Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published October 29, 2003 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Descriptive Osteology of the Family Chaudhuriidae (Teleostei, Synbranchiformes, Mastacembeloidei), with a Discussion of Its Relationships

Authors/Creators

Description

BRITZ, RALF, KOTTELAT, MAURICE (2003): Descriptive Osteology of the Family Chaudhuriidae (Teleostei, Synbranchiformes, Mastacembeloidei), with a Discussion of Its Relationships. American Museum Novitates 3418: 1-63, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2003)418<0001:DOOTFC>2.0.CO;2, URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.1206/0003-0082%282003%29418%3C0001%3ADOOTFC%3E2.0.CO%3B2

Files

source.pdf

Files (4.1 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:51c8b678fa16704713788a5bda6caf18
4.1 MB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FFC8B678FA16704713788A5BDA6CAF18

Has part
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5374075 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5374078 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5374080 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5374082 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5374084 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5374086 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5374088 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5374090 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5374092 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5374096 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5374098 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5374100 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5374102 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5374104 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5374106 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5374108 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5374110 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5374114 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5374116 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5374118 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5374120 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5374122 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5374124 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5374126 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5374128 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5374130 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5374132 (DOI)

References

  • Annandale, N. 1918. Fish and fisheries of the Inle Lake. Records of the Indian Museum 14: 33- 64.
  • Annandale, N., and S.L. Hora. 1923. The systematic position of the Burmese fish Chaudhuria. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 11,9. series: 327-333.
  • Banister, K.E. 1970. The anatomy and taxonomy of Indostomus paradoxus. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History 19: 179-209.
  • Bhargava, H.N. 1958. The development of the chondrocranium of Mastacembelus armatus (Cuv. & Val.). Journal of Morphology 102: 401-426.
  • Britz, R. 1996. Ontogeny of the ethmoidal region and hyopalatine arch in Macrognathus pancalus (Teleostei, Mastacembeloidei), with critical remarks on mastacembeloid inter- and intrarelationships. American Museum Novitates 3181: 1-18.
  • Britz, R., and G.D. Johnson. 2002. ''Paradox Lost'': Skeletal ontogeny of Indostomus paradoxus and its significance for the phylogenetic relationships of Indostomidae (Teleostei, Gasterosteiformes). American Museum Novitates 3383: 1-43.
  • Britz, R., and M. Kottelat. 1999. Sundasalanx mekongensis, a new species of clupeiform fish from the Mekong basin. Ichthyological Explorations of Freshwaters 10: 337-344.
  • Fujita, K. 1990. The caudal skeleton of teleostean fishes. Tokyo: Tokai University Press, xiii + 897 pp.
  • Gosline, W.A. 1983. The relationships of the mastacembelid and synbranchid fishes. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology 29: 323-328.
  • Grandel, H., and S. Schulte-Merker. 1998. The development of the paired fins in the zebrafish (Danio rerio). Mechanisms of Development 79: 99-120.
  • Greenwood, P.H. 1986. The pars jugularis and the relationships of cichlid fishes (Labroidei, Te- leostei). Journal of Natural History 20: 949- 974.
  • Johnson, G.D. 1992. Monophyly of the euteleostean clades-Neoteleostei, Eurypterygii, and Ctenosqamata. Copeia 1992: 8-25.
  • Johnson, G.D., and E.B. Brothers. 1993. Schindleria: a paedomorphic goby (Teleostei: Gobioidei). Bulletin of Marine Science 52: 441- 471.
  • Johnson, G.D., and C. Patterson. 1993. Percomorph phylogeny: a survey of acanthomorphs and a new proposal. Bulletin of Marine Science 52: 554-626.
  • Johnson, G.D., and C. Patterson. 2001. The intermuscular system of acanthomorph fishes: a commentary. American Museum Novitates 3312: 1-24.
  • Kerle, R., R. Britz, and P.K.L. Ng. 2000. Habitat preference, reproduction and diet of the earthworm eel, Chendol keelini (Teleostei: Chaudhuriidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes 57: 413-422.
  • Kottelat, M. 1991. Notes on the taxonomy and distribution of some Western Indonesian freshwater fishes, with diagnoses of a new genus and six new species (Pisces: Cyprinidae, Belontiidae, and Chaudhuriidae). Ichthyological Explorations of Freshwaters 2: 273-287.
  • Kottelat, M. 2000. Diagnoses of a new genus and 64 new species of fishes from Laos (Teleostei: Cyprinidae, Balitoridae, Bagridae, Syngnathidae, Chaudhuriidae and Tetraodontidae). Journal of South Asian Natural History 5: 37-82.
  • Kottelat, M., and K.K.P. Lim. 1994. Diagnoses of two new genera and three new species of earthworm eels from the Malay Peninsula and Borneo (Teleostei: Chaudhuriidae). Ichthyological Explorations of Freshwaters 5: 181-190.
  • Kullander, S.O., R. Britz, and F. Fang. 2000. Pillaia kachinica, a new chaudhuriid fish species from Myanmar, with observations on the genus Garo (Teleostei: Mastacembeloidei: Chaudhuriidae). Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters 11: 327-334.
  • Lauder, G.V. and K.F. Liem. 1983. The evolution and interrelationships of the actinopterygian fishes. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 150: 95-197.
  • Monod, T. 1968. Le complexe urophore des poissons teleosteens. Memoires de l'Institut fondamental d'Afrique Noire 81: 1-705.
  • Nelson, G.J. 1969. Gill arches and the phylogeny of fishes, with notes on the classification of vertebrates. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 141: 475-552.
  • Nichols, J.T. 1943. The fresh-water fishes of China. New York: The American Museum of Natural History.
  • Patterson, C. 1964. A review of the acanthopterygian fishes, with special reference to those of the English Chalk. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 247B: 213- 482.
  • Patterson, C. 1975. The braincase of pholidophorid and leptolepid fishes, with a review of the actinopterygian braincase. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 269B: 279-579.
  • Patterson, C., and G.D. Johnson. 1995. The intermuscular bones and ligaments of teleostean fishes. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 559: 1-85.
  • Potthoff, T., and J.A. Tellock. 1993. Osteological development of the snook, Centropomus undecimalis (Teleostei, Centropomidae). Bulletin of Marine Science 52: 669-716.
  • Potthoff, T., S. Kelley, M. Moe, and F. Young. 1984. Description of porkfish larvae (Anisotremus virginicus, Haemulidae) and their osteological development. Bulletin of Marine Science 34: 21-59.
  • Potthoff, T., S. Kelley, V. Saksena, M. Moe, and F. Young. 1987. Description of larval and juvenile yellowtail damselfish, Microspathodon chrysurus, Pomacentridae, and their osteological development. Bulletin of Marine Science 40: 330-375.
  • Potthoff, T., S. Kelley, and L.A. Collins. 1988. Osteological development of the red snapper, Lutjanus campechanus (Lutjanidae). Bulletin of Marine Science 43: 1-40.
  • Rastogi, M. 1964. The head skeleton of Amphipnous cuchia (Ham.). Acta Zoologica (Stockholm) 46: 283-292.
  • Regan, C.T. 1919. Note on Chaudhuria, a teleostean fish of the order Opisthomi. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 3,9. series: 198- 199.
  • Roberts, T. 1984. Skeletal anatomy and classification of the neotenic Asian salmoniform superfamily Salangoidea (icefishes or noodlefishes). Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 43: 1-40.
  • Rosen, D.E. 1973. Interrelationships of higher euteleostean fishes. In P.H. Greenwood, R.S. Miles, and C. Patterson (editors), Interrelationships of fishes. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, Vol. 53,Suppl. 1: 397-513.
  • Rosen, D.E., and P.H. Greenwood. 1976. A fourth neotropical species of synbranchid eel and the phylogeny and systematics of synbranchiform fishes. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 157: 1-70.
  • Rosen, D.E., and C. Patterson. 1990. On Muller's and Cuvier's concepts of pharyngognath and labyrinth fishes and the classification of per- comorph fishes, with an atlas of percomorph dorsal gill arches. American Museum Novitates 2983: 1-57.
  • Siebert, D. 1997. Notes on the anatomy and relationships of Sundasalanx Roberts (Teleostei, Clupeidae), with descriptions of four new species from Borneo. Bulletin of the Natural History Museum, London (Zoology) 63: 13-26.
  • Talwar, P.K., and A.G. Jhingran. 1992. Inland fishes of India and adjacent countries, Vol. 2. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.
  • Talwar, P.K., G.M. Yazdani, and D.K. Kundu. 1977. On a new eel-like fish of the genus Pillaia Yazdani (Pisces: Mastacembeloidei) from India. Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences 85B: 53-56.
  • Travers, R.A. 1981. The interarcual cartilage; a review of its development, distribution and value as an indicator of phyletic relationships in euteleostean fishes. Journal of Natural History 15: 853-871.
  • Travers, R.A. 1984a. A review of the Mastacembeloidei, a suborder of synbranchiform fishes. Part I: anatomical descriptions. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Zoology) 46: 1-133.
  • Travers, R.A. 1984b. A review of the Mastacembeloidei, a suborder of synbranchiform teleost fishes. Part II: Phylogenetic analysis. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Zoology) 47: 83-150.
  • Weitzman, S.H., and R.P. Vari. 1988. Miniaturization in South American freshwater fishes; an overview and discussion. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 101: 444- 465.
  • Whitehouse, R.H. 1918. The caudal fin of the eel Chaudhuria. Records of the Indian Museum 14: 65-66.
  • Yazdani, G.M. 1972. A new genus and species of fish from India. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 69: 134-135.
  • Yazdani, G.M. 1976. A new family of mastacembeloid fish from India. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 73: 166-170.
  • Yazdani, G.M. 1978. Adaptive radiation in the mastacembeloid fishes. Bulletin of the Zoological Survey of India 1: 279-290.
  • Yazdani, G.M. 1990. Contribution to the fish fauna of India (including adjacent countries) Order Mastacembeli Forms [sic]. Records of the Zoological Survey of India, Occasional Papers 124: 1-36.
  • Yazdani, G.M., and P.K. Talwar. 1981. On the generic relationships of the eel-like fish, Pillaia khajuriai Talwar, Yazdani & Kundu (Perciformes, Mastacembeloidei). Bulletin of the Zoological Survey of India 4: 287-288.