Published June 30, 2017 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Enicospilus antefurcalis

Authors/Creators

Description

Key to species of the Enicospilus antefurcalis species-group

1 Central sclerite completely absent. Oceanic........... E. kalveus Gauld & Mitchell, 1981

– Central sclerite present (Fig. 5)...................................................................................... 2

2 Proximal corner adjacent to Rs+2r of marginal cell with wide glabrous area. Central sclerite elongate linear-oval. Eastern Palaearctic and Oriental....................................................................................................................................... E. sauteri (Enderlein, 1921)

– Proximal corner of marginal cell entirely setose, without glabrous area. Central sclerite various, oval to circular (Fig. 5)..................................................................................... 3

3 Proximal and distal sclerites separated, not confluent.................................................... 4

– Proximal and distal sclerites confluent (Fig. 5)............................................................ 10

4 Lower face 0.9 times as wide as high. Clypeus wide and 1.9 times as wide as high. AI = 0.3. Australasian............................................... E. ypsilon Gauld & Mitchell, 1981

– Lower face 0.7–0.8 times as wide as high. Clypeus normal and 1.5–1.8 times as wide as high. AI = 0.4–0.5........................................................................................................... 5

5 ICI = 0.8. Distal sclerite weak. Fenestra rather small. Australasian.................................................................................................................... E. xuthus Gauld & Mitchell, 1981

– ICI = 0.4–0.6. Distal sclerite strong. Fenestra moderately large.................................... 6

6 Central sclerite large, about 40% as wide as proximal sclerite and its minimum diameter larger than minimum distance between it and Rs+2r. Afrotropical and Oriental........... 7

– Central sclerite of moderate size, less than 20% as wide as proximal sclerite and its minimum diameter smaller than minimum distance between it and Rs+2r....................... 8

7 Central sclerite weakly sclerotized and pigmented. Upper tooth of mandible 2.1–2.3 times as long as lower tooth....................................... E. aciculatus (Taschenberg, 1875)

– Central sclerite moderately to strongly sclerotized and strongly pigmented. Upper tooth of mandible 1.3–1.4 times as long as lower tooth.......... E. laqueatus (Enderlein, 1921)

8 Posterior part of metasoma black. Distal 0.8 of outer surface of fore tibia with moderately dense spines. Afrotropical................................................... E. watshami Gauld, 1982

– Posterior part of metasoma not black. Distal half of outer surface of fore tibia with sparse spines.............................................................................................................................. 9

9 Central sclerite oval, its longer axis parallel to Rs+2r. Face yellowish-white except for central area. Mandibles with sparse setae. Afrotropical............ E. polemus Gauld, 1982

– Central sclerite oval to suboval, its longer axis at right angle to Rs+2r. Face entirely orange-yellow. Mandibles with dense setae. Afrotropical and Oceanic................................................................................................................ E. ruscus Gauld & Mitchell, 1978

10 Central sclerite positioned in middle of fenestra. Corner formed by distal margin of proximal screrite and proximal part of distal sclerite, more or less angulate. Australasian..................................................................................... E. xaivus Gauld & Mitchell, 1981

– Central sclerite positioned in distal part of fenestra (Fig. 5). Corner formed by distal margin of proximal sclerite and proximal part of distal sclerite, evenly curved (Fig. 5)....................................................................................................................................... 11

11 Mesosoma, coxae, T1, T2, T5–8 dark-brown to black (Fig. 5). Metapleuron roughly punctostriate (Fig. 6). Eastern Palaearctic........................................ E. kikuchii sp. nov.

– Body entirely yellowish-brown or posterior part of metasoma blackish. Metapleuron uniformly punctate or finely punctostriate........................................................................ 12

12 AI = 0.2–0.3, CI = 0.2–0.3. Distal sclerite weak. Central sclerite oval and large, its longer axis reclivous and parallel to M between 2m-cu and 3rs-m. Oriental.................................................................................................................... E. marathwadensis Nikam, 1980

– AI = 0.3–1.1, CI = 0.3–0.6. Distal sclerite more or less strong. Central sclerite circular to oval, if oval more or less small and its longer axis inclivous, not parallel to M between 2m-cu and 3rs-m........................................................................................................... 13

13 Mandible twisted 10–20°. Metapleuron punctostriate or punctate. Posterior part of metasoma usually black. Australasian, Eastern Palaearctic, Oceanic, and Oriental...................................................................................................... E. melanocarpus Cameron, 1905

– Mandible twisted 25°. Metapleuron closely punctate. Posterior part of metasoma black or yellowish brown. Afrotropical................................................................................. 14

14 Posterior part of metasoma black. Central sclerite small, its maximum diameter smaller than minimum distance between it and Rs+2r. AI = 0.5–1.0...................................................................................................................................... E. bicoloratus Cameron, 1912

– Posterior part of metasoma yellowish-brown. Central sclerite moderately large, its maximum diameter larger than minimum distance between it and Rs+2r. AI = 0.3–0.5............................................................................................... E. antefurcalis (Szépligeti, 1908)

Notes

Published as part of Shimizu, So, 2017, Description of a new species and revised key to species of the Enicospilus antefurcalis species-group from Japan (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Ophioninae), pp. 183-194 in Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 57 (1) on pages 191-192, DOI: 10.1515/aemnp-2017-0067, http://zenodo.org/record/5316015

Files

Files (7.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:fd2475250ed897b4df18f5afd50cf515
7.1 kB Download

System files (25.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:6c70008ca74d0e7c24871d42df51278a
25.7 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Scientific name authorship
Szepligeti
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
Arthropoda
Order
Hymenoptera
Family
Ichneumonidae
Genus
Enicospilus
Species
antefurcalis
Taxon rank
species
Taxonomic concept label
Enicospilus antefurcalis (Szepligeti, 1908) sec. Shimizu, 2017

References

  • GAULD I. D. & MITCHELL P. A. 1981: The taxonomy, distribution and host preferences of Indo-Papuan parasitic wasps of the subfamily Ophioninae. CAB: Slough. Commonwealth Institute of Entomology, London, 611 pp.
  • GAULD I. D. 1982: A revised key to the Enicospilus antefurcalis (Szepligeti) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) species-group of the Afrotropical region. Bulletin of Entomological Research 72: 33 - 38.