Published December 31, 2015 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Onychatrium entale Nordenstam 1946, comb. nov.

Description

Onychatrium entale (Nordenstam, 1946) comb. nov.

(Figure 1)

Stenetrium entale Nordenstam, 1946: 26, figs 25–27.— Wolff 1962: 249. Hansenium entale.— Serov & Wilson, 1995: 81.

Material examined. Holotype: ♂ (3.8 mm), Tapateuen (=Tabiteue Island), Kiribati (SMNH 798).

Description. Cephalon length 0.6 width; antennal spines acute; lateral spines subequal in length to antennal spines; lateral spines acute, short, not extending distally as far as antennal spines; space between lateral and antennal spines mesially oblique; lateral margins straight or weakly convex. Eyes pale brown (faded in specimen), arranged in two parallel rows. Pleotelson length 1.0 width.

Antennula article 1 length 1.7 width; article 2 length 1.2 width; article 3 length 2 width; article 4 length 0.5 width.

Maxilliped basis length 2.1 maximum width; endite distal margin with 5 fan setae, distomesial corner with 1 triangular RS; epipod length 3.1 width, width 1.1 basis width, distomesial margin with 5 regularly-spaced setae, lateral margin sinuate.

Pereopod 1 ischium length 1.3 width; inferodistal margin with 1 seta, mesial distal margin with submarginal row of long setae; superodistal margin produced, with 4 long setae, apex narrowly rounded.

Pereopod 1 merus length 0.7 width, 0.9 carpus length, 0.8 ischium length; inferior margin without setae; inferior submargin with a dense patch of long setae; superodistal margin not produced, densely setose with long setae; inferodistal meral process moderately long, extending distally approx. half way along carpal blade, length 1.6 merus length, inferior margin length 0.9 merus length, narrowly lanceolate, apex acute.

Pereopod 1 carpus sub-triangular; length 1.3 width, 0.9 ischium length; inferior margin not clearly defined, colinear with inferior process margin. Carpal process length 1.4 width, 1.1 carpal width; sub-triangular, extending distally more than half length of propodus; apex acute, not setose; inferior margin straight, densely setose along distal two-thirds, distal to meral process, with 1 row of straight setae, 1–2 rows of long distally angled setae; distal margin slightly concave, sparsely setose.

Pereopod 1 propodus robust superiorly; length 1.3 maximum width, 2.1 proximal width, 1.6 ischium length; inferior margin clearly defined, long, 0.5 propodus length, 0.3 superior margin length, with submarginal row of long setae; superior margin with mesial row of evenly-spaced setae, and submarginal lateral row of long setae. Propodal palm width 0.4 maximum propodus width; transverse; toothed lobe with 5 teeth, largest tooth 7.6 length of smallest tooth. Palm process length 3.1 width, RS at apex; inferior margin convex, setose, along distal half only; superior margin weakly convex. Dactylus weakly curved; length 6.8 basal width, 3.8 propodal palm width, 1.4 propodus length; superior margin distal third densely setose; inferior margin with 18 regularly-spaced robust setulated setae; mesial surface not setose.

Pleopod 3 endopod apex with 4 plumose setae. Pleopod 4 exopod apex with 8 plumose setae.

Remarks. The holotype of O. entale was examined and available appendages drawn. This species is similar to Onychatrium forceps sp. nov., but there are several points of distinction. These differences are (state in O. forceps sp. nov. in parentheses): lateral head spine short, not extending anteriorly to level of antennal spine (long, extending anteriorly to level of antennal spine); space between lateral and antennal spine mesially oblique (evenly rounded); lateral margin of head straight or very weakly convex (manifestly convex); maxilliped exopod with evenly convex lateral margin (lateral margin distally concave); pereopod 1 carpal blade acute, with a broad base (carpal blade more slender); meral lobe long, acute (meral lobe short, blunt).

The lateral and antennal head spines present a consistent appearance in O. forceps sp. nov., as well as for other congeneric species for which there are multiple specimens, and these differences are considered to be of specieslevel significance.

Distribution. Known only from the type locality, Tapateuen, Kiribati, central Pacific.

Notes

Published as part of Bruce, Niel L. & Cumming, R. L., 2015, A new genus of Stenetriidae Hansen, 1905 (Asellota: Isopoda: Crustacea) from the Great Barrier Reef, Australia and the southwestern Pacific, pp. 485-508 in Zootaxa 3941 (4) on page 489, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3941.4.2, http://zenodo.org/record/243212

Files

Files (4.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:76bb93ecc01fe1239d3e151d71b10bf0
4.9 kB Download

System files (14.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:cfa6737b2caf08ab269b2597cf8545e3
14.7 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Scientific name authorship
Nordenstam
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
Arthropoda
Order
Isopoda
Family
Stenetriidae
Genus
Onychatrium
Species
entale
Taxon rank
species
Taxonomic status
comb. nov.
Taxonomic concept label
Onychatrium entale (Nordenstam, 1946) sec. Bruce & Cumming, 2015

References

  • Nordenstam, A. (1946) Marine Isopoda from Professor Dr. Sixten Bock's Expedition 1917 - 1918. Arkiv for Zoologi, 37 A (7), 1 - 31.
  • Wolff, T. (1962) The systematics and biology of bathyal and abyssal Isopoda Asellota. Galathea Report, 6, 1 - 320.
  • Serov, P. A. & Wilson, G. D. F. (1995) A review of the Stenetriidae (Crustacea: Isopoda: Asellota). Records of the Australian Museum, 47, 39 - 82. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.3853 / j. 0067 - 1975.47.1995.2