Published July 2, 2022 | Version v1
Journal article Open

INSIGHT ABOUT PRAGMATICS AND DISCOURSE ANALYSIS

Authors/Creators

  • 1. University of Kufa, Kufa, Iraq

Description

As it is known that pragmatics and discourse analysis are so interrelated that it is difficult to distinguish the limit of each or between them therefore they can be considered sister disciplines. The present study is an attempt to investigate the relationship between the two and find out their similarities, and differences. So, the study of discourse seems not to fall outside the realm of pragmatics but it is seen as a complementary part of it.

Files

323.pdf

Files (489.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:b1f917d095e58ebb1736c3dba2c89c52
489.3 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • 1. Allott, N. (2010). Key Terms in Pragmatics. London: Continuum International Publishing Group. 2. Barron, A. and Schneider, K. (2014). Discourse Pragmatics: Signposting a vast field. In Bublitz, W, Jucker, A. and Schneider, K. (Eds.) Pragmatics of Discourse. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 3. Bermejo-Luque, L. (2011). Giving Reasons: A Linguistic-Pragmatic Approach to Argumentation Theory. 4. Madrid: Springer. 5. Birner, Betty J. (2013). Introduction to Pragmatics. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 6. Bousfield, D. (2008). Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 7. Brown, G. and Yule, G. (1983) Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 8. Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge 9. University Press. 10. Coulthard, Malcolm (1985). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London : Longman . 11. Cruz, M. (2014). Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis. University of Seville. 12. Crystal, David (2003). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. Oxford: Blachwell. 13. Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25, 349-367. 14. ___(2011). Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 15. Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge. 16. de Saussure, L. (2007). Procedural Pragmatics and the Study of Discourse. Universite de Neuchatel. 17. Eemeren, F. and R. Grootendorst. (1984) Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. 18. ___ (2004) Systematic Theory of Argumentation. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. 19. Ferrara, A. (1980). An extended theory of speech acts: appropriateness conditions for subordinate acts in sequence. Journal of Pragmatics (4). 233 – 252 . 20. Fetzer, A. (2014). Conceptualizing Discourse. In Bublitz, W, Jucker, A. and Schneider, K. (Eds.) Pragmatics of Discourse. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 21. Geyer, N. (2008). Discourse and Politeness: Ambivalent Face in Japanese. London: Continuum. 22. Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1970). Cohesion in English. London: Longman. 23. Henkemans, F. (2014) Speech Act Theory and the Study of Argumentation. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 36 (49). 24. Huber, R. and Snider, A. Influencing Through Argument. New York: International Debate Education Association. 25. Horn, L. and Kecskes, I. (2013). Pragmatics, Discourse, and cognition. Yale University. 26. Isabelle, Van der Bom and Mills, S. (2015). A Discursive Approach to the Analysis of Politeness Data. Journal of Politeness Research, 11 (27), 179-206. 27. Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 28. Mey, Jacob (2001). Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell . 29. Mills, S. (2011). Discursive Approaches to Politeness and Impoliteness. In Linguistic Politeness Research 30. Group's (Eds.) Discursive Approaches to Politeness. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 31. Moeschiler, J. (1998). Speech Act Theory and the Analysis of Conversation. University of Geneva: Department of Linguistics. 32. Paltridge, B. (2006). Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum. 33. Polyzou, A. (2014). Presupposition in Discourse: Theoretical and Methodological Issues. Critical Discourse Studies, 12, 123-138. 34. Puig, M. B. (2003). Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis. In http://www.gencat.cat/llengua/noves 35. Sauerland, U. and Schumacher, P. (2015). Pragmatics: Theory and Experiment Growing Together. 36. Linguistische Berichte, 245, 3-24. 37. Sbisa, M. (1999). Presupposition, Implicature and Context in Text Understanding. Department of Philosophy, University of Trieste. 38. Schegloff, E. and Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up Closings. In (web.stanford.edu/~eckert/PDF) 39. Song, L. (2010). The Role of Context in Discourse Analysis. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 40. Vol. 1, No.6, pp. 876-879. 41. Thomas, J. (1995) Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London: Longman. 42. Van Dijk, Teun A. (1977) Text and Context. London: Longman. 43. ____(1980a) An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structures in Discourse, Interaction, and Cognition. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 44. ______2001. Critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, D. Schiffrin and H. Hamilton (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell. 45. _____(2007) The Study of Discourse: An Introduction. Discourse Studies. SAGE Publishings Ltd 46. Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding Pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold. 47. Yule, G. (1985) The Study of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 48. _________(2010) The Study of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 49. __________ (1996) Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 50. Widdowson, H. (2007). Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 51. Wodak, R. (2007). Pragmatics and Critical Discourse Analysis. Pragmatics and Cognition (15), pp. 203-225. View publication stats