(Figs. 31, 32)

Phalaena cinerea Hufnagel, 1766, Berlinisches Magazin 3: 416 (Type-locality: Germany, Berlin)

Synonymy: abscondida Treitschke, 1835; myricae Guenée, 1814; korlana Draudt, 1931, syn. n.; artobowskii Wojitusiak & Nesilovski, 1946; cinerascens Kozhanchikov, 1950, syn. n.

Acronicta cinerascens Kozhanchikov, 1950, Fauna SSSR 12: 533 (Holotype: North China, Beitsegou [ZISP, St.Peterburg]), syn. n

Notes. During the present study, through the courtesy of A. Matov (ZISP), we examined the holotype and the genitalic preparation of Acronicta cinerascens preserved in the collection of ZISP (Figs. 31, 32). The species was described by Kozhanchikov (1950) on the basis of a single specimen from North China. The holotype is supplemented by labels: “North China Beitsegou Putjata 4-viii-[18]91” (in Russian), “ Acronicta cinerascens sp. n. Kozh” and a golden circular label, denoting the holotype. The specimen was not dissected by Kozhanchikov during description. The genitalic preparation was made by A. Matov by our request. After examination of the photographs of the holotype and genitalic slide we concluded that Acronicta cinerascens was conspecific with A. cinerea. Acronicta cinerea is reported for China for the first time, while its sister species A. euphorbiae was reported for China by Draudt (1931) who described subspecies A. euphorbiae korlana (Draudt, 1931) from northwest China (Xinjiang). This record, however, apparently belongs to A. cinerea. According to Fibiger et al (2009) A. euphorbiae has an Atlantic-Mediterranean distribution, while A. cinerea is Euro-Asiatic. Our studyies (Kononenko 2005, 2010) indicate that only A. cinerea occurs in the Asian part of Russia, near China. Consequently, A. korlana should be treated as a synonym of cinerea, not euphorbiae.