Seminarium „Naukoznawstwo: historia i współczesność” / Seminar “Science of science: history and today”.
Published December 17, 2021 | Version v1
Presentation Open

Boris Hessen i paradoksalna historia historiografii nauki / Boris Hessen and the paradoxical history of the historiography of science

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Instytut Historii Nauki PAN

Description

Prezentacje opisuje postać Borisa Hessena i paradoksalną recepcję jego poglądów w Rosji i w krajach zachodnich.  

The presentation describes the figure of Boris Hessen and the paradoxical reception of his views in Russia and in Western countries.

Files

M.Kokowski-Hessen-Krakow-Warszawa-17-XII-2021-pl.pdf

Files (1.5 MB)

Additional details

References

  • Aronova, Elena 2011: The politics and contexts of Soviet science studies (Naukovedenie): Soviet philosophy of science at the crossroads. Studies of East European Thought 63, pp. 175–202. DOI: 10.1007/s11212-011-9146-y. Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41477730.
  • Aronova, Elena 2021: Scientific History: Experiments in History and Politics from the Bolshevik Revolution to the End of the Cold War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Bernal, John Desmond 1931: Science and society. Sресtаtоr № 5376 (11 July 1931). http://archive.spectator.co.uk/article/11th-july-1931/7/science-and-society&usg=AOvVaw1pxlDNrmyoCe2M-zAHIYAt
  • Bernal, John Desmond 1936(?): Engels and Science. Labour Monthly Pamphlets 6. Available online: https://www.marxists.org/archive/bernal/works/1930s/engels.htm.
  • Bernal, John Desmond 1939 (1967): The Social Function of Science. London: . (reprinted Cambridge, Mass., 1967).
  • Bernal, John Desmond 1952: Marx and Science. "Marxism Today Series" No. 9.
  • Bernal, John Desmond 1953: Stalin as Scientist. Modern Quarterly 8(3). URL: http://mugu.com/haldane/bernal/bernal-1953-stalin-as-scientist.html.
  • Bernal, John D.; Mackay, Alan L. 1966: Towards a Science of Science. Organon 3, pp. 9‒17 [Lecture presented at the Opening Session of the XIth International Congress of the History of Science, Warsaw August 24, 1965]. URL: https://bazhum.muzhp.pl/media/files/Organon/Organon-r1966-t3/Organon-r1966-t3-s9-17/Organon-r1966-t3-s9-17.pdf.
  • Birkenmajer, Ludwik 1897: Wiadomość o postępie prac krakowskiej komisji akademickiej, zajmującej się wydaniem dzieł, biografii i bibliografii Mikołaja Kopernika. Wiadomości Matematyczne 1(4-5), ss. 178-182. URL: https://crispa.uw.edu.pl/api/object/322254/data/download?s3Key=a1cca9be-71d1-4ad7-a68f-6f09d6e86466./efcb6e9a-f50a-4957-aead-430eddc67730.pdf.
  • Borichevskij, Ivan Adamovič 1926/2013: Naukovedenie kak tochnaja nauka. Vestnik znanija № 12. Reprinted in Sociology of Science and Technology 4(3), pp. 11‒17. Available online: http://sst.nw.ru/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/naukovedenie-kak-tochnaya-nauka.pdf.
  • Bukharin 1921/1925, 1927: Tieorija istoriczeskogo matierializma. Popularnyj uczebnik marksistskoj socjologii. Moskva /1925: Historical Materialism: A System of Sociology. New York: International Publishers. URL: https://www.marxists.org/archive/bukharin/works/1921/histmat/index.htm / 1927: Teorja materjalizmu historycznego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo "Książka".
  • Bukharin, N. I.; et al. 1931 / 2nd ed. 1971 (repr. 2017): Science at the Cross Roads: Papers Presented to the International Congress of the History of Science and Technology Held in London from June 29th to July 3rd, 1931 by the Delegates of the U.S.S.R. London: Kniga (England) Limited. Available online: https://ia801602.us.archive.org/34/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.51669/2015.51669.Science-At-The-Cross-Roads-1931.pdf. / 2nd ed. 1971: With a new Foreword by Joseph Needham (pp. vii-x) and a new Introduction by Gary Werskey (pp. xi-xxix). "The Social History of Science" 23. London: Frank Cass & Co. Reprinted in 2017: "Routledge Revivals", Routledge.
  • Bunge, Mario 2013: The Sociology-Philosophy Connection. With a foreword by Raymond Boudon. "Science and Technology Studies". New Brunswick (U.S.A.), London (U.K.): Transaction Publishers. URL: https://books.google.pl/books?id=k5IwZv2QDzMC.
  • Cipolla, Carlo M. 1987: The basic laws of human stupidity. Illustrations by James Donnelly. Whole Earth Review Spring 1987, pp. 2‒7. URL: http://harmful.cat-v.org/people/basic-laws-of-human-stupidity/.
  • Clark, G.N. 1937a: Social and Economic Aspects of Science. Economic History 3; reprinted as a chapter 3 in Clark 1937b, pp. 60‒91.
  • Clark, G.N. 1937b: Science and Social Welfare in the Age of Newton. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Cohen, I. Bernard (ed.) 1990: Puritanism and the Rise of modern Science. The Merton Thesis. New Brunswick, NJ & London: Rutgers University Press.
  • Cohen, Stephen F. 1970: Marxist Theory and Bolshevik Policy: The Case of Bukharin's Historical Materialism. Political Science Quarterly 85(1), Mar., 1970, pp. 40-60. DOI: 10.2307/2147557. STABLE URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2147557.
  • Cohen, Steven F. 1971: Bukharin and the Bolshevik Revolution A Political Biography 1888‒1938. New York: Vintage Books.
  • Cohen, Steven F. 1984: Rethinking the Soviet Experience. Politics and history since 1917. New York—Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Crowther, James Gerald 1941 (repr. 1967): The Social Relations of Science. London: Macmillan.
  • Dennis, M. A. (1997). Historiography of science: An American perspective. In J. Krige, & D. Pestre (Eds.), Science in the twentieth century (pp. 1–26). Amsterdam: Harwood.
  • Dobrov, G. M. 1973: Science Policy and Assessment in the Soviet Union. International Social Science Journal XXV (3), pp. 305–325.
  • Freudenthal, Gideon; Mclaughlin, Peter 2009: Classical Marxist Historiography of Science: The Hessen-Grossman-Thesis. [In:] Hessen, Grossmann 2009, pp. 1‒40.
  • Gerovitch, Slava 1996: Perestroika of the History of Technology and Science in the USSR: Changes in the Discourse. Technology and Culture 37(1), pp. 102‒134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3107203. Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3107203.
  • Gerovitch, Slava 1997–2002: Virtual Guide to the History of Russian Science and Technology. URL: https://web.mit.edu/slava/guide/Biblio/2.htm.
  • Гиндилис, Наталья Львовна 2011: Становление науковедения в СССР (середина 60-х годов ХХ В.). Науковедческие исследования №2011, cc. 217‒272. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/stanovlenie-naukovedeniya-v-sssr-seredina-60-h-godov-hh-v (дата обращения: 18.11.2021).
  • Гиндилис, Наталья Львовна 2011b: Науковедение глазами его создателей. Вестник Инстита Социологии 2, pp. 149‒159. URL: https://www.vestnik-isras.ru/files/File/Vestnik_2011_02/Gindilis.pdf.
  • Гиндилис, Наталья Львовна 2014: С. А. Кугель и науковедение. Социология Науки и Технологий 5(4), pp. 22‒25. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/s-a-kugel-i-naukovedenie/pdf.
  • Гиндилис, Наталья Львовна 2015: Становление и развитие науковедения в ХХ веке. Sociology of Science and Technology 6(1), pp. 98‒104. URL: http://sst.nw.ru/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/stanovlenie-i-razvitie-naukovedeniya-v-hh-veke.pdf.
  • Goldsmith, Maurice 1967: The Science of Science. Journal of the Royal Society of Arts 115(5131), June 1967, pp. 518‒532. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41371619.
  • Goldsmith, Maurice; Mackay, Alan (eds.) 1964: The Science of Science: Society in Technological Age. London: Souvenir Press Ltd. / Russian translation: Столетов, В.Н. (ред.) 1966: Наука о науке: (Сборник статей): Перевод с английского. Общ. ред. и послесл. В.Н. Столетова.
  • Graham, Loren R. 1964: Bukharin and the planning of science. The Russian Review 23(2), pp. 135‒148. DOI: 10.2307/126518. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/126518.
  • Graham, Loren R. 1967: The Soviet Academy of Sciences and the Communist Party, 1927‒1932. Princeton.
  • Graham, Loren R. 1975: The development of science policy in the Soviet Union. [In:] T. Dixon Long, Christopher Wright (eds.), Science pocies in Industrial Nations. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1975, p. 12‒58.
  • Graham, Loren R. 1985: The socio-political roots of Boris Hessen: Soviet Marxism and the History of Science. Social Studies of Science 15, pp. 705‒722. Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/285401.
  • Grehem, Loren [Graham, Loren R.] 1993: Sotsial'no-politicheskii kontekst doklada B. M. Gessena o N'iutone. Voprosy Istorii Estestvoznaniia i Tekhni 2, pp. 20-31.
  • Grossmann, Henryk 1935: The Social Foundation of Mechanistic Philosophy and Manufacture.
  • Haldane, John B.S. 1938: The Marxist Philosophy and the Sciences. London: Allen and Unwin.
  • Hall, A. Ruppert 1949: Ballistics in the 17th century: A study of the relations of science and war, with reference principally to England. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.
  • Hall, A. Ruppert 1952: History of Science Committee. Report on activities, 1936–1952. Whipple Museum Papers, Whipple Museum for the History of Science, C63.
  • Hall, A. Ruppert 1963: Merton revisited or science and society in the seventeenth century. History of Science 2, pp. 1–16.
  • Hall, A. Ruppert 1969: Can the history of science be history? British Journal for the History of Science 4(3), pp. 207–220. DOI: 10.1017/s0007087400009924.
  • Hall, A. Rupert 1975: Review of Science at the Cross Roads. Papers Presented to the International Congress of the History of Science and Technology, 1931. By the Delegates of the U. S. S. R. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 26 (3), pp. 265–267. DOI:10.1093/bjps/26.3.265. JSTOR: https://www.jstor.org/stable/686284.
  • Hessen, Boris 1927a: Predislovie k stat'iam A. Einshteina i Dzh. Dzh. Tomsona. Pod znamenem marksizma 4, pp. 152‒165. English translation by Sean Winkler available online: https://socpol.uvvg.ro/docs/2019-1/5.Hessen.pdf.
  • Hessen, Boris 1927b/2021: Marian Smolukhovskii (k desiatiletiiu so dnia smerti). Pod znamenem marksizma 9, 144‒148. English translation in Talbot, Pattison (eds., translators) 2021, pp. 61‒67.
  • Hessen, Boris 1928a: Mekhanicheskii materializm i sovremennaia fizyka. Pod znamenem marksizma 7/8 pp. 5‒47.
  • Hessen, Boris 1928b: Osnovnye idei teorii otnosite'nosti. Moscow: Moscow Worker.
  • Hessen, Boris 1929a: Idealisticheskie techeniia v sovremennoi fizike i bor'ba s nimi. Molodaia gvardiia 3.
  • Hessen, Boris 1929b: Teoretiko-veroiatnostnoe obosnovanie ergodicheskoi gipotezy. Uspekhifizicheskikh nauk 9, pp. 600‒629.
  • Hessen, Boris 1929c: Statisticheskii metod v fizike i novoe obosnovanie teorii veroiatnostei R. Mizesam. Estestvoznanie i marksizm 1, pp. 3‒58.
  • Hessen, B.; Egorshin, V.P. 1927a: Piatyi s'ezd russkikh fizikov. Pod znamenem marksizma 1.
  • Hessen, B.; Egorshin, V.P. 1927b: Ob otnoshenii tov. Timiriazeva k sovremennoi nauke. Pod znamenem marksizma 2‒3, pp. 188‒199.
  • Hessen, B.; Luppol, I.K. 1928a: O kruzhkakh po izucheniiu dialekticheskogo materializma sredi molodykh nauchnykh rabotnikov. Kommunisticheskaia revoliutsiia 14.
  • Hessen, B.; Podvolotskii, I. 1929: Filosofskie korni pravogo opportunizma. Pod znamenem marksizma 9, pp. 1‒29.
  • Hessen, Boris 1931: The Social and Economic Roots of Newton's Principia. [In:] Nicolai I. Bukharin et al., Science at the Crossroads. London 1931. Available online: https://surplusvalue.org.au/Science_Environment/Hessen%20Social%20&%20Economic%20Roots%20Newtons%20Principia.pdf. (Reprint New York 1971), pp. 151–212. Russian original available online: http://www.ihst.ru/projects/sohist/books/hessen.pdf.
  • Hessen, Boris; Grossmann, Henryk 2009: The social and economic roots of the scientific revolution. Edited by Gideon Freudenthal and Peter Mclaughlin. Springer. "Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science" vol. 278.
  • Ienna, Gerardo; Rispoli, Giulia 2019: Boris Hessen at the Crossroads of Science and Ideology. Society and Politics 13 (1(25)), pp. 37–63. Available online: https://www.academia.edu/39159699.
  • Il'ichev, F.; Fedoseyev, P.N. 1983: Naukovedenie. [In:] Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'. Mockva: Sovetckaya Entsiklopediya, pp. 406‒407. / Ильичев, Ф.; Федосеев, П.Н. 1983: Науковедениe. [B:] Философский энциклопедический словарь. Мocквa: Совeтcкaя Энциклопедия, cc. 406-407.
  • Joravsky, David 1955: Soviet Views on the History of Science. Isis 46(1), pp. 3‒13. DOI: 10.2307/226819. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/226819.
  • Joravsky, David 1961 (2009): Soviet Marxism and Natural Science, 1917‒1932. London: Rutledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Josephson, Paul R. 1988: Science Policy in the Soviet Union, 1917‒1927. Minerva 26(3), September 1988, pp. 342‒369. DOI: 10.1007/bf01096401. Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41820731.
  • Josephson, Paul 1991: Physics and Politics in Revolutionary Russia. Berkeley, Los Angeles, Oxford: University of California Press. "California Studies in the History of Science" vol. 7.
  • Klein, Ursula 2016: Kuhn in the Cold War. [In:] Alexander Blum, Kostas Gavroglu, Christian Joas and Jürgen Renn (eds.): Shifting Paradigms: Thomas S. Kuhn and the History of Science. "Max Planck Research Library for the History and Development of Knowledge Proceedings" 8. URL: http://edition-open-access.de/proceedings/8/; https://www.mprl-series.mpg.de/media/proceedings/8/9/Proc8chap7.pdf.
  • Kojevnikov, Alexei 2008: The Phenomenon of Soviet Science. Osiris 23(1), "Intelligentsia Science: The Russian Century, 1860‒1960", pp. 115‒135. https://doi.org/10.1086/591871. Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/591871.
  • Kokowski, Michał 1996: Copernicus and the Hypothetico-Deductive Method of Correspondence Thinking. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum 5, pp. 7‒101. DOI: 10.12775/ths.1996.002.
  • Kokowski, Michał 2001: Thomas S. Kuhn (1922–1996) a zagadnienie rewolucji kopernikowskiej [Thomas S. Kuhn (1922–1996) and the issue of the Copernican revolution]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa IHN PAN. ISBN 83-86062-02-9; pp. 397. Available online: https://kpbc.umk.pl/dlibra/doccontent?id=41760.
  • Kokowski, Michał 2004: Copernicus's Originality: Towards Integration of Contemporary Copernican Studies. Warsaw – Cracow: Instytut Historii Nauki PAN. ISBN 83-86062-27-4 (Paper); pp. XIV + 314, ilus., tabl., bibls., apps., indexes.
  • Kokowski, Michał 2015a: A sketch on the current debate on scientometrics and bibliometrics versus the forgotten science of science (in Polish). Prace Komisji Historii Nauki PAU XIV (2015), ss. 101–118. URL: http://pau.krakow.pl/PKHN-PAU/pkhn-pau-XIV-2015-7.pdf.
  • Kokowski, Michał 2015a: A sketch on the current debate on scientometrics and bibliometrics versus the forgotten science of science (in Polish). Prace Komisji Historii Nauki PAU XIV (2015), ss. 101–118. URL: http://pau.krakow.pl/PKHN-PAU/pkhn-pau-XIV-2015-7.pdf.
  • Kokowski, Michał 2015b: What kind of scientometrics and bibliometrics do we need in Poland? (in Polish). Prace Komisji Historii Nauki PAU XIV (2015), ss. 119–168. URL: http://pau.krakow.pl/PKHN-PAU/pkhn-pau-XIV-2015-8.pdf.
  • Kokowski, Michał 2015c: Scientometric, bibliometric and informetric bibliography (Selection). Prace Komisji Historii Nauki PAU XIV (2015), ss. 169–204. URL: http://pau.krakow.pl/PKHN-PAU/pkhn-pau-XIV-2015-9.pdf.
  • Kokowski, Michał 2015d: The science of science (naukoznawstwo) in Poland: the changing theoretical perspectives and political contexts ‒ a historical sketch from the 1910s to 1993. Organon 47, pp. 147–237. Available online: https://home.cyf-kr.edu.pl/~n1kokows/Kokowski-Organon-2015.pdf.
  • Kokowski, Michał 2016: The Science of Science (naukoznawstwo) in Poland: Defending and Removing the Past in the Cold War. [In:] Science Studies during the Cold War and Beyond. Paradigms Defected. Edited by Elena Aronova, Simone Turchetti. Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. "Palgrave Studies in the History of Science and Technology", pp. 149–176. DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-55943-2_7. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308604190_The_Science_of_Science_naukoznawstwo_in_Poland_Defending_and_Removing_the_Past_in_the_Cold_War/link/5e5e17ee92851cefa1d6c9dc/download.
  • Kokowski, Michał 2019: Dwudziestolecie Komisji Historii Nauki PAU [20th anniversary of the PAU Commission on the History of Science] (presentation). Komisja Historii Nauki PAU, 23.10.2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4444847.
  • Kokowski, Michał 2021a: The turning points in the history of science of science and their current importance… 26th International Congress of History of Science and Technology. "Giants and Dwarfs in Science, Technology and Medicine". Prague, July 25‒31, 2021; https://www.ichst2021.org (presentation).
  • Kokowski, Michał 2021b: Boris Hessen and a paradoxical history of the historiography of science. A commentary on Hessen's famous paper delivered at the Second International Congress on the History of Science and Technology in London in 1931. 36th S.A. Kugel International School for Sociology of Science and Technology "Social Studies of Science: History and the Present" (to the 90th anniversary of the participation of the Soviet delegation in the Second International Congress of the History of Science in London), Sant Petersburg, December 2–3, 2021.
  • Kolchinsky, Eduard 2010: Liberalising international cooperation in the history and sociology of sciennce in Leningrad / St. Petersburg. [In:] Liberalizing Research in Science and Technology: Studies in Science Policy Edited by Nadia Asheulova, Binay Kumar Pattnaik, Eduard Kolchinsky, Gregory Sandstrom. St. Persburg: Politechnika, pp. 31-46. URL: http://ihst.nw.ru/Files/User/Asheulova/Liberalizing%20Research%20in%20Sciences%20and%20Technology.pdf.
  • Kol'man, Arnosht 1982: My ne dolzhny byli tak zhit. New York: Chalidze Publications, pp. 172‒177.
  • Kotarbiński, Tadeusz 1929 (1961, 1986): Elementy teorji poznania, logiki formalnej i metodologji nauk. Lwów: Zakład im. Ossolińskich; 2nd ed. 1961 (Wrocław: Zakład im. Ossolińskich); 3rd ed. 1986 (Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe).
  • Koyré, A. 1948: Les philosophes et la machine. Review of P.-M. Schuhl, Machinisme et philosophie (2nd ed.). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1946. Critique 4, pp. 324–333, 610–629.
  • Koyré, A. 1950: The significance of the Newtonian synthesis [paper presented at the University of Chicago, 3 November 1948]. Archives Internationales d'Histoire des Sciences 29, pp. 291–311; The Journal of General Education 4(4), pp.256-268. DOI: 10.2307/27795317. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27795317.
  • Kuhn, Thomas S. 1968/1977a: The History of Science. International Encyclopedia for Social Sciences vol. 14 (New York: Crowell Crollier and Macmillian, 1968), pp. 74‒83 / Reprinted in 1977: Thomas S. Kuhn, The Essential Tensions. Selected Studies in Scientific Traditions (Chicago and London: Chicago University Press), chap. 5, pp. 105‒126.
  • Kuhn, Thomas S. 1976/1977b: Mathematical versus Experimental Traditions in the Development of Physical Sciences. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 7, pp. 1‒31 / Reprinted in 1977: Thomas S. Kuhn, The Essential Tensions. Selected Studies in Scientific Traditions (Chicago and London: Chicago University Press), chap. 3, pp. 31‒65.
  • Kuhn, Thomas S. 1983: Reflections on Receiving the John Desmond Bernal Award. 4S Review 1(4), pp. 26-30. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/690305.
  • Lakatos, Imre 1970: History of Science and its Rational Reconstructions. Philosophy of Science Association (PSA) 1970, pp 91-136. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-3142-4_7.
  • Lenin, Vladimir Ilich 1909: Materialism and Empirio-Criticism. Critical Comments on a Reactionary Philosophy. Moskva: Zveno Publishers. URL: https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1908/mec/.
  • Lenin, Vladimir Ilich 1918: The Immediate Task of the Soviet power. April 28, 1918 in Pravda No. 83 and Izvestia VTsIK No.85. URL: https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1918/mar/x03.htm.
  • Laudan, L. (1970). Comment. In R. H. Stuewer (Ed.), Historical and philosophical perspectives of science (pp. 127–132). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Mackay, Alan L 2007: J D Bernal: his legacy to science and to society. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 57, pp. 1–16. URL: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/57/1/001/pdf.
  • Mayer, Anna K. 2002: Fatal Mutilations: educationism and the British Background to the 1931 International Congress for the History of Science and Technology. History of Science 40, pp. 445–472. DOI: 10.1177/007327530204000404.
  • Mayer, Anna K. 2004: Setting up a Discipline, II: British History of Science and the End of Ideology, 1931–1948. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 35(1), pp. 1–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2003.12.010.
  • Mendelsohn, E. (1999). Science at a crossroads: Defining and prescribing an uncertain future. Paper presented in the session on 'The history of the discipline, c. 1930–1950', at the 75th Annual Meeting of the History of Science Society in Pittsburgh, 3–7 November.
  • Merton, Robert K. 1938 (2nd ed.1970): Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth-Century England. Osiris, pp. 362‒632. 2nd ed. 1970: New York: Harper and Row.
  • Merton, Robert K. 1939: Science and the Economy of Seventeenth-Century England. Science and Society 3, pp. 3–27. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40399194. pp. 3-4 critique of Clark 1937a / 1937b.
  • Mikulinsky, S. R., La science de la science: problèmes et recherches des années 1970 ", in Salomon, J.-J. and Spiegel-Rösing, I. (eds.), Science Policy Studies (Tokyo: International Commission for Science Policy Studies, 1974), pp. 186-200.
  • Микулинский, С. и другие (ред.) 1985: Основы науковедения. Moсква: Наука.
  • Микулинский, С.Р.; Родный, Н.И. 1966: Nauka Kak Predmet Spetsial'nogo Issledovaniya / Наука Как Предмет Специального Исследования. Вопросы Философии 5, pp. 25‒38.
  • Mirsky, E. M. 1972: Science Studies in the USSR (History, Problems, Prospects). Science Studies 2(3), pp. 281‒294. Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/284519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277200200304. Reproduced from Voprosy Istorii Estestvoznaniya i Tekhniki (Problems of the History of Science and Technology) 3‒4, 1971, pp. 86‒97).
  • Мирский, Э.М. 2018: НАУКОВЕДЕНИЕ. Электронная библиотека ИФ РАН » Новая философская энциклопедия. URL: https://iphlib.ru/greenstone3/library/collection/newphilenc/page/about.
  • Mulkay, Michael 1979: Science and the Sociology of Knowledge. "Routledge Library Editions: Social Theory" vol. 60. London, New York: Routledge.
  • Nauka Polska. Jej Potrzeby, Organizacja i Rozwój 1918-1947.
  • Needham, Joseph 1934: A history of embryology. Cambridge: The University Press. https://books.google.pl/books?redir_esc=y&hl=pl&id=Fsg5AAAAIAAJ
  • Needham, Joseph 1938: Capitalism and Science (review of Clark's Science and Social Welfare). Economic History Review 8, 198–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2590831. Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2590831.
  • Needham, Joseph 2004: Science & Civilisation in China, vol. VII: PART II: General Conclusions and Reflections. K. G. Robinson (ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  • Ogurcov, A.P. 2009a/2021a: Naukovedenie. [In:] Ènciklopedija èpistemologii i filosofii nauki. Kasavin I.T. (main ed.) «Kanon +» ROOI «Reabilitacija». ISBN: 978-5-88373-089-3. Available online: https://gufo.me/dict/epistemology_encyclopedia/науковедение or in: Nacional'naja Filosofskaja Ènciklopedija β, https://terme.ru/termin/naukovedenie.html.
  • Ogurcov, A.P. 2009b/2021b: Naukovedenie kak točnaja nauka. [In:] Ènciklopedija èpistemologii i filosofii nauki. Kasavin I.T. (chief ed.) «Kanon +» ROOI «Reabilitacija». ISBN: 978-5-88373-089-3. Available online: https://gufo.me/dict/epistemology_encyclopedia/_Науковедение_как_точная_наука or in: Nacional'naja Filosofskaja Ènciklopedija β, https://terme.ru/termin/naukovedenie-kak-tochnaja-nauka.html.
  • Ossowska, Maria; Ossowski, Stanisław 1935/1936, 1964, 1982: Nauka o nauce [The Science of Science]. Nauka Polska. Jej Potrzeby, Organizacja i Rozwój 20, pp. 1–12. Engl. transl. The Science of Science. Organon 1, 1936, pp. 1–12, reprinted in: Minerva 3, 1/1964, pp. 72–82 & Walentynowicz (ed.) 1982, pp. 82–95.
  • Петров, Михаил Константинович 1967: Философские проблемы «науки о науке». Автореф. дисс… канд. филос. наук. – Ростов-на-Дону. – 24 с.
  • Петров, Михаил Константинович 2006: Философские проблемы «науки о науке». Предмет социологии науки. "Филосoфы Росии XX века". Москва: Российская политическая энциклопедия (РОССПЭН).
  • Porter, R. (1990). The history of science and the history of society. In R. C. Olby, G. N. Cantor, J. R. R. Christie, & M. J. S. Hodge (Eds.), Companion to the history of modern science (pp. 32–46). London, New York: Routledge.
  • Rabkin, Yakov 1976: Naukovedenie: The Study of Scientific Research in the Soviet Union. Minerva 14(1), pp. 61-78. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41820265.
  • Rabkin, Yakov 1977: Science Studies as an Area of Scientific Exchange. [In:] J. R. Thomas and U. Kruse-Vaucienne (eds.), Soviet Science and Technology: Domestic and Foreign Perspectives (Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation, 1977), pp. 69-82.
  • Rée, J. 1984: Dialectical materialism and the scientists. In idem, Proletarian philosophers: Problems in socialist culture in Britain, 1900–1940 (pp. 79–105). Oxford: Clarendon Press
  • Rose, Hilary; Rose, Steven (eds.)1976: The Radicalisation of Science. Ideology of/in the Natural Sciences. MacMillan Press LTD.
  • Rose, Hilary; Rose, Steven 1976: The Radicalisation of Science. [In:] Rose, Hilary; Rose, Steven (eds.)1976, pp. 1‒31.
  • Rubinsteyn, Modest 1931: O poyezdke na Mezhdunarodnyy Kongress v London po Istorii Nauki i Tekhniki. Vestnik Kommunisticheskoy Akademii 8‒9 (Avgust ‒ Sentyabr'), pp. 93‒100. Available online: https://www.mediafire.com/?bju0byylrpxycsk.
  • Schaffer, Simon 1984: Newton at the Crossroads. Radical Philosophy 37, pp. 23–28. URL: https://www.radicalphilosophyarchive.com/issue-files/rp37_article3_schaffer_newton.pdf.
  • Shapin, Steven 1980: A Course in the Social History of Science. Social Studies of Science 10(2), May, 1980, pp. 231-258. DOI: 10.2307/284566. Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/284566.
  • Shapin, Steven 1982: Hessen thesis. Dictionary of the History of Science (ed. by W. F. Bynum) London: Macmillan, pp. 185‒186.
  • Skalska-Zlat, Marta 2001: Nalimov and the Polish way towards science of science. Scientometrics 52 (2), pp. 211–223. DOI:10.1023/A:1017911722525.
  • Struik, Dirk 2008: Further Thoughts on Merton in Context. Science in Context 3(1), Spring 1989, pp. 227‒238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889700000788.
  • Talbot, Chris; Pattison, Olga (eds., translators) 2021: Boris Hessen: Physics and Philosophy in the Soviet Union, 1927–1931: Neglected Debates on Emergence and Reduction. Edited and translated by Chris Talbot, Olga Pattison. Springer Nature.
  • Thackray, A. 1970: Science: Has its present past a future? In R. H. Stuewer (Ed.), Historical and philosophical perspectives of science (pp. 112–127, 132–133). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Thomas, Paul 1976: Marx and science. Political Studies XXIV(1), pp. 1‒23.
  • Thomas, Paul 2008: Marxism & Scientific Socialism: From Engels to Althusser. Routledge.
  • Toulmin, Stephen 1977: From Form to Function: Philosophy and History of Science in the 1950s and Now. Daedalus 106(3) "Discoveries and Interpretations: Studies in Contemporary Scholarship", vol. I (Summer, 1977), pp. 143-162. DOI: 10.2307/20024498. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20024498.
  • Tyrowicz, Marjan 1933: Science at the Cross Roads. Papers presented to the International Congress of the History of Science and Technology held in London from June 29th to July 3rd, l931, by the Delegates of the U. S. S. R. — Kniga (England) Ltd. Bush House. Aldwych, London. W . C. 2. 1931. S. 4nlb. + 23 +4 + 24 + 12 + 12 + 10 (mapa) + 4 + 31 + 62 + 15 + 3. Nauka Polska. Jej Potrzeby, Organizacja i Rozwój XVII, pp. ss. 330-337.
  • Vucinich, Alexander 1982: Soviet Marxism and the History of Science. Russian Review 41(2), pp. 123‒143. DOI: 10.2307/129668.
  • Walentynowicz, Bohdan (ed.) 1982: Polish Contributions to the Science of Science. Warsaw – Boston: PWN–Polish Scientific Publishers – D. Reidel Publ. Comp.
  • Wersky, P. Gary 1971a: Introduction. On the Reception of Science at the Cross Roads in England. [In:] Hessen, Grossmann 2009, pp. xi‒xxix.
  • Werskey, Paul Gary 1971b: British Scientists and 'Outsider' Politics, 1931‒1945. Science Studies 1(1), pp. 67–83. DOI: 10.2307/370197. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/370197.
  • Werskey, Gary 1978a: The Visible College. The Collective Biography of British Scientific Socialists in the 1930s. London: Allen Lane; New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 2nd ed. London: Free Association Books, 1988.
  • Werskey, Gary 1978b: The Visible College revisited: second opinions on the Red scientists of the 1930s'. Minerva 45(3), pp. 305–319.
  • Werskey, Gary 2007: The Marxist Critique of Capitalist Science: A History in Three Movements? Science as Culture 16(4), pp. 397–461.
  • Znaniecki, Florian 1925: Przedmiot i zadania nauki o wiedzy [The subject and tasks of the science of knowledge]. Nauka Polska. Jej Potrzeby, Organizacja i Rozwój 5, pp. 1–78. Reprinted in: Znaniecki 1984, pp. 1–109; 1987, pp. 297–400. Engl. transl.: The Subject Matter and Tasks of the Science of Knowledge, transl. by C. Kasparek in: Walentynowicz (ed.) 1982, pp. 1–81].
  • Znaniecki, Florian 1984: Społeczne role uczonych. Edited by Jerzy Szacki. Warszawa: PWN