Published March 1, 2022 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Genetic structure in the nonbreeding range of rufa Red Knots suggests distinct Arctic breeding populations

  • 1. University of Groningen
  • 2. Royal Ontario Museum
  • 3. Fundación Inalafquen & International Conservation Fund of Canada*
  • 4. Wildife Restoration Partnerships LLC**

Description

An understanding of the migratory connectivity between breeding and nonbreeding areas is fundamental to the management of long-distance migrants under pressure from habitat change along their flyways. Here we describe evidence for genetic structure within the nonbreeding range of the endangered Arctic-Canadian rufa subspecies of Red Knots (Calidris canutus). Using blood and tissue samples from the major nonbreeding regions in Argentina (Tierra del Fuego and Río Negro), northern Brazil (Maranhão), and southeastern USA (Florida), we estimated genetic structure in 514 amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) loci, applying cluster assignment analyses in DAPC, assignPOP, and STRUCTURE. Using a priori location information, individuals could be correctly re-assigned to their nonbreeding regions, which validated that the assignment accuracy of the data was sufficient. Without using a priori location information, we detected 3–5 genotype clusters, and posterior assignment probabilities of samples to these genotype clusters varied among the three regions. Lastly a chi-square test confirmed that allele frequencies varied significantly among nonbreeding regions, rejecting the hypothesis that samples were drawn from a single gene pool. Our findings hint at undescribed structure within the Red Knot rufa breeding range in the Canadian Arctic and indicate that each rufa nonbreeding area in this study hosts a different subsample of these breeding populations. The observation that nonbreeding sites of rufa Red Knots contain different genetic pools argues for separate conservation management of these sites.

Notes

See VERKUIL 2021_DATA README.txt

 

Full dataset: AFLPforStructureRufaRoselaari4Pops

 

In summary:

For DAPC and assignPOP analyses use:

AFLP35missing.txt

For STRUCTURE analyses use:

AFLPforStructureRufaRoselaari4PopsLessthen35missing.txt

Chi_square test use:

All_testCHI2.txt

TdF-Mar_testCHI.txt

Florida-Mar_testCHI.txt

TdF-Florida_testCHI.txt

Funding provided by: ROM Governor's Fund*
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number:

Funding provided by: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000038
Award Number: 403501

Funding provided by: BirdLife Netherlands
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100018722
Award Number:

Funding provided by: BirdLife Netherlands
Crossref Funder Registry ID:

Files

AFLP35missing.txt

Files (2.2 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:9fedb2c2bc7a4821348bbe5208ff1680
106.3 kB Preview Download
md5:597bf5bb6b46ec14f0e1d8c0b0e5e445
461.3 kB Preview Download
md5:fe4c009f95ed10fb437b35ff5ca23b4e
201.2 kB Preview Download
md5:7785d71bc08fcc3e70fdb5427eb956b2
487.9 kB Preview Download
md5:f93656139b30df496d48fc04c559da4e
255.0 kB Preview Download
md5:255166e5f4c2b23d8e6ad865bf780775
381.2 kB Preview Download
md5:89ea5cd09c8433fd07f796ff5ab4e8a9
342.2 kB Preview Download
md5:cc44981e3f97aaef375502386238c939
8.5 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is cited by
10.1093/ornithapp/duab053 (DOI)