Statinia
Authors/Creators
Description
54. Statinia
[Statinia] Meigen, 1800: 36.
CURRENT STATUS: Unavailable name; work suppressed for the purposes of zoological nomenclature by action of I.C.Z.N. (1963: 339 [Opinion 678]); treated under Coremacera Rondani, 1856 [teste Rozkošný & Elberg (1984: 178)].
Statinia Latreille, 1802: 460
ORIGINALLY INCLUDED SPECIES: Musca marginata Fabricius, 1775.
TYPE SPECIES: Musca marginata Fabricius, 1775, by monotypy.
CURRENT STATUS: Senior synonym of Coremacera Rondani, 1856. New Synonymy.
FAMILY: SCIOMYZIDAE.
REMARKS: Statinia was originally proposed by Meigen (1800: 36) without included species and later made unavailable by the suppression of the entire work for the purposes of zoological nomenclature by action of the I.C.Z.N. (1963: 339 [Opinion 678]). Latreille (1802: 460) was the first subsequent usage of Statinia after Meigen (1800) where Statinia was placed in synonymy with Musca Linnaeus, 1758, sensu lato [“ tetanocerae ”] and included the single species Musca marginata Fabricius, 1775, which is the type species by monotypy. Statinia was made available by subsequent usage as a valid name in Hendel (1908: 64). Hendel (1924: 211) designated Musca marginata Fabricius, 1775 as type species, but this was unnecessary since Latreille’s (1802) treatment of Statinia included only one species, thus Musca marginata Fabricius is the type species by monotypy. Musca marginata Fabricius, 1775 is currently treated as a species of Coremacera Rondani, 1856 [teste Rozkošný & Elberg (1984: 178)], which makes Statinia Latreille, 1802 a senior synonym of Coremacera Rondani, 1856, n. syn. Melville (1960: 38–39), who considered Statinia synonymous with Dictya Meigen, 1803, gave a detailed summary of the problems surrounding the identity of Statinia based on the belief that Hendel (1908: 64) was the first inclusion of species in this genus. Hendel listed Musca cucularia Linnaeus, 1767 [as “ M. cucullaria ... F.”] and Musca umbrarum Linnaeus, 1758 [as “ umbrarum F.”], the concept of which caused Statinia to be treated in synonymy with Dictya Meigen, 1803. Acceptance of Statinia Latreille, 1802 as senior to Coremacera Rondani, 1856 may threaten the stability and nomenclature of the younger name. If this is found to be true, an application to the ICZN Commission to suppress Statinia Latreille, 1802 in favor of Coremacera Rondani, 1856 may be warranted.
Notes
Files
Files
(3.1 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:da759317f0cc853be13f0f564c365327
|
3.1 kB | Download |
System files
(38.2 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:d6132da87883f8792bd8d8d1241384f0
|
38.2 kB | Download |
Linked records
Additional details
Identifiers
Biodiversity
- Kingdom
- Animalia
- Phylum
- Arthropoda
- Order
- Diptera
- Family
- Sciomyzidae
- Genus
- Statinia
- Taxon rank
- genus
References
- Meigen, J. W. (1800) Nouvelle classification des mouches a deux ailes (Diptera L.) d'apres un plan tout nouveau. Par J. G. Meigen. " An VIII (1800 v. s.) ". J. J. Fuchs, Paris, 40 pp. [before 22 September] [Dated from Thompson et al. (1999: 476).] https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 119764
- Rondani, C. (1856) Dipterologiae Italicae prodromus. Vol. I. Genera Italica ordinis dipterorum ordinatim disposita et distincta et in familias et stirpes aggregata. A. Stoccih [sic], Parmae [= Parma], 226 + [2] pp. [10 September] [Dated from advertisement from publisher in Stettiner Entomologische Zeitung.] https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 8160
- Rozkosny, R. & Elberg, K. (1984) Family Sciomyzidae (Tetanoceridae). In: Soos, A. & Papp, L. (Eds.), Catalogue of Palaearctic Diptera. Vol. 9. Micropezidae-Agromyzidae. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, pp. 167 - 192. [15 October] [Dated from Evenhuis (2008).]
- Latreille, P. A. (1802) Histoire naturelle, generale et particuliere, des crustaces et des insectes. Ouvrage faisant suite a l'histoire naturelle generale et particuliere, composee par Leclerc de Buffon, et redigee par C. S. Sonnini, membre de plusieurs societes savantes. Tome troisieme Familles naturelles des genres. " An X. " Dufart, Paris, xii + 13 - 467 + [1] pp. [6 November] [Dated from Evenhuis (1997).] http: // dx. doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 15764
- Fabricius, J. C. (1775) Systema entomologiae, sistens insectorvm classes, ordines, genera, species adiectis synonymis, locis, descriptionibvs, observationibvs. Kortii, Flensbvrgi et Lipsiae [= Flensburg & Leipzig], [32] + 832 pp. [30 April] [For dating see Evenhuis (1997).] https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 36510
- Linnaeus, C. (1758) Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Tomus I. Editio decima, reformata. L. Salvii, Holmiae [= Stockholm], [4] + 823 + [1 (Emendanda)] pp. [1 January] https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 542
- Hendel, F. (1908) Nouvelle classification des mouches a deux ailes (Diptera L.). D'apres un plan tout nouveau par J. G. Meigen, Paris, an VIII (1800 v. s.). Mit Kommentar herausgegeben von Friedrich Hendel. Verhandlungen der K. - k. Zoologisch- Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien, 58, 43 - 69. [22 April]
- Melville, R. V. (1960) Report on Mr. C. W. Sabrosky's proposal for the suppression under the Plenary Powers of the pamphlet entitled " Nouvelle classification des mouches a deux ailes " by J. W. Meigen, 1800. Z. N. (S). 191. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 18 (1), 9 - 64. [5 December]
- Meigen, J. W. (1803) Versuch einer neuen Gattungs-Eintheilung der europaischen zweiflugligen Insekten. Magazin fur Insektenkunde, 2, 259 - 281. [after 17 May] [Dated from Thompson et al. (1999: 476).]
- Linnaeus, C. (1767) Systema naturae. Tom. I. Pars II. Editio duodecima reformata. L. Salvii, Holmiae [= Stockholm], pp. 533 - 1327. [14 June] [Dated from Evenhuis (1997).] https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 68927