Published October 10, 2019 | Version v1

Peromyscus sonoriensis

  • 1. Department of Biological Sciences and the Museum Texas Tech University Lubbock, TX 79409 - 3131
  • 2. Department of Biological Sciences Texas Tech University Lubbock, TX 79409 - 3131

Description

Peromyscus sonoriensis (LeConte)

Hesp [eromys] sonoriensis Le Conte, 1853:413.

Hesperomys austerus Baird, 1855:336.

Mus bairdii Hoy and Kennicott, 1857:92.

Hesperomys sonoriensis var. nebrascensis Coues, 1877:79.

Hesperomys leucopus arcticus Mearns, 1890:285

Hesperomys leucopus nebrascensis Mearns, 1890:285.

Hesperomys leucopus deserticolus Mearns, 1890:287.

Hesperomys leucopus rufinus Merriam, 1890:65.

Peromyscus texanus nebrascensis J. A. Allen, 1896:251.

Sitomys americanus artemisiae Rhoads, 1894:260.

Sitomys insolatus Rhoads, 1894:256.

Peromyscus michiganensis pallescens J. A. Allen, 1896:238.

Peromyscus texanus saturatus Bangs, 1897:75.

Peromyscus texanus subarcticus J. A. Allen, 1899:15.

Peromyscus akeleyi Elliot, 1899:226.

Peromyscus maniculatus arcticus Osgood, 1900:33.

Peromyscus oreas rubidus Osgood, 1901a:193.

Peromyscus perimekurus Elliot, 1903:156.

Peromyscus oresterus Elliot, 1903:159.

Peromyscus luteus Osgood, 1905:77.

Peromyscus maniculatus artemisiae Osgood, 1909:58.

Peromyscus maniculatus saturatus Osgood, 1909:61.

Peromyscus maniculatus hollisteri Osgood, 1909:62.

Peromyscus maniculatus austerus Osgood, 1909:63.

Peromyscus maniculatus rubidus Osgood, 1909:65.

Peromyscus maniculatus rufinus Osgood, 1909:72.

Peromyscus maniculatus nebrascensis Osgood, 1909:75.

Peromyscus maniculatus luteus Osgood, 1909:77.

Peromyscus maniculatus bairdi Osgood, 1909:79.

Peromyscus maniculatus pallescens Osgood, 1909:83.

Peromyscus maniculatus sonoriensis Osgood, 1909:89.

Peromyscus maniculatus borealis Mearns, 1911:102.

Peromyscus maniculatus nebrascensis Mearns, 1911:102.

Peromyscus maniculatus osgoodi Mearns, 1911:102.

Peromyscus maniculatus angustus Hall, 1932:423.

Peromyscus maniculatus ozarkiarum Black, 1935:144.

Peromyscus maniculatus gunnisoni Goldman, 1937:224.

Peromyscus maniculatus alpinus Cowan, 1937:215.

Peromyscus maniculatus georgiensis Hall, 1938:455.

Peromyscus maniculatus serratus Davis, 1939:290.

Peromyscus maniculatus inclarus Goldman, 1939:355.

Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii McCabe and Cowan, 1945:197.

Peromyscus maniculatus saxamans McCabe and Cowan, 1945:198.

Holotype. —United States National Museum (catalog number 146); adult, sex unknown, skin and skull.

Type locality. — Mexico; Sonora; Santa Cruz; collected on 28 September 1851 by J. H. Clark.

Subspecies. —Although we were not able to examine all of the recognized subspecies that potentially are referable to P. maniculatus, we tentatively assign the following 15 subspecies recognized in Hall (1981) and Hogan et al. (1993) to P. sonoriensis: alpinus, artemisiase, austerus, borealis, hollisteri, inclarus, luteus, nebrascensis, ozarkiarum, pallescens, rubidus, rufinus, saturatus, saxamans, serratus, and sonoriensis.

Diagnosis. —Coloration varies greatly between subspecies (austerus darker in color whereas pallescens is much paler than other subspecies), however, most adults are ochraceous buff (Osgood 1909). Size small for species group, especially relative to length of the tail; measurements obtained from Osgood (1909) for several of the subspecies now assigned to P. sonoroensis, indicated a total length averaging 151 mm; (range 126–176 mm) and tail length averaging 65.5 mm (range 56–75 mm). Tail tends to be more thickly haired and more sharply bicolored (Osgood 1909) than other species in the group.

In this study, Cyt b sequences indicated that P. sonoriensis differed from P. gambelii, P. melanotis, P. polionotus, P. sejugis, and P. maniculatus (sensu stricto), by 4.55%, 6.02%, 4.71%, 4.42%, and 4.68%, respectively. Genetic differentiation (= 1.27%) based on DNA sequences obtained from 186 individuals of P. sonoriensis. This species exhibited a moderate level of genetic divergence even though it possesses the broadest geographic distribution of the P. maniculatus species group.

Distribution. —Occurs primarily west of the Mississippi River from the Yukon and Northwest Territory southward to northern California and the United States/Mexico border (along Arizona and New Mexico) then eastward across northern Texas to Arkansas. The distribution of P. sonoriensis does not include: 1) the coastal islands and mainlands fromAlaska southward to Oregon; in this area P. keeni may exclude P. sonoriensis or the two species may be sympatric; 2) southcentral California and Baja California and the southwest corner of Arizona where P. gambelii occurs; and 3) southern New Mexico, and southwestern of Texas where P. labecula occurs. Populations of mice that are assignable to P. sonoriensis appear to occur on Isle Royale, Michigan (Dragoo et al. 2006; this study) and in southern Michigan (Lansman et al. 1983); whereas samples from northcentral Michigan are assignable to P. maniculatus (Lansman et al. 1983). Additional samples are needed from much of the Great Lakes region to resolve this conundrum.

Comparisons. —A member of the P. maniculatus species group. Similar in coloration but smaller in size compared to other members of the P. maniculatus species group. Specimens from the Pacific Northwest are darker in pelage color (more similar to P. keeni) than those occurring in the central and eastern portions of the continent exhibit. Differs from P. keeni in external measurements such as tail length (averaging <100 mm compared to an average length> 100 mm in P. keeni).

Remarks. —Two seventy-two samples examined were assigned to P. sonoriensis. Of these samples, the closest examined herein (Grant County, New Mexico) was approximately 200 km northeast of the type locality in Santa Cruz, Sonora.

Chromosomal data are highly variable for this group with a broad range of FNs (72–86) with some well-studied subspecies, such as P. m. bardii, reported as highly polymorphic (74–85). A trend in the data suggest that lower FNs (72–80) for this species occur in the Pacific Northwest, where populations exist in sympatry with P. keeni (Gunn and Greenbaum et al. 1986; Gunn 1988; Hogan et al. 1993). The FNs reported for P. sonoriensis span the ranges reported for P. gambelii, P. labecula, and P. maniculatus; but differ substantially from those observed for P. melanotis (FN = 62, Hsu and Arrighi 1968; Bowers et al. 1973), P. polionotus (FN = 69–71, Te and Dawson 1971), and P. sejugis (FN = 76, Smith et al. 2000).

Several previous studies (Dragoo et al. 2006, Gering et al. 2009, Kalkvik et al. 2012, Natarajan et al. 2015, Sawyer et al. 2017, and Greenbaum et al. 2017 indicated that populations of P. maniculatus in the eastern regions of the United States were genetically divergent from central and western populations. Similarly, DNA sequence data (Cyt b gene), presented herein, suggest elevation to species status that would include 17 currently recognized subspecies of P. maniculatus. This population encompasses the largest geographic area of any clade recovered in this study. Divergence dates suggest P. sonoriensis last shared a common ancestor with the lineage giving rise to P. polionotus approximately 1.40 mya.

As discussed earlier, P. sonoriensis appears to be sympatric with samples of P. gambelii in western Nevada (NAS Fallon Air Force Base) and at two separate localities in east-central California (one in Mono County and one in Tuolumne County). Further, P. sonoriensis appears to be sympatric with samples of P. labecula in southcentral New Mexico (6.2 mi NW of Timberon). Additional data are need from these areas to determine if these genetic species (see Bradley and Baker 2001; Baker and Bradley 2006) are behaving as biological species (Mayr 1942) as well as genetic species.

Notes

Published as part of Bradley, Robert D., Francis, James Q., Platt II, Roy N., Soniat, Taylor J., Alvarez, Daysi & Lindsey, Laramie L., 2019, Mitochondrial Dna Sequence Data Indicate Evidence For Multiple Species Within Peromyscus Maniculatus, pp. 1-59 in Special Publications of the Museum of Texas Tech University 70 on pages 26-27, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7221903

Files

Files (9.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:3e9e4b378dcc28defdc09c85cee051d6
9.5 kB Download

System files (87.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:274cf40508ed19eae4c1b308a5905483
87.6 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Related works

Biodiversity

Event date
1851-09-28
Verbatim event date
1851-09-28
Scientific name authorship
Le Conte
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
Chordata
Order
Rodentia
Family
Cricetidae
Genus
Peromyscus
Species
sonoriensis
Taxon rank
species
Type status
Holotype
Taxonomic concept label
Peromyscus sonoriensis (Conte, 1853) sec. Bradley, Francis, II, Soniat, Alvarez & Lindsey, 2019

References

  • Le Conte, J. 1853. Descriptions of three new species of American Arvicolae, with remarks upon some other American rodents. Proceedings of theAcademy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 5: 404 - 415.
  • Baird, S. F. 1855. Characteristics of some new species of North American Mammalia, collected chiefly in connection with the U. S. Surveys of a railroad route to the Pacific. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 7: 333 - 336.
  • Hoy, P. R., and R. Kennicott. 1857. Kennicott, Agricultural Report, U. S. Patent Office Pp 92 - 95.
  • Coues, E. 1877. Muridae. Monographs of North American Rodentia. Report of the U. S. Geological Survey of the Territories Pp III - 264.
  • Mearns, E. A. 1890. Description of supposed new species and subspecies of mammals, from Arizona. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 2: 277 - 307.
  • Merriam, C. H. 1890. Results of a biological survey of the San Francisco Mountain region and desert of the Little Colorado in Arizona, with notes on their vertical distribu- tion and descriptions of new species. North American Fauna 3: 64 - 66.
  • Allen, J. A. 1896. Descriptions of new North American mammals. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 8: 233 - 252.
  • Rhoads, S. N. 1894. Descriptions of four new species and two subspecies of white-footed mice from the United States and British Columbia. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 48: 253 - 261.
  • Bangs, O. 1897. General Notes: Zoology. The American Naturalist 31: 66 - 79.
  • Allen, J. A. 1899. Descriptions of five new American rodents. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 12: 11 - 17.
  • Elliot, D. G. 1899. Preliminary descriptions of new rodents from the Olympic Mountains. Field Columbian Museum Zoological Series 11: 225 - 228.
  • Osgood, W. H. 1900. Results of a biological reconnoissance of the Yukon River region. North American Fauna 19: 1 - 20.
  • Osgood, W. H. 1901 a. A new white-footed mouse from California. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 14: 193 - 194.
  • Elliot, D. G. 1903. A list of a collection of Mexican mammals with descriptions of some apparently new forms. Field Columbian Museum Publications 71, Zoology Series 3: 141 - 149.
  • Osgood, W. H. 1905. A new name for the Peromyscus nebrascensis of certain authors. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 18: 78.
  • Osgood, W. H. 1909. Revision of the Mice of the American Genus Peromyscus. NorthAmerican Fauna 28: 1 - 285.
  • Mearns, E. A. 1911. New names for two subspecies of Peromyscus maniculatus (Wagner). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 24: 101 - 102.
  • Hall, E. R. 1932. Remarks on the affinities of the mammalian fauna of Vancouver Island, British Columbia, with descriptions of new subspecies. University of California Publications in Zoology 38: 415 - 423.
  • Black, J. D. 1935. A new race of Peromyscus maniculatus from Arkansas. Journal of Mammalogy 16: 144 - 145.
  • Goldman, E. A. 1937. Four new mammals from Utah. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 50: 221 - 226.
  • Cowan, I. M. 1937. A new race of Peromyscus maniculatus from British Columbia. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 50: 215 - 216.
  • Hall, E. R. 1938. Variation among insular mammals of Georgia Strait, British Columbia. The American Naturalist 72: 453 - 463.
  • Davis, W. B. 1939. The recent mammals of Idaho. Caxton Printers, Caldwell Idaho.
  • Goldman, E. A. 1939. Nine new mammals from islands in Great Salt Lake, Utah. Journal of Mammalogy 20: 351 - 357.
  • McCabe, T. T., and I. M. Cowan. 1945. Peromyscus maniculatus macrorhinus and the problem of insularity. Transactions of the Royal Canadian Institute 25: 117 - 215.
  • Hall, E. R. 1981. The mammals of North America. 2 nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York 1181 pp.
  • Hogan, K. M., M. C. Hedin, H. S. Koh, S. K. Davis, and I. F. Greenbaum. 1993. Systematic and taxonomic implications of karyotypic, electrophoretic, and mitochondrial- DNA variation in Peromyscus from the Pacific Northwest. Journal of Mammalogy 74: 819 - 831.
  • Dragoo, J. W., J. A. Lackey, K. E. Moore, E. P. Lessa, J. A. Cook, and T. L. Yates. 2006. Phylogeography of the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) provides a predictive framework for hantaviruses. Journal of General Virology 87: 1997 - 2003.
  • Lansman, R. A., J. C. Avise, C. F. Aquadro, J. F. Shapira, and S. W. Daniel. 1983. Extensive genetic variation in mitochondrial DNA's among geographic populations of the deer mouse, Peromyscus maniculatus. Evolution 37: 1 - 16.
  • Gunn, S. J., and I. F. Greenbaum. 1986. Systematic implications of karyotypic and morphologic variation in mainland Peromyscus from the Pacific Northwest. Journal of Mammalogy 67: 294 - 304.
  • Gunn, S. J. 1988. Chromosomal variation and differentiation among insular populations of Peromyscus from the Pacific Northwest. Canadian Journal of Zoology 66: 2726 - 2733.
  • Hsu, T. C., and F. E. Arrighi. 1968. Chromosomes of Peromyscus (Rodentia, Cricetidae). I. Evolutionary trends in 20 species. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 7: 417 - 446.
  • Bowers, J. H., R. J. Baker, and M. H. Smith. 1973. Chromosomal, electrophoretic, and breeding studies of selected populations of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) and black-eared mice (P. melanotis). Evolution 27: 378 - 386.
  • Te, G. A., and W. D. Dawson. 1971. Chromosomal poly- morphism in Peromyscus polionotus. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 10: 225 - 234.
  • Smith, L. R., D. W. Hale, and I. F. Greenbaum. 2000. Systematic implications of chromosomal data from two insular spe- cies of Peromyscus from the Gulf of California. Journal of Heredity 91: 162 - 165.
  • Gering, E. J., J. C. Opazo, and J. F. Storz. 2009. Molecular evolution of cytochrome b in high-and low-altitude deer mice (genus Peromyscus). Heredity 102: 226 - 235.
  • Kalkvik, H. M., I. J. Stout, T. J. Doonan, and C. L. Parkinson. 2012. Investigating niche and lineage diversification in widely distributed taxa: phylogeography and ecological niche modeling of the Peromyscus maniculatus species group. Ecography 35: 54 - 64.
  • Natarajan, C., F. G. Hoffman, H. C. Lanier, C. J. Wolf, A. Cheviron, M. L. Spangler, R. E. Weber, A. Fargo, and J. F. Storz. 2015. Intraspecific polymorphism, interspecific divergence and the origins of function-altering mutations in deer mouse hemoglobin. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32: 978 - 997.
  • Sawyer, Y. E., M. J. Flamme, T. S. Jung, S. O. MacDonald, and J. A. Cook. 2017. Diversification of deermice (Rodentia: genus Peromyscus) at their north-western range limit: genetic consequences of refugial and island isolation. Journal of Biogeography 44: 1572 - 1585.
  • Greenbaum, I. F., S. E. Chirhart, M. L. Walker, and R. L. Honeycutt. 2017. Molecular phylogenetics of western deer mice (Peromyscus): Taxonomic and biogeographic implications. The Southwestern Naturalist 62: 129 - 137.
  • Bradley, R. D., and R. J. Baker. 2001. A test of the genetic species concept: cytochrome-b sequences and mammals. Journal of Mammalogy 82: 960 - 973.
  • Baker, R. J., and R. D. Bradley. 2006. Speciation in mammals and the genetic species concept. Journal of Mammal- ogy 87: 643 - 662.
  • Mayr, E. W. 1942. Systematics and the origin of species, from the viewpoint of a zoologist. Harvard University Press.