Published December 8, 2021 | Version v1

Dock‐based and dockless bikesharing systems: analysis of equitable access for disadvantaged communities

  • 1. University of California, Davis
  • 2. University of Maryland

Description

Dockless bikeshare systems show potential for replacing traditional dock-based systems, primarily by offering greater flexibility for bike returns. However, many cities in the US currently regulate the maximum number of bikes a dockless system can deploy due to bicycle management issues. Despite inventory management challenges, dockless systems offer two main advantages over dock-based systems: a lower (sometimes zero) membership fee, and being free-range (or, at least free-range within designated service areas). Moreover, these two advantages may help to solve existing access barriers for disadvantaged populations. To date, much of the research on micro-mobility options has focused on addressing equity issues in dock-based systems. We have limited knowledge of whether, and the extent to which dockless systems might help mitigate barriers to bikeshare for disadvantaged populations. Using San Francisco and Los Angeles as case studies, because both cities have both dock-based and dockless systems running concurrently, we quantify bikeshare service levels for communities of concern (CoCs) by analyzing the spatial distribution of service areas, available bikes and bike idle times, trip data, and rebalancing among the dock-based and dockless systems. We find that dockless systems can provide greater availability of bikes for CoCs than for other communities, attracting more trip demand in these communities because of a larger service area and frequent bike rebalancing practices. More importantly, we notice that the existence of electric bikes helps mitigate the bikeshare usage gap between CoCs and other tracts. Besides the data analyses for bikeshare trips, we also study the spatial distribution of online suggested station locations and find that the participants' desired destinations for work/school purposes have not been covered to the same extent in CoCs as in other communities. Our results provide policy insights to local municipalities on how to properly regulate and develop dockless bikeshare systems to improve mobility equity.

Notes

Please refer to the data method section

Funding provided by: California Department of Transportation
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004811
Award Number: 65A0686 Task Order 023

Files

Los_Angeles_Bikeshare_data.zip

Files (367.6 MB)

Name Size
md5:ac90ab5d6bfec25f196f66336723d462
293.0 MB Preview Download
md5:2b8d67e6b0d3ab364a9ecad81afe7504
23.5 MB Preview Download
md5:6fbbf7e53e09bbe23918edbc5445319b
749.4 kB Preview Download
md5:b4c30c7a25030bb6be8128349e85057e
19.8 kB Download
md5:5e97bedd6e283065f8eaa59c26953019
49.7 MB Preview Download
md5:1d84d581d633efa0850da720a37c6b4c
194.8 kB Preview Download
md5:c957baffe5728c00a7efe61be8633f93
365.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works