Published May 14, 2010 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Euconulinae H. B. Baker 1928

Description

Subfamily Euconulinae

Remarks. Euconulinae was monophyletic in all our analyses, supported by the presence of radial ribs on the protoconch. Hausdorf (1998) did not recognise Euconulinae and Microcystinae as separate taxa in his analysis, including them both under the family Euconulidae; however, he pointed out that there are no known synapomorphies for Euconulinae and that it might be paraphyletic.

Based on our analysis the Euconulinae is supported by the following key characters:

Shell not reduced; sculptured with fine spiral and radial ribs. Genital system oviparous (rarely ovoviviparous); bursa copulatrix inserted on vagina; vestigial penial stimulator present in some taxa; epiphallic retractor caecum and flagellum absent.

The spermatophore is unknown for this group and may be absent.

Description. Shell present, not reduced. Protoconch and teleoconch sculptured with fine spiral and radial ribs. Whorl profile flattened above and below evenly convex periphery. Internal walls of early whorls complete; umbilicus closed. Mantle laps and lobes absent. Sole of foot tripartite; caudal apparatus formed from curled up sole (Muratov’s 1999 helicarionid type); caudal apparatus very small to moderately large; caudal foss horizontal slit in tail. Kidney unilobed; mantle with no visible minor blood vessels, pigmentation absent or present, mantle gland absent or present. Genital system oviparous (rarely ovoviviparous; Hausdorf 1998); oviduct glandular. Neither carrefour nor talon embedded in albumen gland. Bursa copulatrix short, inserted on vagina; duct of bursa copulatrix wide, not distinguishable from bursa copulatrix. Vagina short. Stimulator absent, or vestiges of stimulator present as diverticulum on base of penis. Epiphallus enters penis through a simple pore (Coneuplecta) or a verge (Nevelasta Iredale, 1937); interior of penis smooth or with diagonal ridges. Penial sheath present. Epiphallic retractor caecum absent; epiphallic flagellum absent. Spermatophore not present in any dissected specimens.

Notes

Published as part of Hyman, Isabel T. & Ponder, Winston F., 2010, A morphological phylogenetic analysis and generic revision of Australian Helicarionidae (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Stylommatophora), and an assessment of the relationships of the family 2462, pp. 1-148 in Zootaxa 2462 (1) on page 106, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.2462.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5312710

Files

Files (2.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:3b0a6056ec1803e9316d9b1a09aaefe1
2.4 kB Download

System files (9.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:be1d1097a62d4665079b3dcd9afbf1c3
9.4 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Scientific name authorship
H. B. Baker
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
Mollusca
Order
Stylommatophora
Family
Euconulidae
Taxon rank
subFamily
Taxonomic concept label
Euconulinae Baker, 1928 sec. Hyman & Ponder, 2010

References

  • Hausdorf, B. (1998) Phylogeny of the Limacoidea sensu lato (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora). Journal of Molluscan Studies, 64, 35 - 66.
  • Muratov, I. V. (1999) Analysis of the phylogenetic relationships and their systematic implications in the Limacoinei (= Zonitinia) infraorder (Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Geophila). Ruthenica, 9, 5 - 26.