian].
  • Lisovich, I. I. (2015). Skal'pel' razuma i kryl'ya voobrazheniya: Nauchnye diskursy v angliiskoi kul'ture rannego Novogo vremeni [The Scalpel of Reason and the Wings of the Imagination: Scientific Discourses in Early Modern English Culture]. Izdatel'skij dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki [in Russian].
  • Merton, R. (1993). Effekt Matfeya v nauke, II. Nakoplenie vygod i simvolika intellektual'noi sobstvennosti [The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property]. THESIS, 3, 256–276 [in Russian].
  • Merton, R. (2007). Nauka i obshchestvennyi poryadok [Science and social order]. Social Theory Issues, 1(1), 191–207. https://iphras.ru/uplfile/root/biblio/vst/2007/merton.pdf [in Russian].
  • Olivier-Utard, F. (2003). La dynamique d'un double hе́ritage. Les relations universitaireenterprise а̀ Strasbourg [The dynamics of a double inheritance. University-business relations in Strasbourg]. Actes de la recherché en sciences sociales, (148), 20–33 [in French].
  • Schinn, T. (2002). Nouvelle production du savoir et triple hе́lice. Tendances du prêt-а̀-penser les sciences [New production of knowledge and triple helix. Trends in ready-to-think science]. Actes de la recherché en sciences sociales, (141–142), 21–30 [in French].
  • Sclove, R. E. (2000). Town Meetings on Technology: Consensus Conferences as Democratic Participation. In D. L. Kleinman (Ed.), Science, Technology and Democracy (pp. 33–48). State University of New York Press [in English].
  • Shehavtsova, S. (2020). Linhvokulturolohichna kompetentnist maibutnikh fakhivtsiv yak kliuchova u suchasnomu osvitnomu prostori [Linguo-cultural competence of future specialists as a key in the modern educational space]. Bulletin of Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University. Pedagogical Sciences, 2(333), 2, 72–79 [in Ukrainian].
  • Thackray, A. (1980). History of science. In P. T. Durbin (Ed.), A Guide to the Culture of Science, Technology, and Medicine (pp. 3–69). Free Press [in English].
  • Veber, M. (1990). Izbrannye trudy [Selected Works]. Progress [in Russian].