Published December 9, 2003 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Congruent Patterns of Genetic and Morphological Variation in the Parthenogenetic Lizard Aspidoscelis tesselata (Squamata: Teiidae) and the Origins of Color Pattern Classes and Genotypic Clones in Eastern New Mexico

Description

TAYLOR, HARRY L., COLE, CHARLES J., DESSAUER, HERBERT C., PARKER, E. D. (2003): Congruent Patterns of Genetic and Morphological Variation in the Parthenogenetic Lizard Aspidoscelis tesselata (Squamata: Teiidae) and the Origins of Color Pattern Classes and Genotypic Clones in Eastern New Mexico. American Museum Novitates 3424: 1-40, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2003)424<0001:CPOGAM>2.0.CO;2, URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.1206/0003-0082%282003%29424%3C0001%3ACPOGAM%3E2.0.CO%3B2

Files

source.pdf

Files (1.5 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:1a6afb813217a3e8731e33c527db6c1c
1.5 MB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:1A6AFF813217FFE8731EFFC5FFDB6C1C

References

  • Abuhteba, R.M., J.M. Walker, and J.E. Cordes. 2000. Genetic homogeneity based on skin histocompatibility and the evolution and systematics of parthenogenetic Cnemidophorus laredoensis (Sauria: Teiidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 78: 895-904.
  • Brown, T.L. 1980. Now you see it, now you don't: herping at Los Esteros Reservoir. New Mexico Herpetological Society Newsletter 17(3): 1.
  • Cole, C.J. 1979. Chromosome inheritance in parthenogenetic lizards and evolution of allopolyploidy in reptiles. Journal of Heredity 70: 95- 102.
  • Cordes, J.E., and J.M. Walker. 2003. Skin histocompatibility between syntopic pattern classes C and D of parthenogenetic Cnemidophorus tesselatus in New Mexico. Journal of Herpetology 37: 185-188.
  • Cuellar, O. 1976. Intraclonal histocompatibility in a parthenogenetic lizard: evidence of genetic homogeneity. Science 193: 150-153.
  • Cuellar, O. 1977a. Animal parthenogenesis: a new evolutionary-ecological model is needed. Science 197: 837-843.
  • Cuellar, O. 1977b. Genetic homogeneity and speciation in the parthenogenetic lizards Cnemidophorus velox and C. neomexicanus: evidence from intraspecific histocompatibility. Evolution 31: 24-31.
  • Cuellar, O. 1979. On the ecology of coexistence in parthenogenetic and bisexual lizards of the genus Cnemidophorus. American Zoologist 19: 773-786.
  • Cuellar, O., and C. Smart. 1977. Analysis of histoincompatibility in a natural population of the bisexual whiptail lizard Cnemidophorus tigris. Transplantation 24: 127-133.
  • Cuellar, O., and C. Smart. 1979. On the genetics of transplantation in the lizard Cnemidophorus tigris. Immunogenetics 8: 109-118.
  • Degenhardt, W.G., C.W. Painter, and A.H. Price. 1996. Amphibians and reptiles of New Mexico. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
  • Densmore, III, L.D., J.W. Wright, and W.M. Brown. 1989. Mitochondrial-DNA analyses and the origin and relative age of parthenogenetic lizards (genus Cnemidophorus). II. C. neomexicanus and the C. tesselatus complex. Evolution 43: 943-957.
  • de Queiroz, K. 1998. The general lineage concept of species, species criteria, and the process of speciation: a conceptual unification and terminological recommendation. In D.J. Howard and S.H. Berlocher (editors), Endless forms: species and speciation: 57-75. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • de Queiroz, K., and D.A. Good. 1997. Phenetic clustering in biology: a critique. The Quarterly Review of Biology 72: 3-30.
  • Dessauer, H.C., and C.J. Cole. 1986. Clonal inheritance in parthenogenetic whiptail lizards: biochemical evidence. Journal of Heredity 77: 8-12.
  • Dessauer, H.C., and C.J. Cole. 1989. Diversity between and within nominal forms of unisexual teiid lizards. In R.M. Dawley and J.P. Bogart (editors), Evolution and ecology of unisexual vertebrates: 49-71. Albany, NY: New York State Museum Bulletin 466.
  • Dessauer, H.C., C.J. Cole, and C.R. Townsend. 2000. Hybridization among western whiptail lizards (Cnemidophorus tigris) in southwestern New Mexico: population genetics, morphology, and ecology in three contact zones. Bulletin American Museum Natural History 246: 1- 148.
  • Dessauer, H.C., T.W. Reeder, C.J. Cole, and A. Knight. 1996. Rapid screening of DNA diversity using dot-blot technology and allele-specific oligonucleotides: maternity of hybrids and unisexual clones of hybrid origin (lizards, Cnemidophorus). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 6: 366-372.
  • Dixon, J.R. 2000. Amphibians and reptiles of Texas, 2nd ed. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.
  • Echelle, A.A. 1990. Nomenclature and non-Mendelian (''clonal'') vertebrates. Systematic Zoology 39: 70-78.
  • Frost, D.R., and D.M. Hillis. 1990. Species in concept and practice: herpetological applications. Herpetologica 46: 87-104.
  • Gebhardt, B.M. 1996. The major histocompatibility complex and transplantation. In W.A. Volk, B.M. Gebhardt, M.-L. Hammarskjold, and R.J. Kadner (editors), Essentials of medical microbiology, 5th ed.: 121-135. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven.
  • Hammerson, G.A. 1999. Amphibians and reptiles in Colorado, 2nd ed. Niwot, CO: University Press of Colorado.
  • Harris, H., and D.A. Hopkinson. 1976. Handbook of enzyme electrophoresis in human genetics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  • Hernandez-Gallegos, O., N. Manriquez-Moran, F.R. Mendez, M. Villagran, and O. Cuellar. 1998. Histocompatibility in parthenogenetic lizards of the Cnemidophorus cozumela com- plex from the Yucatan Peninsula of Mexico. Biogeographica 74: 117-124.
  • Hillis, D.M., C. Moritz, C.A. Porter, and R.J. Bak- er. 1991. Evidence for biased gene conversion in concerted evolution of ribosomal DNA. Science 251: 308-310.
  • Manriquez-Moran, N.L., M. Villagran-Santa Cruz, and F.R. Mendez-de la Cruz. 2000. Origin and evolution of the parthenogenetic lizards, Cnemidophorus maslini and C. cozumela. Journal of Herpetology 34: 634-637.
  • Maslin, T.P. 1967. Skin grafting in the bisexual teiid lizard Cnemidophorus sexlineatus and in the unisexual C. tesselatus. Journal of Experimental Zoology 166: 137-150.
  • Murphy, R.W., J.W. Sites, Jr., D.G. Buth, and C.H. Haufler. 1996. Proteins: isozyme electrophoresis. In D.M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B.K. Mable (editors), Molecular systematics, 2nd ed.: 51- 120. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
  • Neaves, W.B. 1969. Adenosine deaminase phenotypes among sexual and parthenogenetic lizards in the genus Cnemidophorus (Teiidae). Journal of Experimental Zoology 171: 175- 183.
  • Parker, E.D., Jr. 1979. Phenotypic consequences of parthenogenesis in Cnemidophorus lizards. I. Variability in parthenogenetic and sexual populations. Evolution 33: 1150-1166.
  • Parker, E.D., Jr., and R.K. Selander. 1976. The organization of genetic diversity in the parthenogenetic lizard Cnemidophorus tesselatus. Genetics 84: 791-805.
  • Parker, E.D., Jr., J.M. Walker, and M.A. Paulissen. 1989. Clonal diversity in Cnemidophorus: ecological and morphological consequences. In R. Dawley and J.P. Bogart (editors), Evolution and ecology of unisexual vertebrates: 72-86. Albany, NY: New York State Museum Bulletin 466.
  • Price, A.H. 1992. Comparative behavior in lizards of the genus Cnemidophorus (Teiidae), with comments on the evolution of parthenogenesis in reptiles. Copeia 1992: 323-331.
  • Price, A.H., J.L. LaPointe, and J.W. Atmar. 1993. The ecology and evolutionary implications of competition and parthenogenesis in Cnemidophorus. In J.W. Wright and L.J. Vitt (editors), Biology of whiptail lizards (genus Cnemidophorus): 371-410. Norman, OK: Oklahoma Museum of Natural History.
  • Reeder, T.W., C.J. Cole, and H.C. Dessauer. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of whiptail lizards of the genus Cnemidophorus (Squamata: Teiidae): a test of monophyly, reevaluation of karyotypic evolution, and review of hybrid origins. American Museum Novitates 3365: 1-61.
  • Sattath, S., and A. Tversky. 1977. Additive similarity trees. Psychometrika 42: 319-345.
  • Schmitz, A., M. Vences, S. Weitkus, T. Ziegler, and W. Bohme. 2001. Recent maternal divergence of the parthenogenetic lizard Leiolepis guentherpetersi from L. guttata: molecular evidence (Reptilia: Squamata: Agamidae). Zoologische Abhandlungen Staatliches Museum fur Tierkunde Dresden 51: 355-360.
  • Scudday, J.F. 1973. A new species of lizard of the Cnemidophorus tesselatus group from Texas. Journal of Herpetology 7: 363-371.
  • Scudday, J.F., and J.R. Dixon. 1973. Diet and feeding behavior of teiid lizards from Trans- Pecos, Texas. Southwestern Naturalist 18: 279- 289.
  • Taylor, H.L., and C.R. Cooley. 1995a. A multivariate analysis of morphological variation among parthenogenetic teiid lizards of the Cnemidophorus cozumela complex. Herpetologica 51: 67-76.
  • Taylor, H.L., and C.R. Cooley. 1995b. Patterns of meristic variation among parthenogenetic teiid lizards (genus Cnemidophorus) of the Yucatan Peninsula and their progenitor species, C. angusticeps and C. deppei. Journal of Herpetology 29: 583-592.
  • Taylor, H.L., J.M. Walker, and J.E. Cordes. 1996. Systematic implications of morphologically distinct populations of parthenogenetic whiptail lizards: Cnemidophorus tesselatus pattern class D. Herpetologica 52: 254-262.
  • Taylor, H.L., J.M. Walker, and J.E. Cordes. 1997. Reproductive characteristics and body size in the parthenogenetic teiid lizard Cnemidophorus tesselatus: comparison of sympatric color pattern classes C and E in De Baca County, New Mexico. Copeia 1997: 863-868.
  • Taylor, H.L., J.M. Walker, and J.E. Cordes. 2000. Ecological patterns of body-size and clutch-size variation in the parthenogenetic teiid lizard Cnemidophorus tesselatus. Herpetologica 56: 45-54.
  • Taylor, H.L., C.J. Cole, L.M. Hardy, H.C. Dessauer, C.R. Townsend, J.M. Walker, and J.E. Cordes. 2001. Natural hybridization between the teiid lizards Cnemidophorus tesselatus (parthenogenetic) and C. tigris marmoratus (bisexual): assessment of evolutionary alternatives. American Museum Novitates 3345: 1-64.
  • Walker, J.M., H.L. Taylor, and J.E. Cordes. 1995. Parthenogenetic Cnemidophorus tesselatus complex at Higbee, Colorado: resolution of 30 years of controversy. Copeia 1995: 650-658.
  • Walker, J.M., J.E. Cordes, and H.L. Taylor. 1997a. Parthenogenetic Cnemidophorus tesselatus complex (Sauria: Teiidae): a neotype for diploid C. tesselatus (Say, 1823), redescription of the taxon, and description of a new triploid species. Herpetologica 53: 233-259.
  • Walker, J.M., H.L. Taylor, J.E. Cordes, and M.A. Paulissen. 1997b [1998]. Distributional relationships and community assemblages of three members of the parthenogenetic Cnemidophorus tesselatus complex and C. sexlineatus (Squamata: Teiidae) at Higbee, Otero County, Colorado. Herpetological Natural History 5: 165-174.
  • Webb, R.G. 1970. Reptiles of Oklahoma. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
  • Wiley, E.O., and R.L. Mayden. 2000. The evolutionary species concept. In Q.D. Wheeler and R. Meier (editors), Species concepts and phylogenetic theory: a debate: 70-89. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Wilkinson, L., G. Blank, and C. Gruber. 1996. Desktop data analysis with SYSTAT. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Wright, J.W., and C.H. Lowe. 1967. Hybridization in nature between parthenogenetic and bisexual species of whiptail lizards (genus Cnemidophorus). American Museum Novitates 2286: 1-36.
  • Zweifel, R.G. 1965. Variation in and distribution of the unisexual lizard, Cnemidophorus tesselatus. American Museum Novitates 2235: 1- 49.