Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published July 31, 2006 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Molecular phylogeny and systematics of the Pieridae (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea): higher classification and biogeography

Description

Braby, Michael F., Vila, Roger, Pierce, Naomi E. (2006): Molecular phylogeny and systematics of the Pieridae (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea): higher classification and biogeography. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 147 (3): 239-275, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2006.00264.x, URL: https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article-lookup/doi/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2006.00264.x

Files

source.pdf

Files (606.6 kB)

Name Size
md5:744814723986096d91bd7cc3b3593934
606.6 kB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:74481472FF86096DFFBDFFC3B3593934
URL
http://publication.plazi.org/id/74481472FF86096DFFBDFFC3B3593934

Related works

Has part
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/88716C0AFF80096BFF33FE7DB54C3F5C (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5426877 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5426879 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5426881 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5426883 (DOI)

References

  • Ackery PR. 1975. A new pierine genus and species with notes on the genus Tatochila (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Bulletin of the Allyn Museum 30: 1-9.
  • Ackery PR. 1984. Systematics and faunistic studies on butterflies. In: Vane-Wright RI, Ackery PR, eds. The biology of butterflies. Symposium of the Royal Entomological Society of London, No. 11. London: Academic Press, 11-21.
  • Ackery PR, de Jong R, Vane-Wright RI. 1999. The butterflies: Hedyloidea, Hesperioidea and Papilionoidea. In: Kristensen NP, ed. Lepidoptera, moths and butterflies, Vol. 1. Evolution, systematics and biogeography. Berlin: de Gruyter, 263-300.
  • Ackery PR, Smith CR, Vane-Wright RI. 1995. Carcasson's African butterflies. An annotated catalogue of the Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea of the Afrotropical Region. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing.
  • Ackery PR, Vane-Wright RI. 1984. Milkweed butterflies: their cladistics and biology. London: British Museum (Natural History).
  • Arbogast BS, Edwards SV, Wakeley J, Beerli P, Slowinski JB. 2002. Estimating divergence times from molecular data on phylogenetic and population genetic timescales. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 707-740.
  • Aurivillius C. 1910. Pieridae. In: Seitz A, ed. Macrolepidoptera of the world, Vol. 13. Stuttgart: Alfred Kernen, 29- 69.
  • Bernardi G. 1954. Revision des Pierinae de la faune Malgache (Lepid. Pieridae). Memoires de l'Institut Scientifique de Madagascar Serie E Entomologie 5: 239-375.
  • Braby MF. 2005. Provisional checklist of genera of the Pieridae (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Zootaxa 832: 1-16.
  • Braby MF, Pierce NE. 2006. Systematics, biogeography and diversification of the Indo-Australian genus Delias Hubner (Lepidoptera: Pieridae): phylogenetic evidence supports an 'out-of-Australia' origin. Systematic Entomology (in press).
  • Braby MF, Pierce NE, Vila R. 2006. Phylogeny and historical biogeography of the subtribe Aporiina (Lepidoptera: Pieridae): implications for the origin of Australian butterflies. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society (in press).
  • Braby MF, Trueman JWH. 2006. Evolution of larval host plant associations and adaptive radiation in pierid butterflies. Journal of Evolutionary Biology (in press).
  • Braby MF, Trueman JWH, Eastwood RG. 2005. When and where did troidine butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) evolve? Phylogenetic and biogeographic evidence suggests an origin in remnant Gondwanan in the Late Cretaceous. Invertebrate Systematics 19: 113-143.
  • Bremer K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795- 803.
  • Bremer K. 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10: 295-304.
  • Bridges CA. 1988. Catalogue of Papilionidae and Pieridae (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera). Urbana, Illinois: Charles A. Bridges.
  • Brower AVZ. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships among the Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera) inferred from partial sequences of the wingless gene. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 267: 1201-1211.
  • Brower AVZ, DeSalle R. 1998. Patterns of mitochondrial versus nuclear DNA sequence divergence among nymphalid butterflies: the utility of wingless as a source of characters for phylogenetic inference. Insect Molecular Biology 7: 73- 82.
  • Brower AVZ, Egan MG. 1997. Cladistic analysis of Heliconius butterflies and relatives (Nymphalidae: Heliconiiti): a revised phylogenetic position for Eueides based on sequences from mtDNA and nuclear gene. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 264: 969-977.
  • Brown FM. 1976. Oligodonta florissantensis, gen. n., sp. nov. (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Bulletin of the Allyn Museum 37: 1- 4.
  • Brunton CFA. 1998. The evolution of ultraviolet patterns in European Colias butterflies (Lepidoptera, Pieridae): a phylogeny using mitochondrial DNA. Heredity 80: 611-616.
  • Brunton CFA, Hurst GDD. 1998. Mitochondrial DNA phylogeny of brimstone butterflies (genus Gonepteryx) from the Canary Islands and Madeira. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 63: 69-79.
  • Butler AG. 1870. A revision of the genera of the subfamily Pierinae. Cistula Entomologica 1: 33-58.
  • Campbell DL, Brower AVZ, Pierce NE. 2000. Molecular evolution of the Wingless gene and its implications for the phylogenetic placement of the butterfly family Riodinidae (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea). Molecular Biology and Evolution 17: 684-696.
  • Carpenter FM. 1992. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology, Part R. Arthropoda 4, Vol. 4: Superclass Hexapoda. Boulder/ Lawrence: Geological Society of America and University of Kansas.
  • Caterino MS, Cho S, Sperling FAH. 2000. The current state of insect molecular systematics: a thriving tower of babel. Annual Review of Entomology 45: 1-54.
  • Caterino MS, Reed RD, Kuo MM, Sperling FAH. 2001. A partitioned likelihood analysis of swallowtail butterfly phylogeny (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Systematic Biology 50: 106-127.
  • Chapman TA. 1895. Notes on butterfly pupae, with some remarks on the phylogenesis of the Rhopalocera. Entomologist's Record and Journal of Variation 6: 101-107, 125-131, 147-152.
  • Cheong SW. 1990. Comparative morphology and phylogeny on the female internal genitalia of the Pieridae (Lepidoptera). Taegu: Department of Biology, Kyungpook National University, 80.
  • Cho S, Mitchell A, Regier JC, Mitter C, Poole RW, Friedlander TP, Zhao S. 1995. A highly conserved nuclear gene for low-level phylogenetics: elongation factor-1α recovers morphology-based tree for heliothine moths. Molecular Biology and Evolution 12: 650-656.
  • Clary DO, Wolstenholme DR. 1985. The mitochondrial DNA molecule of Drosophila yakuba: nucleotide sequence, gene organization, and genetic code. Journal of Molecular Evolution 22: 252-271.
  • Clench HK. 1955. Revised classification of the butterfly family Lycaenidae and its allies. Annals of the Carnegie Museum 33: 261-274.
  • Cooper A, Penny D. 1997. Mass survival of birds across the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary: molecular evidence. Science 275: 1109-1113.
  • Corbet AS, Pendlebury HM. 1978. The butterflies of the Malay Peninsula. Kuala Lumpur: Malayan Nature Society.
  • Corbet AS, Pendlebury HM. 1992. The butterflies of the Malay Peninsula. Kuala Lumpur: Malayan Nature Society.
  • Courtney SP. 1986. The ecology of pierid butterflies: dynamics and interactions. Advances in Ecological Research 15: 51-131.
  • Cox CB, Moore PD. 2000. Biogeography: an ecological and evolutionary approach. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
  • Crisp MD, Cook LG, Steane D. 2004. Radiation of the Australian flora: what can comparisons of molecular phylogenies across multiple taxa tell us about the evolution of diversity in present-day communities? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 359: 1551-1571.
  • D'Abrera B. 1971. Butterflies of the Australian region. Melbourne: Lansdowne Press.
  • D'Abrera B. 1980. Butterflies of the Afrotropical region. East Melbourne: Lansdowne Editions.
  • D'Abrera B. 1981. Butterflies of the Neotropical region, Part 1: Papilionidae and Pieridae. Melbourne: Lansdowne Editions.
  • D'Abrera B. 1982. Butterflies of the Oriental region, Part I: Papilionidae, Pieridae and Danaidae. Ferny Creek, Victoria: Hill House.
  • D'Abrera B. 1990. Butterflies of the Holarctic region, Part 1: Papilionidae, Pieridae, Danaidae and Satyridae (Partim). Black Rock, Melbourne: Hill House.
  • Danforth BN, Shuqing J. 1998. Elongation factor-1α occurs as two copies in bees: implications for phylogenetic analysis of EF-1α sequences in insects. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15: 225-235.
  • Dixey FA. 1894. On the phylogeny of the Pierinae, as illustrated by their wing-markings and geographical distribution. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London Part 2: 249-334.
  • Dixey FA. 1932. The plume-scales of the Pierinae. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 80: 57-75.
  • Ehrlich PR. 1958. The comparative morphology, phylogeny and higher classification of the butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea). University of Kansas Science Bulletin 39: 305-364.
  • Ehrlich PR, Ehrlich AH. 1967. The phenetic relationships of the butterflies. I. Adult taxonomy and the nonspecificity hypothesis. Systematic Zoology 16: 301-317.
  • Emmel TC, Minno MC, Drummond BA. 1992. Florissant butterflies. A guide to the fossil and present-day species of central Colorado. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Evanoff E, McIntosh WC, Murphey PC. 2001. Stratigraphic summary and 40Ar/39Ar geochronology of the Florissant Formation, Colorado. In: Evanoff E, Gregory- Wodzicki KM, Johnson KR, eds. Fossil flora and stratigraphy of the Florissant Formation, Colorado. Denver, Colorado: Denver Museum of Nature and Science, series 4, 1-16.
  • Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the boot strap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
  • Felsenstein J. 1988. Phylogenies from molecular sequences: inference and reliability. Annual Review of Genetics 22: 521- 565.
  • Field WD. 1958. A redefinition of the butterfly genera Tatochila, Phulia, Piercolias, and Baltia, with descriptions of related genera and subgenera. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 108: 103-131.
  • Field WD, Herrera JV. 1977. The pierid butterflies of the genera Hypsochila Ureta, Phulia Herrich-Schaffer, Infraphulia Field, Pierphulia Field, and Piercolias Staudinger. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 232: 1-64.
  • Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3: 294-299.
  • Freitas AVL, Brown KSJ. 2004. Phylogeny of the Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera). Systematic Biology 53: 363-383.
  • Friedlander TP, Horst KR, Regier JC, Mitter C, Peigler RS, Fang QQ. 1998. Two nuclear genes yield concordant relationships within Attacini (Lepidoptera: Saturnidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9: 131-140.
  • Geiger HJ. 1981. Enzyme electrophoretic studies on the genetic relationships of pierid butterflies (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) I. European taxa. Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 19: 181-195.
  • Giribet G. 2003. Stability in phylogenetic formulations and its relationship to nodal support. Systematic Biology 52: 554- 564.
  • Grote AR. 1900. The descent of the pierids. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 39: 4-67.
  • Guindon S, Gascuel O. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Systematic Biology 52: 696-704.
  • Harvey DJ. 1987. The higher classification of the Riodinidae. PhD Thesis, University of Texas, Austin.
  • Hedges SB, Kumar S. 2003. Genomic clocks and evolutionary timescales. Trends in Genetics 19: 200-206.
  • Hillis DM, Mable BK, Larson A, Davis SK, Zimmer EA. 1996a. Nucleic acids IV. Sequencing and cloning. In: Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable BK, eds. Molecular systematics. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, 321-384.
  • Hillis DM, Mable BK, Moritz C. 1996b. Applications of molecular systematics: the state of the field and a look to the future. In: Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable BK, eds. Molecular systematics. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, 515-543.
  • Janz N, Nylin S. 1998. Butterflies and plants: a phylogenetic study. Evolution 52: 486-502.
  • de Jong R, Vane-Wright RI, Ackery PR. 1996. The higher classification of butterflies (Lepidoptera): problems and prospects. Entomologica Scandinavica 27: 65-101.
  • Kamie K, Taira H, Ooura H, Kakuta A, Matsumoto S, Ejiri S-i, Katsumata T. 1993. Nucleotide sequence of the cDNA encoding silk gland elongation factor 1α. Nucleic Acids Research 21: 742.
  • Kandul NP, Lukhtanov VA, Dantchenko AV, Coleman JWS, Sekercioglu CH, Haig D, Pierce NE. 2004. Phylogeny of Agrodiaetus Hubner 1822 (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) inferred from mtDNA sequences of COI and COII and nuclear sequences of EF-1α: karyotype diversification and species radiation. Systematic Biology 53: 278-298.
  • Kemp DJ, Rutowski RL, Mendoza M. 2005. Colour pattern evolution in butterflies: a phylogenetic analysis of structural ultraviolet and melanic markings in North American sulphurs. Evolutionary Ecology Research 7: 133- 141.
  • Klots AB. 1929. The generic status of Catopsilia Hubner and Phoebus Hubner, with a discussion of the relationships of the species and the homologies of the male genitalia (Lepidoptera, Pieridae). Bulletin of the Brooklyn Entomological Society 24: 203-214.
  • Klots AB. 1933. A generic classification of the Pieridae (Lepidoptera) together with a study of the male genitalia. Entomologica America 12: 139-242.
  • Knapp S, Lamas G, Lughadha EN, Novarino G. 2004. Stability or stasis in the names of organisms: the evolving codes of nomenclature. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 359: 611-622.
  • Kristensen NP. 1976. Remarks on the family-level phylogeny of butterflies (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera). Zeitschrift fur Zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung 14: 25- 33.
  • Kusnezov NJ. 1921. On 'taxonomic conceptions' and some attempts of their foundation on morphological data. Revue Russe d'Entomologie 17: 53-80.
  • Lamas G. 2004. Pieridae. In: Lamas G, ed. Checklist: Part 4a Hesperioidea-Papilionoidea. In: Heppner JB, ed. Atlas of Neotropical Lepidoptera, Vol. 5A. Gainesville: Association for Tropical Lepidoptera/Scientific Publishers, 99-117.
  • Lanave C, Preparata G, Saccone C, Serio G. 1984. A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates. Journal of Molecular Evolution 20: 86-93.
  • Lees DC, Kremen C, Raharitsimba T. 2003. Classification, diversity, and endemism of the butterflies (Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea): a revised species checklist. In: Goodman SM, Benstead JP, eds. The natural history of Madagascar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 762-793.
  • Lukhtanov VA. 1991. Evolution of the karyotype and system of higher taxa of the Pieridae (Lepidoptera) of the world fauna. Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 70: 619-641.
  • Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 1999. MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, Version 3.08a for Macintosh. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
  • Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 2001. MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, Version 4.03. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
  • Magallon SA. 2004. Dating lineages: molecular and paleontological approaches to the temporal framework of clades. International Journal of Plant Sciences 165: S7-S21.
  • Martin J-F, Gilles A, Descimon H. 2003. Species concepts and sibling species: the case of Leptidea sinapis and Leptidea reali (Lepidoptera). In: Boggs CL, Watt WB, Ehrlich PR, eds. Butterflies: ecology and evolution taking flight. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 459-476.
  • Miller JS. 1987. Phylogenetic studies in the Papilioninae. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 186: 365-512.
  • Mitchell A, Cho S, Regier JC, Mitter C, Poole RW, Matthews M. 1997. Phylogenetic utility of elongation factor-1α in Noctuoidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera): the limits of synonymous substitution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 381-390.
  • Mitchell A, Mitter C, Regier JC. 2000. More taxa or more characters revisited: combining data from nuclear proteinencoding genes for phylogenetic analysis of Noctuoidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera). Systematic Biology 49: 202-224.
  • Monteiro A, Pierce NE. 2001. Phylogeny of Bicyclus (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) inferred from COI, COII, and EF-1a gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 18: 264-281.
  • Morinaka S, Miyata T, Tanaka K. 2002. Molecular phylogeny of the Eichhorni group of Delias Hubner, 1819 (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 23: 276-287.
  • Mosher E. 1969. Lepidoptera pupae. Five collected works on the pupae of North American Lepidoptera. East Lansing: Entomological Reprint Specialists.
  • Palumbi SR. 1996. Nucleic acids II: the polymerase chain reaction. In: Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable BK, eds. Molecular systematics, 2nd edn. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, 205- 247.
  • Penz CM, Peggie D. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships among Heliconiinae genera based on morphology (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Systematic Entomology 28: 451-479.
  • Pollock DD, Watt WB, Rashbrook VK, Iyengar EV. 1998. Molecular phylogeny for Colias butterflies and their relatives (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 91: 524-531.
  • Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
  • Quek S-P, Davies SJ, Itino T, Pierce NE. 2004. Codiversification in an ant-plant mutualism: stem texture and the evolution of host use in Crematogaster (Formicidae: Myrmicinae) inhabitants of Macaranga (Euphorbiaceae). Evolution 58: 554-570.
  • Rand DB, Heath A, Suderman T, Pierce NE. 2000. Phylogeny and life history evolution of the genus Chrysoritis within the Aphnaeini (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae), inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome oxidae I sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 17: 85-96.
  • Reed RD, Sperling FAH. 1999. Interaction of process partitions in phylogenetic analysis: an example from the swallowtail butterfly genus Papilio. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 286-297.
  • Reuter E. 1896. Ueber die Palpen der Rhopaloceren. Ein Beitrag zur Erkenntniss der verwandtschaftlichen Beziehungen unter den Tagfaltern. Acta Societatia Scientiarum Fennicae 22: 1-577.
  • Robbins RK. 1982. How many butterfly species? News of the Lepidopterists' Society 3: 40-41.
  • Robbins RK. 1988. Comparative morphology of the butterfly foreleg coxa and trocanter (Lepidoptera) and its systematic implications. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 90: 133-154.
  • Robbins RK, Henson PM. 1986. Why Pieris rapae is a better name than Artogeia rapae (Pieridae). Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 40: 79-92.
  • Rober JKM. 1908-09. Pieridae section. In: Seitz A, ed. Macrolepidoptera of the world, Vol. 5. Stuttgart: Alfred Kernen, 53-111.
  • Rodriguez F, Oliver JL, Marin A, Medina JR. 1990. The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. Journal of Theoretical Biology 142: 485-501.
  • Roger AJ, Sandblom O, Doolittle WF, Philippe H. 1999. An evaluation of Elongation Factor 1α as a phylogenetic marker for eukaryotes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 218-233.
  • Ronquist F. 1997. Dispersal-vicariance analysis: a new approach to the quantification of historical biogeography. Systematic Biology 46: 195-203.
  • Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574.
  • Sanderson MJ. 2002. Estimating absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times: a penalized likelihood approach. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19: 101-109.
  • Sanmartin I, Ronquist F. 2004. Southern hemisphere biogeography inferred by event-based models: plant verses animal patterns. Systematic Biology 53: 216-243.
  • Saux C, Fisher BL, Spicer GS. 2004. Dracula ant phylogeny as inferred by nuclear 28S rDNA sequences and implications for ant systematics (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Amblyoponinae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 33: 457-468.
  • Schmitz J, Moritz RFA. 1994. Sequence analysis of the D1 and D2 regions of 28S rDNA in the hornet (Vespa crabro) (Hymenoptera, Vespinae). Insect Molecular Biology 3: 273- 277.
  • Scotese CR. 2001. Atlas of Earth history. Arlington: University of Texas.
  • Scott JA. 1985. The phylogeny of butterflies (Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea). Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 23: 241-281.
  • Scudder SH. 1875a. Fossil butterflies. Memoirs of the American Association for the Advancement of Science 1: 1- 99.
  • Scudder SH. 1875b. Historical sketch of the generic names proposed for butterflies. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 10(2d Series, Vol. 2): 89-294.
  • Scudder SH. 1889. The fossil butterflies of Florissant. US Geological Survey, 8th Annual Report Part I, 433-474.
  • Sequeira AS, Normark BB, Farrell BD. 2000. Evolutionary assembly of the conifer fauna: distinguishing ancient from recent associations in bark beetles. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 267: 2359-2366.
  • Sequencher. 1995. Sequencher, Version 3.0 for Macintosh. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Gene Codes Corporation.
  • Sequencher. 2000. Sequencher, Version 4.1.2 for Macintosh. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Gene Codes Corporation.
  • Shapiro AM. 1978a. The life history of an equatorial montane butterfly, Tatochila xanthodice (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). New York Entomological Society 86: 51-55.
  • Shapiro AM. 1978b. The life history of Reliquia santamarta, a Neotropical alpine pierine butterfly (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). New York Entomological Society 86: 45-50.
  • Shapiro AM. 1991. The zoogeography and systematics of the Argentine Andean and Patagonian Pierid fauna. Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 28: 137-238.
  • Shapiro AM. 1994. Why are there so few butterflies in the high Andes? Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 31: 25- 56.
  • Shields O. 1976. Fossil butterflies and the evolution of Lepidoptera. Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 15: 132-143.
  • Sikes DS, Lewis PO. 2001. Pauprat: Paup* implementation of the parsimony ratchet. Storrs: Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut.
  • Simon C, Frati F, Beckenbach A, Crespi BJ, Liu H, Flook P. 1994. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 87: 651-701.
  • Smith AG, Smith DG, Funnell BM. 1994. Atlas of Mesozoic and Cenozoic coastlines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sorenson MD. 1999. Treerot, Version 2. Boston: Boston University.
  • Sperling FAH. 2003. Butterfly molecular systematics: from species definitions to higher-level phylogenies. In: Boggs CL, Watt WB, Ehrlich PR, eds. Butterflies: ecology and evolution taking flight. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 431-458.
  • Stavenga DG, Stowe S, Siebke K, Zeil J, Arikawa K. 2004. Butterfly wing colours: scale beads make white pierid wings brighter. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 271: 1577-1584.
  • Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4 0b10 for Macintosh. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
  • Talbot G. 1935. Pieridae III. In: Aurivillius C, Wagner H, Strand E, eds. Lepidopterorum catalogus. Berlin: Dr W. Junk, 385-697.
  • Talbot G. 1939. The fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma butterflies, Vol. I. London: Taylor & Francis.
  • Tautz D, Hancock JM, Webb DA, Tautz C, Dover GA. 1988. Complete sequences of the rRNA genes of Drosophila melanogaster. Molecular Biology and Evolution 5: 366-376.
  • Tennent WJ. 1996. The butterflies of Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia. Wallingford: Gem Publishing.
  • Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. 1997. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 24: 4876-4882.
  • Vane-Wright RI. 2003. Evidence and identity in butterfly systematics. In: Boggs CL, Watt WB, Ehrlich PR, eds. Butterflies: ecology and evolution taking flight. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 477-513.
  • Vane-Wright RI, de Jong R. 2003. The butterflies of Sulawesi: annotated checklist for a critical island fauna. Zoologische Verhandelingen, Leiden 343: 3-267.
  • Venables BAB. 1993. Phylogeny of the white and sulphur butterflies (Pieridae). Dissertation project proposal. Made available by Dr R. K. Robbins, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution.
  • Wahlberg N, Braby MF, Brower AZ, de Jong RM-ML, Nylin S, Pierce NE, Sperling FAH, Vila RU, Warren AD, Zakharov E. 2005. Synergistic effects of combining morphological and molecular data in resolving the phylogeny of butterflies and skippers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 272(1572): 1577-1586.
  • Wahlberg N, Nylin S. 2003. Morphology versus molecules: resolution of the positions of Nymphalis, Polygonia, and related genera (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Cladistics 19: 213-223.
  • Wahlberg N, Weingartner E, Nylin S. 2003. Towards a better understanding of the higher systematics of Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 28: 473-484.
  • Watt WB, Donohue K, Carter PA. 1996. Adaptation at specific loci. VI. Divergence vs. parallelism of polymorphic allozymes in molecular function and fitness-component effects among Colias species (Lepidoptera, Pieridae). Molecular Biology and Evolution 13: 699-709.
  • Weller SJ, Friedlander TP, Martin JA, Pashley DP. 1992. Phylogenetic studies of ribosomal RNA variation in higher moths and butterflies (Lepidoptera: Ditrysia). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 1: 312-337.
  • Weller SJ, Pashley DP. 1995. In search of butterfly origins. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 4: 235-246.
  • Weller SJ, Pashley DP, Martin JA. 1996. Reassessment of butterfly family relationships using independent genes and morphology. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 89: 184-192.
  • Weller SJ, Pashley DP, Martin JA, Constable JL. 1994. Phylogeny of noctuid moths and the utility of combining independent nuclear and mitochondrial genes. Systematic Biology 43: 194-211.
  • White ME. 1994. After the greening, the browning of Australia. East Roseville, NSW: Kangaroo Press.
  • Yata O. 1985. Part 1: Pieridae. In: Tsukada E, ed. Butterflies of the South East Asian islands. II: Pieridae, Danaidae. Tokyo: Plapac, 33-120, 205-438.
  • Yoshimoto H. 2000. Wood whites (Pieridae), the most primitive pierids? Butterflies 26: 52-59.
  • Zakharov EV, Caterino MS, Sperling FAH. 2004. Molecular phylogeny, historical biogeography, and divergence time estimates for swallowtail butterflies of the genus Papilio (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Systematic Biology 53: 193-215.
  • Zeuner FE. 1942. Two new fossil butterflies of the family Pieridae. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 9: 409- 416.