Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published February 29, 2008 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Phylogeny of the pollinating yucca moths, with revision of Mexican species (Tegeticula and Parategeticula; Lepidoptera, Prodoxidae)

Description

Pellmyr, Olle, Balcázar-Lara, Manuel, Segraves, Kari A., Althoff, David M., Littlefield, Rik J. (2008): Phylogeny of the pollinating yucca moths, with revision of Mexican species (Tegeticula and Parategeticula; Lepidoptera, Prodoxidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 152 (2): 297-314, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2007.00361.x, URL: https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article-lookup/doi/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2007.00361.x

Files

source.pdf

Files (732.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:0e19c384f9a267883b893cd99d7bd1c0
732.8 kB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

URL
https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/4370
LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:0E19FF84FFA2FF88FF89FFD99D7BFFC0
URL
http://publication.plazi.org/id/0E19FF84FFA2FF88FF89FFD99D7BFFC0

Cites
Publication: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1405 (DOI)
Has part
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.5492616 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/F22087FCFFA5FF80FC19FEBB9FB9FEB5 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.5492618 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/F22087FCFFAAFF80FF11F92D9932F916 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.5492620 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/F22087FCFFABFF81FF48F92D99F3F9AD (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.5492622 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/F22087FCFFA8FF82FF33FA39983DFB62 (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5447121 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5447123 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5447125 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5447127 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5447129 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5447131 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5447133 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5447135 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5447137 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5447139 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5447141 (DOI)
Is source of
Dataset: https://www.gbif.org/dataset/aef15b08-7736-4074-afe2-0cf41281fd91 (URL)

References

  • Althoff DM, Segraves KA, Leebens-Mack J, Pellmyr O. 2006. Patterns of speciation in the yucca moths: parallel species radiations within the Tegeticula yuccasella species complex. Systematic Biology 55: 398-410.
  • Althoff DM, Svensson GP, Pellmyr O. 2007. The influence of interaction type and feeding location on the phylogeographic structure of the yucca moth community associated with Hesperoyucca whipplei. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 43: 398-406.
  • Baker HG. 1986. Yuccas and yucca moths - a historical commentary. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 73: 556-564.
  • Bastida L. 1962. Una nueva especie de Tegeticula (Tegeticula mexicana n. sp.) Lepidoptera: Prodoxidae). Anales del Instituto de Biologia (Universidad de Mexico) 33: 259- 272.
  • Bogler DJ, Neff JL, Simpson BB. 1995. Multiple origins of the yucca-yucca moth association. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92: 6864-6867.
  • Buckley TR, Simon C, Chambers GK. 2001. Exploring among-site rate variation models in a maximum likelihood framework using empirical data: effects of model assumptions on estimates of topology, branch lengths, and bootstrap support. Systematic Biology 50: 67-86.
  • Clary KH. 1997. Phylogeny, character evolution, and biogeography of Yucca L. (Agavaceae) as inferred from plant morphology and sequences of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the nuclear ribosomal DNA. PhD Dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
  • Clary DO, Wolstenholme DR. 1985. The mitochondrial DNA molecule of Drosophila yakuba: nucleotide sequence, gene organization, and genetic code. Journal of Molecular Evolution 22: 252-271.
  • Crabb BA, Pellmyr O. 2004. Defection by plants in the yucca-yucca moth association: a test of the cheater plant hypothesis for Yucca treculeana. Oikos 107: 321-328.
  • Davis DR. 1967. A revision of the moths of the subfamily Prodoxinae (Lepidoptera: Incurvariidae). United States Natural History Museum, Bulletin 255: 1-170.
  • Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
  • Frack DC. 1982. A systematic study of prodoxine moths (Adelidae: Prodoxinae) and their hosts (Agavaceae), with descriptions of the subfamilies of Adelidae (s. lat.). MSc Thesis, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona.
  • Holland JN, Fleming TH. 1999. Mutualistic interactions between Upiga virescens (Pyralidae), a pollinating seedconsumer, and Lophocereus schottii (Cactaceae). Ecology 80: 2074-2084.
  • Kawakita A, Takimura A, Terachi T, Sota T, Kato M. 2004. Cospeciation analysis of an obligate pollination mutualism: have Glochidion trees (Euphorbiaceae) and pollinating Epicephala moths (Gracillariidae) diversified in parallel? Evolution 58: 2201-2214.
  • Machado CA, Robbins N, Gilbert MPT, Herre EA. 2005. Critical review of host specificity and its coevolutionary implications in the fig/fig-wasp mutualism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102 (Suppl. 1): 6558-6565.
  • Matuda E, Pina Lujan I. 1980. Las plantas mexicanas del genero Yucca. Mexico: Toluca.
  • Miles NJ. 1983. Variation in host specificity in the yucca moth, Tegeticula yuccasella (Incurvariidae): a morphometric approach. Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 37: 207-216.
  • Minin V, Abdo Z, Joyce P, Sullivan J. 2003. Performancebased selection of likelihood models for phylogeny estimation. Systematic Biology 52: 674-683.
  • Pellmyr O. 1999. A systematic revision of the yucca moths in the Tegeticula yuccasella complex north of Mexico. Systematic Entomology 24: 243-271.
  • Pellmyr O. 2003. Yuccas, yucca moths and coevolution: a review. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 90: 35-55.
  • Pellmyr O, Balcazar-Lara M. 2000. Systematics of the yucca moth genus Parategeticula (Lepidoptera: Prodoxidae), with description of three Mexican species. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 93: 432-439.
  • Pellmyr O, Balcazar-Lara M, Althoff DM, Segraves KA, Leebens-Mack J. 2006. Phylogeny and life history evolution of Prodoxus yucca moths (Lepidoptera: Prodoxidae). Systematic Entomology 31: 1-20.
  • Pellmyr O, Huth CJ. 1994. Evolutionary stability of mutualism between yuccas and yucca moths. Nature 372: 257-260.
  • Pellmyr O, Krenn HW. 2002. Origin of a complex key innovation in an obligate insect-plant mutualism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United State of America 99: 5498-5502.
  • Pellmyr O, Leebens-Mack J. 1999. Forty million years of mutualism: evidence for Eocene origin of the yucca-yucca moth association. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96: 9178-9183.
  • Pellmyr O, Leebens-Mack J, Huth CJ. 1996. Nonmutualistic yucca moths and their evolutionary consequences. Nature 380: 155-156.
  • Pellmyr O, Segraves KA, Althoff DM, Balcazar-Lara M, Leebens-Mack J. 2007. The phylogeny of yuccas. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 43: 493-501.
  • Powell JA. 1984. Biological interrelationships of moths and Yucca schottii. University of California Publications in Entomology 100: 1-93.
  • Powell JA. 1992. Interrelationships of yuccas and yucca moths. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 7: 10-15.
  • Powell JA, Mackie RA. 1966. Biological interrelationships of moths and Yucca whipplei (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae, Blastobasidae, Prodoxidae). University of California Publications in Entomology 42: 1-59.
  • Raven PH, Axelrod DA. 1978. Origin and relationships of the California flora. University of California Publications in Botany, 72.
  • Riley CV. 1872a. The fertilization of the yucca plant by Pronuba yuccasella. Canadian Entomologist 4: 182.
  • Riley CV. 1872b. Insects shaped by the needs of flowers. Nature 6: 444.
  • Riley CV. 1892. The yucca moths and Yucca pollination. 3rd Annual Report, Missouri Botanical Garden 3: 99-158.
  • Segraves K, Pellmyr O. 2001. Phylogeography of the yucca moth Tegeticula maculata: the role of historical biogeography in reconciling high genetic structure with limited speciation. Molecular Ecology 10: 1247-1253.
  • Segraves KA. 2003. Understanding stability in mutualisms: can extrinsic factors balance the yucca-yucca moth interaction. Ecology 84: 2943-2951.
  • Segraves KA, Althoff DM, Pellmyr O. 2005. Limiting cheaters in a mutualism: evidence from hybridization between mutualist and cheater moths. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 272: 2195-2001.
  • Segraves KA, Pellmyr O. 2004. Testing the 'Out of Florida' hypothesis on the origin of cheating in the yucca-yucca moth mutualism. Evolution 58: 2266-2279.
  • Smith CI, Pellmyr O, Althoff DM, Leebens-Mack J, Segraves KA. 2007. Pattern and timing of diversification in Yucca (Agavaceae): specialized pollination does not escalate rates of diversification. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B: Biological Sciences. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1405
  • Sullivan J. 2005. Maximum-likelihood estimation of phlyogeny from DNA sequence data. Methods in Enzymology 395: 757-778.
  • Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods), Version 4. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
  • Villavicencio MA, Perez-Escandon BE. 1995. Tipos de fruto de Yucca filifera y formas asociadas de Tegeticula yuccasella (Lepidoptera). Boletin de la Sociedad Botanica de Mexico 57: 121-123.
  • Weiblen GD. 2002. How to be a fig wasp. Annual Review of Entomology 47: 299-330.