Published November 24, 2021 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Effects of different types of low-intensity management on plant-pollinator interactions in Estonian grasslands

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research

Description

In the face of global pollinator decline, extensively-managed grasslands play an important role in supporting stable pollinator communities. However, different types of extensive management may promote particular plant species and thus particular functional traits. As the functional traits of flowering plant species (e.g. flower size and shape) in a habitat determine the identity and frequency of pollinator visitors, they can also influence the structures of plant-pollinator interaction networks. The aim of this study was to examine how the type of low-intensity traditional management influences plant and pollinator composition, the structure of plant-pollinator interactions, and their mediation by floral and insect functional traits. Specifically, we compared mown wooded meadows to grazed alvar pastures in western Estonia. We found that both management types fostered equal diversity of plants and pollinators, and overlapping, though still distinct, plant and pollinator compositions. Wooded meadows had significantly higher connectance and specialisation, while alvar pastures achieved higher Shannon diversity at a standardised sampling of interactions. Pollinators with small body sizes and short proboscis lengths were more specialised in their preference for particular plant species and the specialisation of individual pollinators was higher in alvar pastures than in wooded meadows. All in all, the two management types promoted diverse plant and pollinator communities, which enabled the development of equally even and nested pollination networks. The same generalist plants and pollinators were important for the pollination networks of both wooded meadows and alvar pastures; however, they were complemented by management-specific species, which accounted for differences in network structure. Therefore, the implementation of both management types in the same landscape helps to maintain high species and interaction diversity.

Notes

Plant_pollinator_interactions_Estonia2018: The results of the plant-pollinator interaction survey at each transect and site.

Plant_survey_Estonia2018: The results of the plant survey at each transect and site (flowering plants only).

Appendix B2: Functional traits of all insect species, including species name, family name, proboscis length (mm), proboscis size class (short, medium, long), proboscis literature reference, body length (mm), body length size class (small, medium, large), and body length literature reference.

Appendix F1: (A) Results of Kruskal-Wallis tests testing for significant differences between species indices (species strength, partner diversity, specialisation d') of the species within the management type and (B) results of Wilcoxon rank sum tests with the Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple testing for pair-wise p-values of differences between species.

Funding provided by: Helmholtz Recruitment Initiative of the Helmholtz Association*
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number:

Funding provided by: Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung Halle-Jena-Leipzig
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100020056
Award Number: DFG– FZT 118

Funding provided by: Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung Halle-Jena-Leipzig
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100020056
Award Number: 202548816

Files

AppendixB2.csv

Files (381.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:df5de70bafe5603a7764d23d47a1c236
37.9 kB Preview Download
md5:d92404638178cf41dbb1c38a94caf2cd
756 Bytes Preview Download
md5:5e5e548bb699a75c96a4f26e2d9f9502
222.2 kB Preview Download
md5:ffdcb665bdb1cefcaaf9d788a8349028
57.5 kB Preview Download
md5:37cf229ea13d8012baa1311914bf8e70
63.2 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works