National Center for Water Quality Research (NCWQR)
Published September 14, 2013 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Proposal for a model state watershed management act

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Florida State University College of Law
  • 2. Southern Illinois University-Carbondale
  • 3. Heidelberg College Water Quality Laboratory

Description

ABSTRACT

During the Montana Constitutional Convention of 1889, John Wesley Powell, envisioning a landscape of watershed commonwealths, proposed that Montana adopt watersheds as the boundaries of its counties. The idea did not catch on. Over time, the power of local governments to regulate land use has grown immensely, but the misfit between their political boundaries and environmental policy problem sheds has persisted. As our understanding of ecosystem dynamics improves, however, natural resources management policy is gravitating, once again, to the watershed as an appropriate unit of governance. Many federal and state natural resource management initiatives have come on line in the past five years using watersheds as their primary focus. Yet, these new programs lack coherence and invest inadequate authority in watershed-based units of government.

Representing perspectives from law, geography, economics, and anthropology, the authors propose the framework for a model state watershed management law. They conclude that the federal government is ill-equipped to take on the role of comprehensive watershed management czar as it has for pollution control and other environmental programs. Yet, local governments, even if organized around watershed boundaries, are unlikely to provide the platform for effective policy implementation. Rather, the authors propose a multi-tiered governance system linking state, regional, and local units of government through careful distribution of planning responsibilities and policy implementation authorities. Although for many states this framework would introduce a new layer of governance, its superior correspondence to the inescapable realities of ecosystem dynamics makes it worth serious consideration.

Files

SSRN-id438701.pdf

Files (215.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:8674dcd3547070abeafab44000f8a4f9
215.5 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • A. Dan Tarlock, The Potential Role of Local Governments in Watershed Management, 32 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. L. Inst.) 11,273, 11,273–74 (2002)
  • Robert W. Adler, Addressing Barriers to Watershed Protection, 25 ENVTL. L. 973, 973–1106 (1995)
  • Department of Agriculture et al., Unified Federal Policy for a Watershed Approach to Federal Land and Resource Management, 65 Fed. Reg. 62,566, 62,572 (Oct. 8, 2000)
  • Douglas S. Kenney, Historical and Sociopolitical Context of the Western Watersheds Movement, in HUMAN DIMENSIONS OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT, AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, MONOGRAPH SERIES NO. 20, 493, 493–503 (Christopher L. Lant ed., 1999)
  • J. B. Ruhl, The (Political) Science of Watershed Management in the Ecosystem Age, 35 J. AM. WATER RESOURCES ASS'N 519 (1998)
  • Alice L. Jones & Steven I. Gordon, From Plan to Practice: Implementing Watershed-Based Strategies into Local, State, and Federal Policy, 19 ENVTL. TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY 1136, 1138–41 (2000)
  • James R. Karr & Daniel R. Dudley, Ecological Perspective on Water Quality Goals, 5 ENVTL. MGMT. 55, 55–68 (1981)
  • William L. Graf, Damage Control: Restoring the Physical Integrity of America's Rivers, 91 ANNALS ASS'N AM. GEOGRAPHERS 1, 1–27 (2001)
  • Donald Snow, The Persistence of Powell: The Idea of Watersheds and Participatory Democracy, 23 J. LAND RESOURCES & ENVTL. L. 31, 37 (2003)
  • William E. Taylor & Mark Gerath, The Watershed Protection Approach: Is the Promise About to Be Realized?, 11 NAT. RESOURCES & ENV'T 16 (1996)
  • DEP'T OF THE ARMY, CORPS OF ENGINEERS, CIVIL WORKS PROGRAM STRATEGIC PLAN FY 2003–FY 2008, at 51 (2002), available at http://www.iwr.usace.army.mil/iwr/strategicplan.htm
  • Memorandum from G. Tracy Mehan, III, Assistant Administrator, EPA to Office Directors and Regional Water Division Directors, EPA (Dec. 3, 2002), [33 Current Developments] Env't Rep. (BNA) 2727 (Dec. 3, 2002), available at http://www.epa.gov/owow/watershed/memo.html
  • Notice of Availability: Draft Watershed-Based National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permitting Implementation Guidance, 68 Fed. Reg. 51,011 (Aug. 25, 2003)
  • USEPA, OFFICE OF WATER, A REVIEW OF STATEWIDE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT APPROACHES (2002)
  • NAT'L ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, NAT'L RESEARCH COUNCIL, NEW STRATEGIES FOR AMERICA'S WATERSHEDS 1 (1999)
  • J. Omernik & R. Bailey, Distinguishing Between Watersheds and Ecosystems, 33 J. AM. WATER RESOURCES ASS'N 935, 935–50 (1997)
  • MISSISSIPPI RIVER/GULF OF MEXICO WATERSHED NUTRIENT TASK FORCE, ACTION PLAN FOR REDUCING, MITIGATING, AND CONTROLLING HYPOXIA IN THE NORTHERN GULF OF MEXICO 5 (2001)
  • USEPA, WHAT ARE THE MAJOR EFFECTS OF COMMON ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTANTS ON WATER QUALITY, ECOSYSTEMS, AND HUMAN HEALTH, http://www.epa.gov/owow/oceans/airdep/air3.html
  • MARC REISNER, CADILLAC DESERT: THE AMERICAN WEST AND ITS DISAPPEARING WATER 125–26 (1993)
  • S. Kraft et al., Ecological Restoration in Multiple-Ownership Watersheds: The Case of the Cache River in Illinois—Social and Economic Issues, in GOVERNOR'S CONFERENCE ON THE MANAGEMENT OF THE ILLINOIS RIVER SYSTEM, EIGHTH BIENNIAL CONFERENCE: THE ILLINOIS RIVER: PARTNERSHIPS FOR PROGRESS, RESTORATION, AND PRESERVATION 161 (2001)
  • Joe Cannon, Choices and Institutions in Watershed Management, 25 WM. & MARY ENVTL. L. & POL'Y REV. 379, 381–91 (2000)
  • John T. Woolley et al., The California Watersheds Movement: Science and the Politics of Place, 42 NAT. RESOURCES J. 133, 134–35 (2002)
  • Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251–1387 (2000)
  • 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401–7671q (2000)
  • EPA, Water Quality Trading Policy; Issuance of Final Policy, 68 Fed. Reg. 1608, 1609 (Jan. 13, 2003)
  • JAMES SALZMAN & BARTON THOMPSON, ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY 77–122 (overview of Clean Air Act)
  • ROBERT W. ADLER ET AL., THE CLEAN WATER ACT: 20 YEARS LATER 137–70 (1993)
  • J.B. Ruhl, Farms, Their Environmental Harms, and Environmental Law, 27 ECOLOGY L.Q. 263, 265 (2000)
  • 16 U.S.C. §§ 1451–1465 (2000)
  • JOHN NAGLE & J.B. RUHL, THE LAW OF BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT 644–45 (2002)
  • Public Health Service Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300f–300j-26 (2000)
  • Faqir S. Bagi, Small Rural Communities' Quest for Safe Drinking Water, 17 RURAL AM. 40, 40–46 (2002)
  • ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON WATER INFORMATION, REPORT OF THE STREAMGAGING TASK FORCE TO THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON WATER INFORMATION OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 17 (2002)
  • Dean T. Massey, Land Use Regulatory Power of Conservation Districts in the Midwestern States for Controlling Nonpoint Source Pollutants, 33 DRAKE L. REV. 35, 37 (1983–84)
  • John Davidson, Protecting the Still Functioning Ecosystem: The Case of the Prairie Pothole Wetlands, 9 WASH. U. J.L. & POL'Y 123, 144–46 (2002)
  • John H. Davidson, Commentary: Using Special Water Districts to Control Nonpoint Sources of Water Pollution, 65 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 503, 507–18 (1989)
  • Mary R. McCorvie & Christopher L. Lant, Drainage District Formation and the Loss of Midwestern Wetlands, 1860-1930, 67 AGRIC. HIST. 13, 36 (1993)
  • Christopher Lant et al., Land Use Dynamics in a Southern Illinois U.S.A. Watershed, 28 ENVTL. MGMT. 325, 325–26 (2001)
  • Raja Sengupta et al., Evaluating the Impact of Policy-Induced Land Use Management Practices on Non-Point Source Pollution Using a Spatial Decision Support System, 25 WATER INT'L 437, 443–44 (2000)
  • ROBERT A. CATLIN, LAND USE PLANNING, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT: THE FLORIDA EXPERIENCE 56–64 (1997)
  • John M. DeGrove & Patricia M. Metzger, Growth Management and the Integrated Roles of State, Regional, and Local Governments, in GROWTH MANAGEMENT: THE PLANNING CHALLENGES OF THE 1990S 13–15 (Jay M. Stein ed., 1993)
  • WASHINGTON STATE DEP'T OF ECOLOGY, WATERSHED PLANNING, at http://www.ecy.wa.gov/watershed (last visited Nov. 16, 2003)
  • OREGON DEP'T OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, WATER QUALITY: NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION STATE AND FEDERAL INITIATIVES AND AGENCIES, at http://www.deq.state.or.us/wq/nonpoint/other.htm
  • FLA. STAT. ch. 373 (2003)
  • Mary Jane Angelo et al., Exalting the Corporate Form Over Environmental Protection: The Corporate Shell Game and the Enforcement of Water Management Law in Florida, 17 J. LAND USE & ENVTL. L. 89, 94–103 (2001)
  • Bernard Landry, A Word from the Premier, in ENVIRONMENT QUÉBEC, QUÉBEC WATER POLICY: WATER. OUR LIFE. OUR FUTURE (2002)
  • CANADIAN ENVTL. LAW ASS'N, AN ACT TO CONSERVE ONTARIO WATERS 15–16 (2001)
  • S. Ewing, Landcare and Community-Led Watershed Management in Victoria, Australia, in HUMAN DIMENSIONS OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT, AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, MONOGRAPH SERIES NO. 20, at 663–74 (Christopher L. Lant ed., 1999)
  • Eric Pyle et al., Establishing Watershed Management in Law: New Zealand's Experience, 37 J. AM. WATER RESOURCES ASS'N 783, 783–93 (2001)
  • USGS, HYDROLOGIC UNIT MAPS, http://water.usgs.gov/GIS/huc.html
  • James M. Omernik, The Misuse of Hydrologic Unit Maps for Extrapolation, Reporting, and Ecosystem Management, 39 J. AM. WATER RESOURCES ASS'N 563 (2003)
  • MARCO JANSSEN ET AL., ROBUSTNESS OF SOCIALECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS TO SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DISTURBANCE REGIMES, PAPER NO. W03-21, WORKSHOP IN POLITICAL THEORY AND POLICY ANALYSIS, INDIANA UNIVERSITY 29 (2003)