Published July 25, 2022 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Hyperlasion breviantenna Sueyoshi & Nakamura & Menzel 2022, sp. n.

  • 1. Center for Biodiversity and Climate Change, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, 1 Matsunosato, Tsukuba, 305 - 8687 Japan. msuey @ ffpri. affrc. go. jp; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0003 - 2782 - 9401
  • 2. Tama Forest Science Garden, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Todorimachi 1833 - 81, Hachioji, Tokyo, 193 - 0843 Japan. nakamuras 1220 @ affrc. go. jp; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0002 - 9424 - 8773
  • 3. Senckenberg Deutsches Entomologisches Institut (SDEI), Section Diptera, Eberswalder Strasse 90, Müncheberg, 15374 Germany. frank. menzel @ senckenberg. de; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 9662 - 6291

Description

Hyperlasion breviantenna sp. n.

Figs 1 a–f, 2 a–c, 3 a–c

Literature. Epidapus sp. — Tagami (2011): 87; Tagami (2014): 20.

Description. Male. Body (Fig. 1a) entirely brown in ground color; all setae concolorous with body sclerites. Body length = 1.3–1.5 mm (n = 5). Head. 3 ocelli present; eye bridge 2 facets wide except 1 facet at middle. Antennae moderately long; scape and pedicel short, roundish and brown (not extended); 4th flagellomere (Fig. 1c) 2.0 times as long as wide; basal portion uniform brown, neck paler and hyaline, 1/3 times as long as basal portion of flagellomere; basal portion 1.5 times as long as wide, with coarse setae as long as width of basal part and some long, close-fitting sensilla. Maxillary palpus (Fig. 2a) one-segmented with 2–4 ventral setae in equal length; dorsoapically with single large sensory pit and numerous sensilla. Thorax. Pronotum with 4 setae laterally; proepisternum with 5 setae; 2 postpronotal setae present; scutum with 5 presutural and postsutural dorsocentral setae, presutural acrostichal setae; scutellum slightly produced apically, with 6–8 scutellar setae (2 longer setae dorsally and with 2–3 short lateral setae on each side); mediotergite shorter than scutum; katepisternum not extended longitudinally, higher than long. Wing (Fig. 1d). Entirely hyaline and slightly tinged with pale brown, 2.6 times as long as wide; posterior wing veins and wing membrane bare; R, R 1 and R 5 only with dorsal macrotrichia; R 1 short, merging with C well before base of M-fork; R 1 = 0.75–0.85 R; stem of M longer than M-fork; M-fork 2.5 times as long as wide; r-m crossvein (y) and stem of M (x) bare; x as long as y; CuA-stem = 1/3 to 1/2 x; c = 0.7 w. Wing length = 1.3–1.4 mm (n = 4). Halter short; stem pale brown, knob brown. Legs. Short and robust, without spines and processes; fore femur thickened, 4 times as long as wide at widest point; fore tibiae shorter than fore tarsus, thickened toward apex, 7.5 times as long as wide at widest point; tibial spurs 1+2+2, short and relatively fine, shorter than diameter of tibiae, in equal length. Claws straight, without teeth. Genitalia (Fig. 2b). About as high as wide; gonocoxite short and strong; ventral base of gonocoxite without appendages and processes (without basal lobe or baso-medial groups of setae); tergite X very short and wide, trapezoidal, with 2 rows of coarse setae; tegmen (Figs 2b: t, 3b) as long as wide, round laterally, with small basal constriction, truncate at apex, without distinct aedeagal teeth; aedeagus (Fig. 3b) extremely short, only recognizable as a small drop-shaped structure; gonostylus (Figs 2b: gs, 3a) about 6/5 times as long as wide, slightly shorter than gonocoxite; apex of gonostylus equally rounded, wider than basal part, covered with short setae, without apical tooth, with 5 megasetae at apical portion; hyaline megasetae hardly distinguishable from other setae on apical portion of gonostylus.

Female. Similar to male but different in the following points. Body (Fig. 1b). Entirely brown in ground color. Body length: 1.4–1.8 mm (n = 9). Head. Eye bridge with 2 facets wide, 1 facet at middle. Antennae with globular pedicel and 14 flagellomeres; 4th flagellomere (Fig. 1e) as long as wide, neck 1/2 times as long as basal portion; basal portion with more sensilla longer and more strongly curved. Maxillary palpus with 4 or 5 long setae ventrally.

Thorax. Pronotum with 4–5 setae laterally; scutellum reduced as flat sclerite posterior to scutum, apex not produced posteriorly, with long lateral and short apical scutellar setae and adjacent setae around lateral seta; mediotergite enlarged, longer than scutellum, shorter than scutum; proepisternum with more than 10 setae. Wing (Fig. 1f). 3.0 times as long as wide; R 1 shorter, = 0.5–0.8 R; c = 0.8 w. Wing length: 1.0– 1.5 mm (n = 13). Legs. Fore tibia 8 times as long as wide at widest point; fore femur 4 times as long as wide. Postabdomen (Fig. 2c). S8 divided into longitudinal 2 sclerites; apical segment of cercus (Fig. 2c: c) slightly shorter than basal segment.

Etymology. The name ‘ breviantenna ’ is Latin (brevis = short; antenna = antenna). This specific epithet is a noun in apposition that refers to the short female antenna of this species.

Specimens examined. Type material. Holotype: ♂, JAPAN, “Ichinokura, Tajimi City, Gifu Prefecture, Japan, 1.vii.2021, M. Sueyoshi leg.” (Hb. 0060 in BLKU). Paratypes: JAPAN. Shizuoka Prefecture: 10♀, Ohya, Shizuoka City, 23–30.vi.2016, Y. Tagami leg., collected by yellow pan traps (Hb. 0023– Hb. 0034). Gifu Prefecture: 12♀, Ichinokura, Tajimi City, 16.vii.2020, Y. Tagami leg. (Hb. 0045– Hb. 0056); 2♂, same data as holotype (Hb.0061, Hb. 0062); 1♂, same date and locality as holotype, Y.Tagami leg. (Hb. 0059); 15♀, Kasahara, Tajimi City, 17.vii.2020, anonymous collectors (Hb. 0001– Hb. 0015); 3♀, Asahigaoka, Tajimi City, 17.vii.2020, anonymous collectors (Hb. 0020– Hb. 0022); 1♂ 1♀, Nisizaka, Tajimi City, 18.vii.2020, anonymous collectors (Hb. 0016, Hb. 0017). 1♂ 11♀, Fukuoka Prefecture: Dazaifu City, 10.vi.2016, K. Kawagoe leg. (Hb. 0033– Hb. 0044).

Other specimens (non-type series). JAPAN (all preserved in ethanol and preserved in FFPRI): Gifu Prefecture: 869♀, Kasahara, Tajimi City, 17.vii.2020, anonymous collectors; 32♀, Shiominomori, Tajimi City, 25.vi.2021, Y. Tagami leg.; 996♀, same locality and date, M. Sueyoshi leg.; 23♀, Higashiyama, Tajimi City, 1.vii.2021, M. Sueyoshi leg.; 48♀, Sannokura, Tajimi City, 1.vii.2021, M. Sueyoshi leg. AUSTRALIA (BIN BOLD: ACQ9549; all data taken from BOLD). New South Wales: 2♀, Glendale Road, Berowra, Brooklyn [= Glendale Road, NE of Berowra, N of Sydney], - 33.5990°N, 151.1640°E, 205m, Malaise trap, 27.xii.2012, P. Hebert leg. (BIOUG15885 - H03, BIOUG15886 -G04). 2♀, Hat Head [= Hat Head, S of South West Rocks, S of Coffs Harbour], - 31.0626°N, 153.0520°E, 36m, 18.ii.2012, P. Hebert leg. (BIOUG37606 -A05, BIOUG37606 -F02).

Specimens used for molecular analysis (not preserved as physical vouchers). JAPAN. Gifu Prefecture: 6♀, Kasahara, Tajimi City, 17.vii.2020, anonymous collectors (Hyperlasion-breviantenna _female_JPN-Gifu_ 0607 T10, Hyperlasion-breviantenna _female_JPN-Gifu_ T1 to Hyperlasion-breviantenna _female_JPN-Gifu_ T6); 1♂, Ichinokura, Tajimi City, 1.vii.2021, Y. Tagami leg. (Hyperlasion-breviantenna _male_JPN- Gifu _202107); 1♀, Ohya, Shizuoka City, 23–30.vi.2016, Y. Tagami leg., collected by pan traps (Hyperlasion-breviantenna _female_ JPN-Shizuoka_S4).

Distribution. Japan (Honshu, Kyushu). Australia (New South Wales).

Remarks. Hyperlasion is characterized in Menzel & Mohrig (2000) by the following morphological characters: maxillary palpus one-segmented, with sensory pit apically; wing vein R 1 shorter than R, merging with the costal vein C before base of M-fork (Fig. 1d); anal area of wing reduced (Fig. 1d); halter with short stem; apex of fore tibia undifferentiated, without distinct group of setae; apex of gonostylus rounded, toothless and with mesal megasetae only at the inner side of the gonostylus (Figs 2b, 3a). Our new species is distinguished from other Hyperlasion congeners by the very short female antenna (Fig. 1b) with flagellomeres as long as wide (Fig. 1e), the gonostylus with more than four (mostly 6 to 7) mesal megasetae (Fig. 3a), and a membranous, almost quadrangular tegmen longer than wide (Fig. 3b), similar to H. wasmanni. Hyperlasion breviantenna sp. n. differs from this species by the much shorter female flagellomeres, the thickened maxillary palpus with a larger sensory pit in both sexes, slightly longer gonostyli with an evenly rounded apex, much weaker mesal gonostylar megasetae, and an extremely short aedeagus (Fig. 3b).

Sexual dimorphism (except for the genitalia) of this species is observed in: male antennal flagellomeres longer than those of female; and fore tibia of male thicker than that of female. Other morphological differences between males and females are not observed in wing shape, height/length of the katepisternum, and leg length such as reported in H. aliens (Menzel & Smith 2009) and H. viridiventris (Menzel et al. 2013).

Tagami (2011, 2014) gave it the Japanese name “Shizuoka-kohige-kurobane-kinokobae”. We assume that it includes most of black fungus gnats which have been called locally as Japanese “kobae” [= gnats] (Tajimi City 2020), “tajimimushi” [= gnats of Tajimi City], and “kurobane-kinokobae” [= sciarids] (Goto 2014) in Tajimi City.

Taxonomy based on genetic analysis. A ML tree rooted with Diadocidia ferruginea as an outgroup of sciarids is shown in Fig. 4. It supported the monophyly of the Hyperlasion species examined here. It further indicates that the Japanese and Australian specimens are clustered as in a one monophyletic group with less than 1% differences in the examined nucleotide sequences, and it was distinctly different from other congeners examined. Thus, we can expect that these specimens are from a distinct species of Hyperlasion, which we refer to here as H. breviantenna. The Australian females are conspecific with Japanese specimens due to the small genetic distance of less than 1 % to the Japanese specimens (Fig. 4). Australian records lack any male specimens. No males are known from Australia so far.

......continued on the next page

TABLE 1. (Continued)

......continued on the next page

TABLE 1. (Continued)

Biology of Hyperlasion breviantenna in Japan

This species has been reported as a nuisance pest, after vast number of adults infested in urban areas of Tajimi City, Gifu Prefecture, Japan (Goto 2014) and Shizuoka City, Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan (Tagami 2014). In urban areas, the flies enter houses through gaps between closed windows. The adults emerge early in the morning on sunny days during the rainy season, i.e. June to July (Tagami 2011, 2014). More than 100 individuals enter rooms per half hour, peaking at around 09:00–10:00 and declining at noon (Tagami 2011, 2014). Tagami (2011) reported that most of the flies invading houses were females. After entering the buildings, they soon die (Fig. 3a). The adults which were mentioned in the literature were found at the forest edge (Tagami 2014), on humus (Goto 2014) and mown grass (Tajimi City 2020) in Japan.

The plagues of H. breviantenna in Japan are obviously female-biased. The specimens collected at three localities in Tajimi City on 1 July 2021, include just three males but more than a thousand females simultaneously. We found two previous reports on sciarid mass occurrence in the literature. Pritchard (1960) reported that thousands of females of Moehnia erema occurred in the Entomological Laboratory of the University of California, USA, during three days in August. Heller et al. (2009) reported 2618 females of H. wasmanni with malaise traps in three weeks during July and August, 2004, in Sweden. Nielsen et al. (2016) reviewed published collection data of H. wasmanni and noted that the occurrence of the species is skewed towards female. Steffan (1981) stated that M. erema is parthenogenetic, with few male occurrences. We found a small number of males in the field. This implies that H. breviantenna must not parthenogenetic, but we have no data to substantiate this at the present time.

Hyperlasion breviantenna is assumed to inhabit forests and forest edges (Tagami 2014; Goto 2014) and further details are unknown at present time. Only of the most common Hyperlasion, the widespread type species H. wasmanni Schmitz, are the ecology and lifestyle better studied, including habitats. Hyperlasion wasmanni is common in various vegetation: woodlands, heathland, sedge beds, raised bogs, and damp meadows (e.g., Menzel et al. 2006). Schmitz (1918) and de Meijere (1928) reported that H. wasmanni was collected from nests of ants: Lasius fuliginosus (Latreille), L. niger (Linnaeus), and Formica exsecta Nylander (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in the Netherlands. Heller et al. (2009) and Nielsen et al. (2016) referred to it as myrmecophilous. Steffan (1974) reported that larvae of H. wasmanni (as a junior synonym, H. magnisensoria Hardy, 1956, in the text) were found on fallen Coprosoma logs covered with moss, and that they fed off the surface of the wood under the thick mat of moss. Extensive studies to microhabitats in which the development cycle of H. breviantenna takes place and the host plants of or the fungi associated with H. breviantenna larvae still need to be carried out. Further researches focusing on any ants and mosses when seeking habitats and biological interactions of H. breviantenna to other organisms might help in the development of control measures for this new pest insect.

H y perlasion breviantenna may have genetically closed populations outside of Japan and Australia. Ten sciarid species are known as cosmopolitan pests in agriculture (Broadley et al. 2018). Sciarids are easily transported with plants and soil. We suspect that one or both populations may have been introduced via cultivated plants and have become established in Japan and/or Australia. Some literature reports natural dispersal with long distances between the mainland and oceanic islands or between them have been reported (Holzapfel & Harrell 1968; Hardy & Cheng 1986; Peck 1994). We need sufficient evidence on natural and artificial events associated with dispersal of Hyperlasion breviantenna.

Notes

Published as part of Sueyoshi, Masahiro, Nakamura, Shoko & Menzel, Frank, 2022, A new species of Hyperlasion Schmitz (Diptera: Sciaridae), causing periodic outbreaks in Japan, pp. 451-463 in Zootaxa 5168 (4) on pages 453-461, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5168.4.5, http://zenodo.org/record/6899796

Files

Files (14.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:46d5da403af727ffb3dfe57161d55d7a
14.7 kB Download

System files (136.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:10b2c714ef748df62b79326be29580fd
136.6 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

References

  • Tagami, Y. (2011) Biology of Epidapus sp. In: Sato, T. & Matsui, H. (Eds.), Environmental Report 2011, Shizuoka University. Shizuoka University, Shizuoka, pp. 87. [in Japanese]
  • Tagami, Y. (2014) A report on plague of Epidapus sp. Pest Control, Tokyo, 165, 19 - 21. [in Japanese]
  • Menzel, F. & Mohrig, W. (2000) Revision der palaarktischen Trauermucken (Diptera: Sciaridae). Studia dipterologica Supplement, 6, 1 - 761. [1999]
  • Menzel, F. & Smith, J. E. (2009) Family Sciaridae In: Gerlach, J. (Ed.), The Diptera of the Seychelles Islands. Pensoft Series Faunistica, 85, 19 - 45.
  • Menzel, F., Vilkamaa, P. & Smith, J. (2013) Overview of the black fungus gnats from the Tristan da Cunha archipelago, including a redescription of Hyperlasion viridiventris (Frey) (Diptera, Sciaroidea: Sciaridae). Contributions to Entomology, 63, 283 - 296. https: // doi. org / 10.21248 / contrib. entomol. 63.2.283 - 296
  • Tajimi City (2020) Control measure for gnats. non-paginated website, last modified on 9 July 2020. Available from: https: // www. city. tajimi. lg. jp / kurashi / kankyo / kankyohozen / kobae. html (accessed 15 July 2020) [in Japanese]
  • Goto, K. (2014) Current status and survey on black fungus gnats in Gifu Prefecture. Pest Control, Tokyo, 165, 22 - 26. [in Japanese]
  • Nei, M. & Kumar, S. (2000) Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, 352 pp.
  • Meigen, J. W. (1830) Systematische Beschreibung der bekannten europaischen zweiflugeligen Insekten. Sechster Theil. Schulzische Buchhandlung, Hamm, iv + 401 pp., pls. 55 - 66.
  • Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. (2018) MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Molecular Biolology and Evolution, 35, 1547 - 1549. https: // doi. org / 10.1093 / molbev / msy 096.
  • Vilkamaa, P. & Menzel, F. (2019) Re-classification of Lycoriella Frey sensu lato (Diptera, Sciaridae), with description of Trichocoelina gen. n. and twenty new species. Zootaxa, 4665 (1), 1 - 67. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4665.1.1
  • Johannsen, O. A. (1912) The fungus gnats of North America, Part IV (conclusion). Bulletin of the Maine Agricultural Experimental Station, 200, 57 - 146.
  • De Geer, C. (1778) Memoires pour servir a l'histoire des insectes. Tome septieme. Imprimerie de Pierre Hesselberg, Stockholm, xii + 950 pp., 49 pls.
  • Shin, S., Jung, S., Menzel, F., Heller, K., Lee, H. & Lee. S. (2013) Molecular phylogeny of black fungus gnats (Diptera: Sciaroidea: Sciaridae) and the evolution of larval habitats. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 66, 833 - 846. https: // doi. org / 10.1016 / j. ympev. 2012.11.008
  • Vimmer, A. (1926) Nove rody Lycoriid (s bezkridlymi samickami) z lesni pudy [Genres nouveaux des Lycoriides (avec des femelles apteres) du sol de forets]. Sbornik vysoke skoly zemedelske v Brne, CSR (Fakulta Lesnicka), D 3, 1 - 16.
  • Arthofer, W., Gollner, A., Heller, K., Steiner, F. M., Schlick-Steiner, B. C. & Seeber, J. (2021) Contribution to the molecular phylogeny of Sciaridae (Diptera) with special attention to the genera Bradysia and Corynoptera. Zootaxa, 4591 (2), 391 - 400. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4951.2.12
  • Mohrig, W., Roschmann. F. & Rulik, B. (2004) The fauna of sciarid flies from the Dominican Republic (Diptera, Sciaridae). Beitrage zur Entomologie, 54, 267 - 331. https: // doi. org / 10.21248 / contrib. entomol. 54.2.267 - 331
  • Pritchard, A. E. (1960) A new classification of the paedogenic gall midges formerly assigned to the subfamily Heteropezinae (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 53, 305 - 316. https: // doi. org / 10.1093 / aesa / 53.3.305
  • Hopkins, A. D. (1895) Notes on the habits of certain Mycetophilids, with descriptions of Epidapus scabiei, sp. nov. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 3, 149 - 159.
  • Heller, K., Vilkamaa, P. & Hippa, H. (2009) An annotated check list of Swedish black fungus gnats (Diptera, Sciaridae). Sahlbergia, 15, 23 - 51.
  • Nielsen, B. O., Nielsen, L. B. & Toft, S. (2016) Epigaeic Diptera Nematocera from the coastal sand dunes of National Park Thy, Denmark. Entomologiske Meddelelser, 84, 1 - 34.
  • Steffan, W. A. (1981) 15. Sciaridae. In: McAlpine, J. F., Peterson, B. V., Shewell, G. E., Teskey, H. J., Vockeroth, J. R. & Wood, D. M. (Eds.), Manual of Nearctic Diptera, Volume 1. Research Branch, Agriculture Canada Monograph, 27, 247 - 255.
  • Menzel, F., Smith, J. E. & Chandler, P. J. (2006) The sciarid fauna of the British Isles (Diptera: Sciaridae), including descriptions of six new species. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 146, 1 - 147. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1096 - 3642.2006.00190. x
  • Schmitz, H. (1918) Neue Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Sciariden mit reduzierten Maxillarpalpen. Tijdschrift voor Entomologie, 61, 88 - 111.
  • de Meijere, J. C. H. (1928) Vierde Supplement op de Nieuwe Naamlijst van Nederlandsche Diptera. Tijdschrift voor Entomologie, 71, 11 - 83.
  • Steffan, W. A. (1974) Laboratory studies and ecological notes on Hawaiian Sciaridae (Diptera). Pacific Insects, 16, 41 - 50.
  • Hardy, D. E. (1956) New Hawaiian Sciaridae (Diptera). Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society, 16, 72 - 90.
  • Broadley, A., Kauschke, E. & Mohrig, W. (2018) Black fungus gnats (Diptera: Sciaridae) found in association with cultivated plants and mushrooms in Australia, with notes on cosmopolitan pest species and biosecurity interceptions. Zootaxa, 4415 (2), 201 - 242. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4415.2.1
  • Holzapfel, E. P. & Harrell, J. C. (1968) Transoceanic dispersal studies of insects. Pacific Insects, 10, 115 - 153.
  • Hardy, A. C. & Cheng, L. (1986) Studies in the distribution of insects by aerial currents. III. Insect drift over the sea. Ecological Entomology, 11, 283 - 290.
  • Peck, S. B. (1994) Aerial dispersal of insects between and to islands in the Galapagos Archipelago, Ecuador. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 87, 218 - 224. https: // doi. org / 10.1093 / aesa / 87.2.218