Published July 21, 2022 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Bactrocera (Bactrocera) invadens Drew, Tsuruta and White

  • 1. Department of Entomology, Dr. Y. S. P. U. H. F. Nauni, Solan, Himachal Pradesh
  • 2. Department of Entomology, Dr. Y. S. P. U. H. F. Nauni, Solan, Himachal Pradesh & Sharmaisha 0590 @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0003 - 4713 - 6274
  • 3. 60 South Street, Carlisle, Cumbria CA 1 2 EP, United Kingdom
  • 4. Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur

Description

Bactrocera (Bactrocera) invadens Drew, Tsuruta and White

(Figure 5)

Bactrocera (Bactrocera) invadens Drew, Tsuruta and White, 2005: 149; Drew et al. 2007: 4.

Diagnosis (Male): A medium-sized species (6.55±0.15) with face fulvous or pale brown with two oval black spots in antennal furrows, two frontal setae and one orbital seta, ocellar triangle pale brown to dark, ocellus fuscous, outer vertical seta and medial vertical seta present and dark in colour, a thin row of black postocular setae present on occiput, occiput fuscous, gena fulvous with a seta but no dark subocular spot. Scape and pedicel fuscous, first flagellomere dark fuscous to dark brown. Scutum generally dark orange to red-brown with black lanceolate markings, dark brown to red in some specimens, the medial dark lanceolate marking variable in shape and in some specimens scutum entirely pale or mostly black. Postpronotal lobes and notopleura bright yellow. Postsutural lateral yellow vittae narrow, parallel-sided and end at or just behind intra-alar seta. Scutellum triangular and bright yellow. Anepisternal stripe broader than notopleuron and triangular in shape, katepisternum with a thin, linear yellow marking. Chaetotaxy: 2 scapular setae, 1 anterior notopleural seta, 1 notopleural seta, 1 anepisternal seta, 1post-alar seta, 1 intra-alar seta, 1 prescutellar acrostichal seta. Legs with all femora fulvous, fore and mid tibia fuscous and hind tibia dark fuscous. Wings (5.84±0.21) hyaline, cells bc and c colourless and without microtrichia, except for outer margin of cell c. Costal band narrow and confluent with vein R 2+3, anal streak pale and narrow and a medium-developed anal lobe. Abdomen orange-brown to red-brown with a black T-shaped pattern consisting of a transverse basal band on tergite III and a narrow medial vitta on tergites III-V; the transverse band sometimes covers the lateral margin of tergite III and continues laterally to tergite V; in some specimens the transverse band is absent. Pecten present on tergite III in males and two shiny orange ceromata present on tergite V. Deep posterior emargination present on sternite V of male.

Male Genitalia: Epandrium and surstyli elongate-oval in posterior view. Proctiger membranous, triangular, smaller than epandrium (Figure 6A). Medial surstylus longer than lateral surstylus and diminutive or tapering towards apex with a pair of thick, dark, striated prensisetae. Aedeagus 1.98 mm long excluding glans (0.43 mm). Glans tubular, mostly sclerotized with an unpatterned and narrow praeputium. Subapical lobe and basal lobe present, the former reaching above the vesica and with a distinct capitulum (Figure 6B) (cf. figs 8G in David and Ramani 2019, as dorsalis).

Material Examined: 8 ♂, INDIA, Uttarakhand, Pantnagar, 20°02’29”N 79°48’79”E 2.vii.2020, Maneesh; 10 ♂, India, Himachal Pradesh, Solan, Nauni, 30°51’24”N 77°10’17”. 28.vii.2020, Maneesh.

Male Parapheromone: Methyl eugenol.

Host Plants: A wide range of edible, commercial and native fruits (Drew et al. 2005; Rasolofoarivao et al. 2022).

Remarks: This species belongs in the dorsalis complex and is very similar to B. (B.) dorsalis (Hendel). It is often regarded as a synonym of the latter (e.g. Schutze et al. 2015) but can be differentiated by the frequent presence of extensive red-brown markings on the scutum and narrower postsutural lateral yellow vittae. The aedeagus and aculeus are also longer than in B. dorsalis and there are differences in phallus structure (Hancock et al. 2021), the glans being tubular in B. invadens and subovate in B. dorsalis. The species is widespread on the Indian subcontinent and invasive in the Afrotropics. In the Himalayan region it has been definitively recorded from Bhutan (Drew et al. 2007) and Nepal (Leblanc et al. 2019, as dorsalis) and its presence in the northwestern Indian States of Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand is confirmed here. True B. dorsalis is not known from the Indian subcontinent and its presence can be confirmed only by examination of the phallus.

Notes

Published as part of Singh, Maneesh Pal, Sharma, Isha, Hancock, David Lawrence & Prabhakar, Chandra Shekhar, 2022, A new species of Bactrocera Macquart and a new distribution record of Dacus Fabricius (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae) from India, pp. 237-250 in Zootaxa 5168 (2) on pages 245-249, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5168.2.9, http://zenodo.org/record/6877373

Files

Files (4.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:7dc38405770df6365c8625e0568e6b3d
4.7 kB Download

System files (25.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:b2986e884aabe3a8f620a4d4fd6decd3
25.6 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Event date
2020-07-02
Verbatim event date
2020-07-02
Scientific name authorship
Drew, Tsuruta and White
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
Arthropoda
Order
Diptera
Family
Tephritidae
Genus
Bactrocera
Species
invadens
Taxon rank
species

References

  • Drew, R. A. I., Tsuruta, K. & White, I. M. (2005) A new species of pest fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae) from Sri Lanka and Africa. African Journal of Entomology, 13, 149 - 154.
  • Drew, R. A. I., Romig, M. C. & Dorji, C. (2007) Records of dacine fruit flies and new species of Dacus (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Bhutan. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, 55 (1), 1 - 21.
  • David, K. J. & Ramani, S. (2019) New species, redescriptions and phylogenetic revision of tribe Dacini (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae) from India based on morphological characters. Zootaxa, 4551 (2), 101 - 146. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4551.2.1
  • Rasolofoarivao, H., Raveloson Ravoamanarivo, L. H. & Delatte, H. (2022) Host plant ranges of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Madagascar. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 112, 1 - 12. https: // doi. org / 10.1017 / S 0007485321000511
  • Schutze, M. K., Aketarawong, N., Amornsak, W., Armstrong, K. F., Augustinos, A. A., Barr, N., Bo, W., Bourtzis, K., Boykin, L. M., Caceres, C., Cameron, S. L., Chapman, T. A., Chinvinijkul, S., Chomic, A., Meyer, M. D., Drosopoulou, E., Englezo, A., Ekesi, S., Gariou-Papalexiou, A., Geib, S. M., Hailstones, D., Haasanuzzaman, M., Haymer, D., Hee, A. K. W., Hendrichs, J., Jessup, A., Ji, Q., Khami, F. M., Krosch, M. N., Leblanc, L., Mahmood, K., Malacrida, A. R., Mavraganitsipidou, P., Mwatawala, M., Nishida, R., Ono, H., Reyes, J., Rubioff, D., Sanjose, M., Shelly, T. E., Srikachar, S., Tan, K. H., Thanaphum, S., Haq, I., Vijaysegaran, S., Wee, S. L., Yesmin, F., Zacharopoulou, A. & Clarke, A. R. (2015) Synonymization of key pest species within the Bactrocera dorsalis species complex (Diptera: Tephritidae): taxonomic changes based on a review of 20 years of integrative morphological, molecular, cytogenetic, behavioural, and chemoecological data. Systematic Entomology, 40, 456 - 471. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / syen. 12113
  • Hancock, D. L., Freidberg, A. & Friedman, A. L. L. (2021) Tephritidae (true fruit flies). In: Kirk-Spriggs, A. H. & Sinclair, B. S. (Eds.), Manual of Afrotropical Diptera. Vol. 3. Brachycera-Cyclorrhapha, excluding Calyptratae. Suricata 8. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, pp. 1669 - 1734.
  • Leblanc, L., Bhandari, B. P., Aryal, A. N. & Bista, S. (2019) New country records and annotated checklist of the dacine fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacini) of Nepal. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society, 51 (2), 39 - 46.