Published June 28, 2022 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Pichipilus undetermined

  • 1. School of Science, Engineering and Environment University of Salford, U. K. & School of Biological, Earth & Environmental Sciences University of New South Wales, Australia & Division of Vertebrate Zoology (Mammalogy) American Museum of Natural History
  • 2. Division of Vertebrate Zoology (Mammalogy) American Museum of Natural History
  • 3. Bell Museum and Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior University of Minnesota

Description

Pichipilus

SPECIES SCORED: † Pichipilus osborni (type species), † P. centinelus, † P. riggsi.

GEOLOGICAL PROVENANCE OF SCORED SPECIMENS: Santa Cruz Formation, Santa Cruz Province, Argentina († Pichipilus osborni and † P. centinelus); Sarmiento Formation, Colué-Huapí Member, Gran Barranca, Chubut Province, Argentina († P. riggsi).

AGE OF SCORED SPECIMENS: Examined specimens of † Pichipilus osborni and † P. centinelus are from “Notohippidian” (“Notohippidense”) sites in the Santa Cruz Formation, which appear to represent the early part of the Santacrucian SALMA (about14–19 Mya; see † Stilotherium, above). By contrast, the Colué-Huapí fauna of the Sarmiento Formation, the type fauna of the Colhuehuapian SALMA and source of our material of † P. riggsi, is estimated to span the interval from 20.0 to 20.4 Mya (i.e., early Miocene) based on radiometric and magnetostratigraphic evidence (Ré et al., 2010).

ASSIGNED AGE RANGE: 20.400 –14.000 Mya.

REMARKS: The holotype and only known specimen of † Pichipilus centinelus, a partial cranium and associated partial left mandible (MLP- 68-I-17-204) described by Marshall and Pascual (1977; see also Goin et al., 2003, 2007b), is one of only a handful of fossil paucituberculatan skulls currently known. Conflicting opinions have been expressed as to whether this specimen preserves evidence of an anteorbital vacuity between the nasal, frontal, and maxillary bones, a distinctive cranial feature that is unique to caenolestids among extant marsupials (Thomas, 1895; Osgood, 1921, 1924; Bublitz, 1987; Patterson and Gallardo, 1987; Goin et al., 2003, 2007; Abello, 2007). Most of our character data for † Pichipilus is based on MLP-68-I-17-204. However, we also used specimens of † P. osborni (known only from the holotype, a partial mandible) and † P. riggsi for scoring dental characters (see Abello, 2007). † Pichipilus was referred by Goin et al. (2009a) to the family † Pichipilidae, which falls within the larger clade Palaeothentoidea in recent large-scale phylogenetic analyses of Paucituberculata (Abello, 2013; Rincón et al., 2015; Engelman et al., 2016; Abello et al., 2020).

Notes

Published as part of Beck, Robin M. D., Voss, Robert S. & Jansa, Sharon A., 2022, Craniodental Morphology And Phylogeny Of Marsupials, pp. 1-353 in Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 2022 (457) on page 320, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0090.457.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/6971356

Files

Files (2.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:e9cf75f3b25404df2927f9a8f9a41f36
2.7 kB Download

System files (12.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:ae927a88a7b26ede85474d7dec008a33
12.0 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
Chordata
Order
Paucituberculata
Family
Caenolestidae
Genus
Pichipilus
Species
undetermined
Taxon rank
species