Published October 12, 2021 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Penicillicaris, gen. nov.

  • 1. Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW 7 5 BD, U. K.
  • 2. College of Marine Life Science, Ocean University of China, 5 Yushan Road, Qingdao 266003, China.

Description

Penicillicaris gen. nov.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 4F1EBA1D-4DA5-4B08-B561-455664FC3C86

Ever since the discovery and description of Thalestris pectinimana Car, 1884, the presence of penicillate elements on the antennary endopod and the distal exopodal and endopodal segments of P 1 in various related forms (Scott 1894a; Brian 1921; Monard 1928; Willey 1935; Sewell 1940; Bodin 1964; Vervoort 1964) has been uncritically accepted as part of the documented variability allegedly displayed by Parastenhelia spinosa (Lang 1948 and others) and unfortunately did not receive the attention it deserved. Sewell (1940) for example, claimed that Monard’s (1928) penicillate form from Banyuls-sur-Mer referred to Parastenhelia littoralis while his own material from Bermuda listed under the latter name cannot possibly be conspecific with the species described by Sars (1911). A new genus, Penicillicaris gen. nov., is proposed here to accommodate four forms that had previously been subsumed in the Parastenhelia spinosa complex and are attributed full species rank.Another three forms are placed with reservations in the genus as species inquirendae: Microthalestris forficula (Claus, 1863) sensu Scott (1894a), M. littoralis Sars, 1911 sensu Brian (1921) and M. littoralis Sars, 1911 f. scotti sensu Sewell (1940).

A number of records refer to the penicillate form but are not accompanied by illustrations. Such indeterminable records include those from Visakhapatnam (formerly Waltair), Andhra Pradesh in India (Krishnaswamy 1957 – as Parastenhelia littoralis f. pencillata [sic]), Dalkey Island and The Muglins, Co. Dublin (Roe 1958) and Lough Hyne (Ine), Co. Cork (Roe 1960; Sloane et al. 1961) in Ireland (all P. spinosa f. penicillata), and Rovinj in Croatia (Zavodnik 1969 – as P. spinosa var. penicillata).

Diagnosis. Parastenheliidae. Sexual dimorphism in antennule, P3 endopod, P5–P6 and urosomal segmentation; occasionally in P4 endopod (Pe. penicillata sp. nov.). Body subcylindrical; condition of hyaline frills of cephalothorax and somites unconfirmed. Rostrum defined at base, reaching at most to halfway second segment of antennule; linguiform. Anal operculum semicircular, bordered with fine setules. Caudal ramus wider than long, without conspicuous spinular ornamentation; with at least six setae, setae IV–V typically inflated at base in ♀.

Antennule ♀ slender and typically 8-segmented (occasionally 9-segmented), with aesthetascs on segments 4 and 8 (or 9). Antennule ♂ haplocer and presumably 10-segmented; with geniculation between segments 6 and 7, and four segments distal to geniculation; segment 5 swollen and with aesthetasc; segmental homologies in ♂: I, II– VIII, IX – XII, XIII, XIV – XVIII, XIX – XX, XXI – XXII, XXIII, XXIV – XXV, XXVI – XXVIII. Antenna not sexually dimorphic; allobasis completely fused or partially divided, with endopodal pinnate seta on abexopodal margin; exopod 2-segmented, proximal segment with two setae, distal segment with 1–2 lateral and three apical elements; free endopod with two penicillate elements. Mandible with 2 elements on basis; endopod with two lateral and 3–4 apical setae; exopod 1-segmented, with two setae. Maxillulary coxal epipodite and maxilla unconfirmed. Maxilliped with 0–1 seta(e) on syncoxa; basis with one seta on palmar margin; endopod represented by claw with unconfirmed number of accessory setae.

P1 inner basal spine not sexually dimorphic. P1 exopod 3-segmented; exp-2 elongate and much longer than others, with inner seta; exp-3 with two penicillate spines, a geniculate seta or additional penicillate spine, and one non-geniculate seta. P1 endopod 2-segmented; enp-1 longer than exopod, with short, proximally inserted, pinnate inner seta, inner segment margin without area of reduced chitinization; enp-2 with one naked minute seta and two penicillate claws. P2–P4 rami typically 3-segmented, P2–P3 endopods ♀ occasionally 2-segmented (Pe. penicillata sp. nov.); inner seta of P2–P4 exp-1 reduced in size. P3 endopod ♂ 3-segmented; enp-3 with spinous apophysis and no inner setae. P4 endopod ♂ occasionally without inner setae on enp-3 [1.1.021; in Pe. penicillata sp. nov.]. Armature formula of P2–P4 as follows:

P 5 ♀ endopodal lobe with five setae; inner margin without series of transverse striae. P 5 ♀ exopod elongate, with six elements. P 5 ♂ endopodal lobe with two elements, outer one typically shortest; exopod 1-segmented, with seven elements. P6 unconfirmed in both sexes.

Etymology. The generic name is derived from the Latin penicillus, meaning paintbrush, and the Greek suffix -caris, meaning shrimp, and refers to the presence of penicillate spines on the antennary endopod and both rami of the first swimming leg. Gender: feminine.

Type species. Thalestris pectinimana Car, 1884 = Penicillicaris pectinimana (Car, 1884) comb. nov. (by original designation herein).

Other species. P. maldivensis sp. nov.; P. penicillata sp. nov.; P. sewelli sp. nov.

Species inquirendae. Microthalestris forficula sensu Scott (1894a); M. littoralis Sars, 1911 sensu Brian (1921); M. littoralis Sars, 1911 f. scotti sensu Sewell (1940).

Notes

Published as part of Huys, Rony & Mu, Fanghong, 2021, Johnwellsia, a new intertidal genus of Parastenheliidae (Copepoda, Harpacticoida) from the Taiwan Strait, China, including a review of the family and key to genera, pp. 236-318 in Zootaxa 5051 (1) on pages 297-298, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5051.1.13, http://zenodo.org/record/5572417

Files

Files (5.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:cf12d428260df860ee166f76015f74b0
5.9 kB Download

System files (33.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:c80e782b1e7ba7ae45fc2aafb3cadf7c
33.7 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

References

  • Car, L. (1884) Ein Beitrag zur Copepoden-Fauna des adriatischen Meeres. Archiv fur Naturgeschichte, 50, 237 - 256, pls. XVII - XVIII.
  • Scott, T. (1894 a) Report on Entomostraca from the Gulf of Guinea, collected by John Rattray, B. Sc. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology, Series 2, 6, 1 - 161, pls. I - XV. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1096 - 3642.1894. tb 00660. x
  • Brian, A. (1921) I Copepodi Harpacticoidi del Golfo di Genova. Stabilimento Tipografico-Litografico, R. Istituto Sordomuti, Genova, 112 pp. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 59332
  • Monard, A. (1928) Les Harpacticoides marins de Banyuls. Archives de Zoologie experimentale et generale, 67, 259 - 443.
  • Willey, A. (1935) Harpacticoid Copepoda from Bermuda. Part II. Annals and Magazine of natural History, Series 10, 15, 50 - 100. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 00222933508654944
  • Sewell, R. B. S. (1940) Copepoda, Harpacticoida. The John Murray Expedition 1933 - 1934 Scientific Reports, 7 (2), 117 - 382.
  • Bodin, P. (1964) Recherches sur la systematique et la distribution des Copepodes Harpacticoides des substrats meubles des environs de Marseille. Recueil des Travaux de la Station marine d'Endoume, Faculte des Sciences de Marseille, 51 (= Bulletin 35), 107 - 183.
  • Vervoort, W. (1964) Freeliving Copepoda from Ifaluk Atoll in the Caroline Islands with notes on related species. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 236, i - ix + 1 - 431. https: // doi. org / 10.5479 / si. 03629236.236.1
  • Lang, K. (1948) Monographie der Harpacticiden. Vols. 1 - 2. Hakan Ohlsson, Lund, 1682 pp.
  • Sars, G. O. (1911) Copepoda Harpacticoida. Parts XXXI & XXXII. Supplement (continued). An Account of the Crustacea of Norway, with short Descriptions and Figures of all the Species, 5, 369 - 396, supplement pls. 11 - 26.
  • Claus, C. (1863) Die freilebenden Copepoden mit besonderer Berucksichtigung der Fauna Deutschlands, der Nordsee und des Mittelmeeres. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, 230 pp., XXXVII pls. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 58676
  • Krishnaswamy, S. (1957) Studies on the Copepoda of Madras. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Madras, Chennai, 168 pp.
  • Roe, K. M. (1958) The littoral harpacticids of the Dalkey (Co. Dublin) area with descriptions of six new species. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, (B), 59, 221 - 255.
  • Roe, K. M. (1960) Some harpacticids from Lough Ine, with descriptions of two new species. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, (B), 60, 277 - 289.
  • Sloane, J. F., Bassindale, R., Davenport, E., Ebling, F. J. & Kitching, J. A. (1961) The ecology of Lough Ine. IX. The flora and fauna associated with undergrowth forming algae in the Rapids area. Journal of Ecology, 49, 353 - 368. https: // doi. org / 10.2307 / 2257268
  • Zavodnik, D. (1969) La communaute a Acetabularia mediterranea Lamour dans l'Adriatique du Nord. Internationale Revue der gesamten Hydrobiologie, 54, 543 - 551. https: // doi. org / 10.1002 / iroh. 19690540406