Published August 29, 2013 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

Simplification of the enameloid microstructure of large stingrays (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes): a functional approach

Description

Enault, Sebastien, Cappetta, Henri, Adnet, Sylvain (2013): Simplification of the enameloid microstructure of large stingrays (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes): a functional approach. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 169 (1): 144-155, DOI: 10.1111/zoj.12059, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12059

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:7467FF85FF97FF909D5F0736E50A5A20

Related works

References

  • Adnet S, Cappetta H, Guinot G, Notarbartolo di Sciaria G. 2012. Evolutionary history of the devilrays (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes) from fossil and morphological inference. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 166: 132-159.
  • Allen D, Robertson D. 1994. Fishes of the tropical Eastern Pacific. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
  • Andreev PS, Cuny G. 2012. New Triassic stem selachimorphs (Chondrichthyes, Elasmobranchii) and their bearing on the evolution of dental enameloid in Neoselachii. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 32: 255-266.
  • Aschliman NC, Nishida M, Miya M, Inoue JG, Rosana KM, Naylor GJP. 2012. Body plan convergence in the evolution of skates and rays (Chondrichthyes: Batoidea). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 63: 28-42.
  • Botella H, Donoghue PC, Martinez-Perez C. 2009a. Enameloid microstructure in the oldest known chondrichthyan teeth. Acta Zoologica (Stockholm) 90: 103-108.
  • Botella H, Plasencia P, Marquez-Aliaga A, Cuny G, Dorka M. 2009b. Pseudodalatias henarejensis nov. sp. a new pseudodalatiid (Elasmobranchii) from the Middle Triassic of Spain. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 29: 1-7.
  • Cappetta H. 1970. Les Selaciens du Miocene de la region de Montpellier. Palaeovertebrata 1970: 1-139.
  • Cappetta H. 1987. Mesozoic and Cenozoic Elasmobranchii, Chondrichthyes II. In: Schultze HP, ed. Handbook of paleoichthyology. Stuttgart: Verlag F. Pfeil, 1-193.
  • Cappetta H. 2006. Elasmobranchii post-Triadici (index specierum et generum). Fossilium Catalogus, I. Animalia Pars 142: 1-472.
  • Cappetta H. 2012. Mesozoic and Cenozoic Elasmobranchii: teeth, chondrichthyes. In: Schultze HP, ed. Handbook of paleoichthyology. Stuttgart: Verlag F. Pfeil, 1-512.
  • Cappetta H, Stringer GL. 2002. A new batoid genus (Neoselachii: Myliobatiformes) from the Yazoo Clay (Upper Eocene) of Louisiana, U.S.A. Tertiary Research 21: 51-56.
  • Carvalho MR. 1996. Higher-level elasmobranch phylogeny, basal squaleans, and paraphyly. In: Stassny MLJ, Parent LR, Johnson GD, eds. Interrelationships of fishes. San Diego: Academic Press, 35-62.
  • Case GR, Tokaryk TT, Baird D. 1990. Selachians from the Niobrara Formation of the Upper Cretaceous (Coniacian) of Carrot River, Saskatchewan, Canada. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 27: 1084-1094.
  • Cavin L. 2010. On giant filter feeders. Science 327: 968-969.
  • Cicimurri DJ, Knight JL. 2009. Late Oligocene sharks and rays from the Chandler Bridge Formation, Dorchester County, South Carolina, USA. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 54: 627-647.
  • Claeson KM, O'Leary MA, Roberts EM, Sissoko F, Bouareal M, Tapanila L, Goodwin D, Gottfried MD. 2010. First Mesozoic record of the stingray Myliobatis wurnoensis from Mali and a phylogenetic analysis of Myliobatidae incorporating dental characters. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 55: 655-674.
  • Compagno LJV. 1973. Interrelationships of living elasmobranchs. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 53 (Suppl. 1): 15-61.
  • Compagno LJV. 1977. Phyletic relatonships of living sharks and rays. American Zoologist 17: 303-322.
  • Cuny G, Rieppel O, Sander PM. 2001. The shark fauna from the Middle Triassic (Anisian) of North-Western Nevada. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 133: 285-301.
  • Cuny G, Risnes S. 2005. The enameloid microstructure of the teeth of Synechodontiform sharks (Chondrichthyes, Neoselachii). PalArch 3: 8-19.
  • Cuny G, Srisuk P, Khamha S, Suteethorn V, Tong H. 2009. A new elasmobranch fauna from the middle Jurassic of southern Thailand. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 315: 97-113.
  • Dean MN, Bizzarro JJ, Summers AP. 2007. The evolution of cranial design, diet and feeding mechanisms in batoid fishes. Integrative and Comparative Biology 47: 70-81.
  • Delsate D, Candoni LW. 2001. Description de nouveaux morphotypes dentaires de Batomorphii toarciens (Jurassique inferieur) de Bassin de Paris: archaeobatidae nov fam. Bulletin de la Societe des Naturalistes Luxembourgeois 102: 131-143.
  • Douady CJ, Dosay M, Mahmood SS, Stanhope MJ. 2003. Molecular phylogenetic evidence refuting the hypothesis of Batoidea (rays and skates) as derived sharks. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 26: 215-221.
  • Gillis JA, Donoghue PCJ. 2007. The homology and phylogeny of chondrichthyan tooth enameloid. Journal of Morphology 268: 33-49.
  • Ginter M, Hampe O, Duffin CJ. 2010. Paleozoic Elasmobranchii: teeth, chondrichthyes. In: Schultze HP, ed. Handbook of paleoichthyology. Stuttgart: Verlag F. Pfeil, 1-168.
  • Guinot G, Cappetta H. 2011. Enameloid microstructure of some Cretaceous Hexanchiformes and Synechodontiformes (Chondrichthyes, Neoselachii): new structures and systematic implications. Microscopy Research and Technique 74: 196-205.
  • Holmgren N. 1941. Studies on the head in fishes. Embryological, morphological and phylogenetical researches. Part II: comparative anatomy of the adult selachian skull, with remarks on the dorsal fins in sharks. Acta Zoologica Stockholm 22: 1-100.
  • Kriwet J, Kiessling W, Klug S. 2009. Diversification trajectories and evolutionary life-history traits in early sharks and batoids. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 276: 945- 951.
  • Lovejoy NR. 1996. Systematics of myliobatoid elasmobranchs: with emphasis on the phylogeny and historical biogeography of neotropical freshwater stingrays (Potamotrygonidae: Rajiformes). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 117: 207-257.
  • Maisey JG. 1985. Cranial morphology of the fossil elasmobranch Synechodus dubrisiensis. American Museum Novitates 2804: 1-28.
  • Maisey JG, Naylor GJP, Ward DJ. 2004. Mesozoic elasmobranchs, neoselachian phylogeny and the rise of modern elasmobranch diversity. In: Arratia G and Tintori A eds. Mesozoic fishes 3 - Sytematics, paleoenvironments and biodiversity. Munchen: Verlag F. Pfeil, 17-56.
  • Marshall AD. 2009. Biology and population ecology of Manta birostris in southern Mozambique. PhD Thesis, University of Queensland.
  • Marshall AD, Compagno LJV, Benett MB. 2009. Redescription of the genus Manta with resurrection of Manta alfredi (Krefft, 1868) (Chondrichthyes; Myliobatoidei; Mobulidae). Zootaxa 2301: 1-28.
  • McEachran JD, Dunn KA. 1998. Phylogenetic analysis of skates, a morphologically conservative clade of elasmobranchs (Chondrichthyes: Rajidae). Copeia 2: 271-290.
  • McEachran JD, Dunn KA, Miyake T. 1996. Interrelationships of the batoid fishes (Chondrichthyes: Batoidea). In: Stiassny MLJ, Parenti LR, Johnson GD, eds. Interrelationships of fishes. London: Academic Press, 63-82.
  • Nishida K. 1990. Phylogeny of the suborder Myliobatoidei. Memoirs of the Faculty of Fisheries, Hokkaido University 37: 1-108.
  • Noubhani A, Cappetta H. 1997. Les Orectolobiformes, Carcharhiniformes et Myliobatiformes (Elasmobranchii, Neoselachii) des bassins a phosphate du Maroc (Maastrichtien-Lutetien basal). Systematique, biostratigraphie, evolution et dynamique des faunes. Palaeo Ichthyologica 8: 1-327.
  • Preuschoft H, Reif WE, Muller WH. 1974. Fuktionsanpassungen in Form und Struktur an Haifischzahnen. Zeitschrift fur Anatomie und Entwicklungsgechichte 143: 315-344.
  • Purdy RW, Schneider VP, Applegate SP, McLellan JH, Meyer RL, Slaughter BH. 2001. The Neogene sharks, rays, and bony fishes from Lee Creek Mine, Aurora, North Carolina in Geology and paleontology of the Lee Creek Mine, North Carolina, III, Clayton E. Ray & David J. Bohaska. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 90: 71-202.
  • Regan CT. 1906. A classification of the selachian fishes. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1906: 722- 758.
  • Reif WE. 1973. Morphologie und ultrastruktur des Hai- 'Schmelzes'. Zoologica Scripta 2: 231-250.
  • Reif WE. 1977. Tooth enameloid as a taxonomic criterion. I. A new euselachian shark from the Rhaeic-Liassic boundary. Neues Jahrbuch fur Geologie und Palaontologie, Monatshefte 1977: 565-576.
  • Reif WE. 1979. Structural convergences between enameloid and actinopterygian teeth and of shark teeth. Scanning Electron Microscopy 2: 546-554.
  • Summers AP. 2000. Stiffening the stingray skeleton-an investigation of durophagy in myliobatid stingrays (Chondrichthyes, Batoidea, Myliobatidae). Journal of Morphology 243: 113-126.
  • Summers AP, Koob TJ, Brainerd EL. 1998. Stingray jaws strut their stuff. Nature 395: 450-451.
  • Thies D. 1982. A neoselachian shark tooth from the lower Triassic of the Kocaeli (=Bithynian) Peninsula, W Turkey. Neues Jahrbuch fur Geologie und Palaontologie, Monatshefte 1992: 272-278.
  • Underwood CJ. 2004. Environmental controls on the distribution of neoselachian sharks and rays within the British Bathonian (Middle Jurassic). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeobiology 203: 107-126.
  • Underwood CJ. 2006. Diversification of the Neoselachii (Chondrichthyes) during the Jurassic and Cretaceous. Paleobiology 32: 215-235.
  • Underwood CJ, Cumbaa SL. 2010. Chondrichthyans from a Cenomanian (Late Cretaceous) bonebed, Saskatchewan, Canada. Palaeontology 53: 903-944.
  • Underwood CJ, Ward DJ, King C, Antar SM, Zalmout IS, Gingerich PD. 2011. Shark and ray faunas in the Middle and Late Eocene of the Fayum Area, Egypt. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association of London 122: 47-66.
  • Winchell CJ, Martin AP, Mallatt J. 2004. Phylogeny of Elasmobranchs based on LSU and SSU ribosomal RNA genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31: 214- 224.