Netzeliidae KOSAKYAN ET AL. 2016
Description
FAMILY NETZELIIDAE KOSAKYAN ET AL., 2016
Type species: Netzelia oviformis (Cash, 1909).
Updated diagnosis: Globular or oviform tests, with radial symmetry. Aperture is central, regular or lobed and forms a collar towards the outside of the test. Presence of irregular, ‘nail’-shaped idiosomes or/and exogenous materials, when these are available.
Included taxa: (Supporting Information, Appendix S1).
Difflugia lobostoma Leidy, 1874 and Difflugia lithophila Penard, 1902 share many traits with members of the genus Netzelia, such as Netzelia achlora (Penard, 1902), Netzelia gramen (Penard, 1902) and Netzelia oviformis (Cash, 1909), placed in the genus Netzelia by Gomaa et al. (2017). The main reason for the similarity between these species was the capacity to build a test with idiosomes independently from the presence of building material (Ogden, 1979). Later works showed that Difflugia lobostoma also had this ability, justifying its inclusion within the genus Netzelia (Medioli et al., 1987). Furthermore, both D. lobostoma and D. lithophila have planktonic life-stages, like many Sphaerothecina. Cucurbitella in turn, has been included into Sphaerothecina (Lahr et al., 2019) based on its round/oval-shaped test and the presence of a collar around the aperture, but classified as incertae sedis. Nevertheless, this genus shares with the genus Netzelia the ability of building a test without incorporating foreign particles (Medioli et al., 1987). Our phylogenetic tree shows (Fig. 1) that D. lithophila, D. lobostoma and Cucurbitella mespiliformis form a clade sister to the familyArcellidae, therefore we include the genus Cucurbitella with the family Netzeliidae and transfer D. lithophila and D. lobostoma to the genus Netzelia (see Supporting Information, Appendix S1).
Differential diagnosis between genera: Cucurbitella differs from Netzelia as the development of its collar creates an internal diaphragm, forming a second chamber with a central aperture (Fig. 9).
Notes
Files
Files
(737 Bytes)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:445611399143a6c7115d1c4a63252ee3
|
737 Bytes | Download |
System files
(18.9 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:009b3ac19347838d2b29e7c519b8104a
|
18.9 kB | Download |
Linked records
Additional details
Identifiers
Biodiversity
- Scientific name authorship
- KOSAKYAN ET AL.
- Kingdom
- Protozoa
- Phylum
- Amoebozoa
- Order
- Arcellinida
- Family
- Netzeliidae
- Taxon rank
- family
- Taxonomic concept label
- Netzeliidae ET, 2016 sec. González-Miguéns, Soler-Zamora, Villar-Depablo, Todorov & Lara, 2022
References
- Leidy J. 1874. Notice of some new fresh-water rhizopods. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 3 rd Series 26: 77-79.
- Penard E. 1902. Faune rhizopodique du bassin du Leman. Geneve: Henry Kundig.
- Gomaa F, Lahr DJG, Todorov M, Li J, Lara E. 2017. A contribution to the phylogeny of agglutinating Arcellinida (Amoebozoa) based on SSU rRNA gene sequences. European Journal of Protistology 59: 99-107.
- Ogden CG. 1979. Siliceous structures secreted by members of the subclass Lobosia (Rhizopodea: Protozoa). Bulletin of the British Museum [Natural History]. Zoology 36: 203-207.
- Medioli FS, Scott DB, Abbott BH. 1987. A case study of protozoan intraclonal variability: taxonomic implications. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 17: 28-47.
- Lahr DJG, Kosakyan A, Lara E, Mitchell EAD, Morais L, Porfirio-Sousa AL, Ribeiro GM, Tice AK, Panek T, Kang S, Brown MW. 2019. Phylogenomics and morphological reconstruction of Arcellinida testate amoebae highlight diversity of microbial eukaryotes in the Neoproterozoic. Current Biology 29: 991-1001.