Published March 8, 2022 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Lituites Bertrand 1763

  • 1. Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Faculty of Science, Charles University Prague, Albertov 6, Prague, 12843, Czech Republic. & Institute of Geology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Rozvojová 269, Prague, 16500, Czech Republic.
  • 2. Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung, Invalidenstrasse 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany.

Description

Genus Lituites Bertrand, 1763

Type species

Lituites lituus de Montfort, 1808; by original designation.

Diagnosis

Genus of the family Lituitidae with tightly or loosely coiled apical part of the conch; uncoiled part straight or variably curved; expansion angle up to ca 8°. Whorl profile compressed in the coiled and backcoiled part and circular in the straight part of the conch. Shell surface with sinuous annuli and/or lirae. Siphuncle position changes from subdorsal to subcentral during ontogeny. Fully mature aperture

with a pair of pronounced ventrolateral lappets, similar but shorter dorsolateral lappets and a low dorsal projection (after Furnish & Glenister 1964, emended).

Species included

Lituites anguinus Angelin, 1880; Lituites anhuiense Qi, 1980; Lituites baculus sp. nov.; Lituites bottkei sp. nov.; Lituites clavis sp. nov.; Lituites dewitzi sp. nov.; Lituites evolutus Fang, Chen & Zhang in Fang et al., 2017; Lituites fallax Remelé, 1890; Lituites hengshanensis Qi, 1980; Lituites kruegeri sp. nov.; Lituites lii Yü, 1930; Lituites Lasaulxii Remelé, 1890; Lituites lituus de Montfort, 1808; Lituites nebeni sp. nov., Lituites ningkiangense Lai, 1965; Lituites perfectus Wahlenberg, 1818; Lituites procerus Remelé, 1890; Lituites tenuicaulis Remelé, 1890; Lituites Törnquisti Holm, 1891; Lituites wuweiense Qi, 1980 (synonym of L. ningkiangense Lai, 1965); Lituites xizangense Lai, 1982.

Remarks

Most species of the genus Lituites known from Baltoscandia and erratics in north central and eastern Europe were described already in the 19 th century. Differences between the species concern mainly the mode of coiling, the shape of the whorl profile, the degree of curvature of the backcoiled part, the expansion angle and the shell ornament (Aubrechtová & Meidla 2020: 278, table 2). However, the apparently high intraspecific variation and common morphological transitions between the species make it often difficult to distinguish between them. An additional problem is that the species were originally defined based on the coiled and backcoiled parts of the conch. The straight part and mature aperture are not known in most of the species, which makes it impossible to taxonomically determine specimens consisting only of the uncoiled part (Holm 1891).

Geographic and stratigraphic occurrence

Argentina, Baltoscandia, northern Germany, northern Poland, Kaliningrad Region of Russia, Bohemia, Lhasa Terrane (North Tibet), North and South China; Middle to Late Ordovician.

Notes

Published as part of Aubrechtová, Martina & Korn, Dieter, 2022, Taxonomy and ontogeny of the Lituitida (Cephalopoda) from Orthoceratite Limestone erratics (Middle Ordovician), pp. 1-108 in European Journal of Taxonomy 799 (1) on pages 46-47, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.799.1681, http://zenodo.org/record/6341270

Files

Files (3.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:0149e9f1186e4967fb5e7380c8077191
3.1 kB Download

System files (23.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:1254e489293afc3b3a3e37182108624a
23.0 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Scientific name authorship
Bertrand
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
Mollusca
Order
Orthocerida
Family
Lituitidae
Genus
Lituites
Taxon rank
genus
Taxonomic concept label
Lituites Bertrand, 1763 sec. Aubrechtová & Korn, 2022

References

  • de Montfort P. D. 1808. Conchyliologie systematique, et classification methodique des coquilles: offrant leurs figures, leur arrangement generique, leurs descriptions caracteristiques, leurs noms, ainsi que leur synonymie en plusieurs langues. F. Schoell, Paris. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 10571
  • Furnish W. M. & Glenister B. F. 1964. Nautiloidea-Tarphycerida. In: Moore R. C. (ed.) Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology: K 343 - K 368. The Geological Survey of America and The University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, KS.
  • Angelin N. P. 1880. Fragmenta silurica e dono Caroli Henrici Wegelin: Opus studio Nicolai Petri Angelin inchoatum jussu et impensis Academiae regiae scientiarum suecicae edendum curavit G. Lindstrom. Samson & Wallin, Stockholm [Holmiae]. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 63278
  • Qi D. 1980. Ordovician cephalopods from Wuwei of Anhui and their stratigraphical significance. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 19: 245 - 261.
  • Fang X., Chen T., Zhang Y. & Zhang Y. 2017. Lituitidae nautiloids from the Datianba Formation (Uppermost Darriwilian to Sandbian, Ordovician) in western Hunan Province and its ontogenical study. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 56: 331 - 346.
  • Lai C. 1965. Ordovician and Silurian cephalopods from the Hanzhung and Ningkiang of Shenzi. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 13: 308 - 342.
  • Wahlenberg G. 1818. Petrificata telluris Suecana. Uppsala, p. 83.
  • Holm G. 1891. Om mynningen hos Lituites Breyn. Geologiska Foreningen i Stockholm Forhandlingar 13: 736 - 780. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 11035899109445850
  • Aubrechtova M. & Meidla T. 2020. Lituitid cephalopods from the upper Darriwilian and basal Sandbian (Middle - Upper Ordovician) of Estonia. GFF 142 (4): 267 - 296. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 11035897.2020.1762723