Vitamin C supplementation and the common cold: was Linus Pauling right or wrong?

Abstract:

In 1970 Linus Pauling claimed that vitamin C prevents and alleviates the episodes of the common cold. Pauling was correct in concluding from trials published up till then, that in general vitamin C does have biological effects on the common cold, but he was rather over-optimistic as regards the size of benefit. His quantitative conclusions were based on a single placebo-controlled trial on schoolchildren in a skiing camp in the Swiss Alps, in which a significant decrease in common cold incidence and duration in the group administered 1 g/day of vitamin C was found. As children in a skiing camp are not a representative sample of the general population, Pauling's extrapolation to the population at large was too bold, erring as to the magnitude of the effect. Nevertheless, Pauling's general conclusion that vitamin C has physiological effects on the common cold is of major importance as it conflicts with the prevailing consensus that the only physiological effect of vitamin C on human beings is to prevent scurvy.

Hemilä H. Vitamin C supplementation and the common cold - was Linus Pauling right or wrong?
International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research 1997;67:329-335. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9350474/

The paper is made freely available with the permission of the publisher of the journal. This volume is not available via the internet, whereas starting from 1999 the journal is available:
https://www.hogrefe.com/ch/zeitschrift/international-journal-for-vitamin-and-nutrition-research