Published April 17, 2022 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Protective effect conferred by prior infection and vaccination on COVID-19 in a healthcare worker cohort in South India

  • 1. Christian Medical College & Hospital

Description

The emergence of newer variants with the immune escape potential raises concerns about breakthroughs and re-infections resulting in future waves of infection. We examined the protective effect of prior COVID-19 disease and vaccination on infection rates among a cohort of healthcare workers (HCW) in South India during the second wave driven mainly by the delta variant. Symptomatic HCWs were routinely tested by RT-PCR as per institutional policy. Vaccination was offered to all HCWs in late January, and the details were documented. We set up a non-concurrent cohort to document infection rates and estimated protective efficacy of prior infection and vaccination between 16th Apr to 31st May 2021, using a Cox proportional hazards model with time-varying covariates adjusting for daily incidence.

Between June 2020 and May 2021, 2735 (23.9%) of 11,405 HCWs were infected, with 1412, including 32 re-infections, reported during the second wave. 6863 HCWs received two doses of vaccine and 1905 one dose. The protective efficacy of prior infection against symptomatic infection was 86.0% (95% CI 76.7% - 91.6%). Vaccination combined with prior infection provided 91.1% (95% CI 84.1% - 94.9%) efficacy. In the absence of prior infection, vaccine efficacy against symptomatic infection during the second wave was 31.8% (95% CI 23.5% – 39.1%).

Prior infection provided substantial protection against symptomatic re-infection and severe disease during a delta variant-driven second wave in a cohort of health care workers.

Notes

Kaplan Meier Survival analysis was done with failure defined as the acquisition of infection during the analysis period. A Log-rank test was performed to compare the survival curves across the four risk groups.  We developed a Cox-proportional hazards (PH) model with time-varying covariates adjusting for smoothed daily incidence of COVID-19 and potential confounders (S1 table). The model included participant age, type of work, sex, history of prior infection, and vaccination, as epidemiologically relevant factors. The model was tested for the proportional-hazards assumption on Schoenfeld's residuals and the PH assumption was not violated (p-value - 0.134). Efficacy of prior infection and vaccines to prevent symptomatic infection in the study period were calculated as VE= 1- hazard ratio from the Cox proportional hazard model. All data analysis was performed using Stata 15.1 (Statacorp LLC, College Station, TX).

Files

README_MURUGESAN2022.txt

Files (629.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:37fbb76cd71526af6738534c0b35c7f3
616.7 kB Download
md5:55ccd3e6343dbe3ac40bcfbe5ffd8930
12.5 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is derived from
10.5281/zenodo.6137680 (DOI)