Published October 5, 2022 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Terminalinus Hopkins 1915

  • 1. Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, 288 Farm Lane, 243 Natural Science Bldg., East Lansing, MI 48824, USA. smith 462 @ msu. edu; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0002 - 5173 - 3736
  • 2. 161 / 2 Mu 5, Soi Wat Pranon, T. Donkaew, A. Maerim, Chiangmai 50180, Thailand.
  • 3. Agricultural Innovation and Management Division, Faculty of Natural Resources, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand. wanakorn 62 @ hotmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 6200 - 1285 & Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, 288 Farm Lane, 243 Natural Science Bldg., East Lansing, MI 48824, USA. cognato @ msu. edu; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 6436 - 2447

Description

Terminalinus Hopkins, 1915 stat. res.

Terminalinus Hopkins, 1915: 57.

Type species. Terminalinus terminaliae Hopkins, 1915.

Fortiborus Hulcr & Cognato 2010: 17. syn. nov.

Type species. Xyleborus major Stebbing, 1909.

Remarks. Hopkins (1915) erected Terminalinus for two Philippine species described from singleton specimens, T. terminaliae and T. dipterocarpi Hopkins, 1915, and defined his genus as having a 5-segmented funicle; club wider than long, anterior face with two bisinuate sutures, posterior face with one procurved suture; eyes large, coarse, elliptical, acutely emarginate. Schedl (1952b: 162) examined a severely damaged specimen and a single elytron of purported T. terminaliae specimens but did not state how this species was identified. Based on his observations, he placed the genus in synonymy with Xyleborus Eichhoff, 1864. Later in a paper on American Scolytidae, Wood (1986: 267) examined the T. terminaliae holotype, compared it to species in his collection, concluded the genus was valid, and included an additional nine species (many treated below). In their catalog of the world fauna, Wood & Bright (1992) omitted Wood’s (1986) recognition of Terminalinus and references of these combinations, and the included species were moved to Cyclorhipidion and Xyleborus without comment. Likely due to this catalog omission, and Wood’s (1986) recognition of the Indo-Malayan Terminalinus in a paper on the American fauna, this prior taxonomic action was not rediscovered by subsequent researchers. Unaware of this past action, Hulcr & Cognato (2010) erected a new genus, Fortiborus (2010), for the same species group but did not include T. terminaliae. Our examination of the T. terminaliae holotype (NMNH) shows that it unambiguously fits the concept of Fortiborus and therefore we place Fortiborus in synonymy with the older name, Terminalinus. The generic diagnoses of both genera also overlap.

The diagnosis of Terminalinus is that of Fortiborus given by Hulcr & Cognato (2010) and elaborated upon by Smith et al. (2020a). Species of Terminalinus are distinguished by their large size, 4.4−7.1 mm; pronotum robust, elytral declivity flattened and broadened laterally, apex angulate; anterior edge of pronotum extended anteriad, bearing a distinct row of serrations; antennal club distinctly pubescent, type 4; eyes very large, deeply emarginate, apex often acute; scutellum flat, flush with elytra; procoxae contiguous; and mycangial tufts absent.

Notes

Published as part of Smith, Sarah M., Beaver, Roger A. & Sittichaya, Wisut, 2022, One hundred eighteen taxonomic changes among Xyleborine ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), pp. 151-175 in Zootaxa 5194 (2) on pages 166-167, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5194.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/7147098

Files

Files (3.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:36a5dfde857831fa5de717199bdcb5b3
3.1 kB Download

System files (22.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:97bf8f9ebff9dc7c56d08d05ad204140
22.2 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Scientific name authorship
Hopkins
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
Arthropoda
Order
Coleoptera
Family
Curculionidae
Genus
Terminalinus
Taxon rank
genus
Taxonomic concept label
Terminalinus Hopkins, 1915 sec. Smith, Beaver & Sittichaya, 2022

References

  • Hopkins, A. D. (1915) Classification of the Cryphalinae with descriptions of new genera and species. United States Department of Agriculture, Report No. 99. Government Printing Office, Washington, 75 pp, 4 pls. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 65905
  • Hulcr, J. & Cognato, A. I. (2010) New genera of Palaeotropical Xyleborini (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) based on congruence between morphological and molecular characters. Zootaxa, 2717 (1), 1 - 33. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 2717.1.1
  • Stebbing, E. P. (1909) On some undescribed Scolytidae of economic importance from the Indian Region, II. Indian Forest Memoirs, 1, 13 - 32.
  • Schedl, K. E. (1952 b) Zur synonymie der Borkenkafer I. 121. Beitrag zur Morphologie und Systematik der Scolytoidea. Entomologische Blatter, 47 / 48, 158 - 164.
  • Eichhoff, W. J. (1864) Uber die Mundtheile und die Fuhlerbildung der europaischen Xylophagi sens strict. Berliner Entomologische Zeitschrift, 8, 17 - 46.
  • Wood, S. L. (1986) New synonymy and new species of American bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), Part XI. The Great Basin Naturalist, 46, 265 - 273.
  • Wood, S. L. & Bright, D. E. (1992) A catalog of Scolytidae and Platypodidae (Coleoptera), Part 2: Taxonomic index. The Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs, 13, 1 - 1553.
  • Smith, S. M, Beaver, R. A. & Cognato, A. I. (2020 a) A monograph of the Xyleborini (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Scolytinae) of the Indochinese Peninsula (except Malaysia) and China. ZooKeys, 983, 1 - 442. https: // doi. org / 10.3897 / zookeys. 983.52630.