Published June 3, 2022 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Cysteochila Stal 1873

  • 1. Entomological Laboratory, Graduate School of Bioresource and Bioenvironmental Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan. kodokusignal @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0002 - 2238 - 5015 & Research Fellowship for Young Scientists (DC 1), Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, Japan
  • 2. Laboratory of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Kanagawa, Japan.

Description

Genus Cysteochila Stål, 1873

Cysteochila Stål, 1873: 121. Type species by subsequent designation (Distant 1903a: 138): Monanthia? tingoides Motschulsky, 1863.

Bredenbachius Distant, 1903b: 50. Type species by subsequent designation (Distant 1903a: 139): Bredenbachius pictus Distant, 1903. Synonymized by Bergroth (1921: 104).

Diagnosis. Recognized among other tingid genera by a combination of the following characters: body oblong; maximum width across hemelytra narrower than maximum width across paranota; head shorter than its maximum width across compound eyes, with five spines; antennal segments I close to each other at their bases; bucculae contiguous with each other at anterior ends; rostrum not reaching abdominal sternite IV; pronotum convex in anterior part, tricarinate; lateral margin of pronotum emarginate in anterior part; hood roof-shaped, lower than pronotal disc at highest part; pronotal carinae carinate; paranotum reflexed, expanding inward, without longitudinal ridge, not bulged upward in posterior part, not forming a cyst; outer margin of paranotum resting on pronotal disc in its entire length; posterior process well-developed; anterior margins of hemelytra not parallel to each other at rest; costal area distinct; subcostal area subvertical; discoidal area flat; Cu (cubital) and R+M (radiomedial) veins carinate; hypocostal lamina with a single row of areolae in its entire length; ostiolar peritreme well-developed; metasternum wider than mesosternum; metasternal laminae continuous each other at posterior ends; abdominal sternites IV–VIII in male and IV–VII in female each with a transverse furrow throughout their width; pygophore elevated at center of venter; ovipositor with well-developed ovivalvula at base; and paratergite IX in female unilobed.

Remarks. The genus Cysteochila comprises 128 species from the Old World (Drake & Ruhoff 1965a, 1965b; Linnavuori 1977; Duarte Rodrigues 1982a, 1982b, 1982c, 1982d, 1983, 1988, 1990, 1992; Péricart 1982, 1983, 1985b; Péricart & Golub 1996; Guilbert 2001, 2002, 2006, 2008; Deckert & Göllner-Scheiding 2006; Aukema et al. 2013; Guilbert & Heiss 2016). In Japan, four species, namely, C. chiniana, C. consueta, C. monstrosa, and C. vota, have been recorded to date (Scott 1874, 1880; Drake 1942, 1948b; Drake & Ruhoff 1965a; Miyamoto & Yasunaga 1989; Yamada & Tomokuni 2012; Yamada & Ishikawa 2016). Here, we identified two species of Cysteochila from Japan. Although a key to the Japanese species of the genus has been provided by Yamada & Tomokuni (2012), we provide a key to these two species.

Cysteochila and Physatocheila are closely related to each other, and their delimitation has been discussed by Péricart (1979, 1982, 1983, 1992). According to this author, Cysteochila can be distinguished from Physatocheila by the following characteristics: paranotum bulged upward in posterior part, forming a cyst; outer margin of paranotum not resting on pronotal disc in its entire length; metasternum wider than mesosternum; metasternal lamina curved outward; and ovipositor without ovivalvula at base. However, the type species of the genus, C. tingoides (Motschulsky, 1863) (Fig. 3A–D), does not match the definition of Cysteochila provided by Péricart (1979) in the paranotum being not bulged upward in the posterior part, not forming a cyst, and the outer margin resting on the pronotal disc in its entire length. In addition, based on the comparison of C. tingoides and P. costata (Fabricius, 1794) (Fig. 15A–D), Cysteochila and Physatocheila can be easily differentiated based on the following three major characteristics: maximum width across hemelytra narrower than maximum width across paranota; lateral margin of pronotum emarginate in anterior part; and metasternal laminae continuous each other at posterior ends. Therefore, we redefined the morphological characteristics shared by Cysteochila species, as described in the Diagnosis section above.

Cysteochila resembles Baeochila Drake & Poor, 1937 in general appearance but differs in the following characteristics: lateral margin of pronotum emarginate in anterior part; hood roof-shaped, lower than pronotal disc at highest part; anterior margins of hemelytra not parallel to each other at rest; and metasternal laminae continuous each other at posterior ends. In contrast, Baeochila presents the following characteristics: lateral margin of pronotum not emarginate in anterior part; hood semi-globose or semi-ellipsoid, higher than pronotal disc at highest part; anterior margins of hemelytra nearly parallel to each other at rest; and metasternal laminae separated from each other at posterior ends.

Notes

Published as part of Souma, Jun & Ishikawa, Tadashi, 2022, Taxonomic review of the tingine genera Cysteochila, Hurdchila, Physatocheila, and Xynotingis from Japan, with description of a new genus (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Tingidae), pp. 1-42 in Zootaxa 5150 (1) on pages 3-4, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5150.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/6609961

Files

Files (5.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:3f8bbbab2ab79455f6e2fa3e98b3179b
5.3 kB Download

System files (32.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:66aa7238373a19692bd461f43714ca2f
32.5 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Scientific name authorship
Stal
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
Arthropoda
Order
Hemiptera
Family
Tingidae
Genus
Cysteochila
Taxon rank
genus
Taxonomic concept label
Cysteochila Stal, 1873 sec. Souma & Ishikawa, 2022

References

  • Stal, C. (1873) Enumeratio Hemipterorum. 3. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar, Neue Folge, 11 (2), 1 - 163.
  • Distant, W. L. (1903 a) The Fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Rhynchota. - Vol. II. (Heteroptera). Part 1. Taylor and Francis, London, 242 pp.
  • Distant, W. L. (1903 b) Contributions to a knowledge of the Rhynchota. Annales de la Societ Entomologie de Belgique, 47, 43 - 65.
  • Bergroth, E. (1921) On the types of the exotic Hemiptera Heteroptera described by V. Motschulsky. Revue Russe d'Entomologie, 17, 96 - 109.
  • Drake, C. J. & Ruhoff, F. A. (1965 a) Lacebugs of the world, a catalog (Hemiptera: Tingidae). Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 243, i - viii + 1 - 634, pls. frontis piece + 1 - 56. https: // doi. org / 10.5479 / si. 03629236.243.1
  • Drake, C. J. & Ruhoff, F. A. (1965 b) Lacebugs from New Guinea, Borneo, Solomons, and other islands of the South Pacific and Indian oceans (Hemiptera: Tingidae). Pacific Insects, 7 (2), 243 - 290.
  • Linnavuori, R. (1977) Hemiptera of the Sudan, with remarks on some species of the adjacent countries 5. Tingidae, Piesmidae, Cydnidae, Thaumastellidae and Plataspidae. Acta Zoologica Fennica, 147 1 - 81.
  • Duarte Rodrigues, P. (1982 a) African Tingidae, XVII: Eleven new species, new synonyms and new data of Cysteochila Stal (Heteroptera). Eos, 57, 69 - 90.
  • Duarte Rodrigues, P. (1982 b) African Tingidae, XXI: Lacebugs in the British Museum (Natural History) (Heteroptera). Arquivos do Museu Bocage, Serie C, Suplementos, 1 (5), 134 - 199.
  • Duarte Rodrigues, P. (1982 c) African Tingidae, XXII: Lacebugs in the Plant Protection Research Institute (Pretoria) (Heteroptera). Arquivos do Museu Bocage, Serie C, Suplementos, 1 (6), 201 - 253.
  • Duarte Rodrigues, P. (1982 d) African Tingidae, XXIV, Some Lacebugs in the Musee Royal de l'Afrique Centrale, with the description of five new species (Heteroptera). Revue de zoologie africaine, 96 (3), 570 - 590.
  • Duarte Rodrigues, P. (1983) Lacebugs from Ghana and Congo-Brazzaville in the Hungarian Natural History Museum (Heteroptera) African Tingidae. XXXIX. Folia entomologica Hungarica Rovartani kozlemenyek, 4 (2), 299 - 301.
  • Duarte Rodrigues, P. (1988) African Tingidae, XXVIII: New species and new data from South and South West Africa (Heteroptera) Boletim da Sociedade Portuguesa de Entomologia 67, 493 - 514.
  • Duarte Rodrigues, P. (1990) African Tingidae, XLVII: Nine new species and new data from Southern Africa (Heteroptera). Arquivos do Museu Paranaense, Nova Serie, 1 (44), 625 - 659.
  • Duarte Rodrigues, P. (1992) Insectes Heteropteres Tingidae. Faune de Madagascar, 78, 1 - 94. [in French]
  • Pericart, J. (1982) Revision systematique des Tingidae Ouest-palearctiques (Hemiptera). 9. Complements et corrections. Annales de la Societ Entomologique de France, New Series, 18, 349 - 372. [in French, English summary]
  • Pericart, J. (1983) Hemipteres Tingidae euro-mediterraneens. Faune de France, 69, 1 - 620. [in French]
  • Pericart, J. (1985 b) Insects of Saudi Arabia. Hemiptera: Fam. Tingidae (Part 2). Fauna of Saudi Arabia, 6, 210 - 218.
  • Pericart, J. & Golub, V. B. (1996) Superfamily Tingoidea Laporte, 1832. In: Aukema, B. & Rieger, C. (Eds.), Catalogue of the Heteroptera of the Palaearctic Region. Vol. 2, Cimicomorpha I. The Netherlands Entomological Society, Amsterdam, pp. 3 - 78.
  • Guilbert, E. (2001) Western Pacific Tingidae (Heteroptera): New species and new records. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 46 (2), 543 - 554.
  • Guilbert, E. (2002) New data on New Caledonian Tingidae (Hemiptera). In: Grandcoras, P. & Najt, J. (Eds.), Zoologia Neocaledonica 5. Systematique et endemisme en Nouvelle-Caledonie. Museum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris, pp. 133 - 160.
  • Guilbert, E. (2006) New species and new records of Tingidae (Insecta: Heteroptera) of New Guinea. Zootaxa, 1117 (1), 37 - 68. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 1117.1.3
  • Guilbert, E. (2008) New data on the Tingidae from Gabon (Hemiptera: Heteroptera). Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae, 48 (2), 491 - 495.
  • Deckert, J. & Gollner-Scheiding, U. (2006) Lace bugs of Namibia (Heteroptera, Tingoidea, Tingidae). In: Rabitsch, W. (Ed.), Hug the bug - For love of true bugs. Festschrift zum 70. Geburtstag von Ernst Heiss. Denisia, 19, pp. 823 - 856.
  • Aukema, B., Rieger, C. & Rabitsch, W. (2013) Catalogue of the Heteroptera of the Palaearctic Region. Vol. 6, Supplement. The Netherlands Entomological Society, Amsterdam, xxiv + 629 pp.
  • Guilbert, E. & Heiss, E. (2016) First fossil records of Tingidae from Madagascan Copal with description of two new species (Hemiptera, Heteroptera). Linzer biologische Beitrage, 48 (2), 1081 - 1090.
  • Scott, J. (1874) On a collection of Hemiptera Heteroptera from Japan. Descriptions of various new genera and species [part 1]. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 4, 14 (82), 289 - 304. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 00222937408680968
  • Scott, J. (1880) On a collection of Hemiptera from Japan. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 1880, 305 - 317. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1365 - 2311.1880. tb 02032. x
  • Drake, C. J. (1942) New Tingitidae (Hemiptera). Iowa State College Journal of Science, 17, 1 - 21.
  • Drake, C. J. (1948 b) Some Tingidae (Hemiptera) from China, Japan and India. Notes d'Entomologie Chinoise, 12 (1), 1 - 9.
  • Miyamoto, S. & Yasunaga, T. (1989) Heteroptera. In: Hirashima, Y. (Ed.), A Check List of Japanese Insects. I. Laboratory of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, pp. 151 - 188. [in Japanese]
  • Pericart, J. (1979) Insects of Saudi Arabia. Hemiptera: Fam. Tingidae. Fauna of Saudi Arabia, 1, 105 - 114. [in French, English summary]
  • Pericart, J. (1992) Tingidae (Tinginae) d'Arabie, de la region Orientale et d'Australie, avec la description d'un genre nouveau et de 14 especes nouvelles (Hemiptera). Entomologica Basiliensia, 15, 45 - 86. [in French, English summary]