Published April 4, 2013
| Version v1
Figure
Open
FIGURE 4 in To name or not to name: Criteria to promote economy of change in Linnaean classification schemes
Authors/Creators
- 1. Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica, Centro de Investigación de la Biodiversidad y el Cambio Climático, Calle Machala y Sabanilla, Cotocollao, Quito, Ecuador
- 2. CNRS-UMR5175 CEFE, Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, 1919 route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier cedex 5, France Department of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, C/José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, Madrid 28006, Spain
Description
FIGURE 4. Non-exhaustive series of examples of the outcome of tests of monophyly of a certain taxon. The upper row indicates the main analyses that indicate paraphyly of genus 2 (G2), based on the Maximum Parsimony optimality criterion and non-parametric bootstrapping. Clade stability for a reclassified genus 2 (marked with a black circle, including species 2, 3, and 4), rises with increasing clade support in the main analysis (upper series of trees). Clade stability for this reclassified taxon furthermore depends on the congruence with a second analysis method (here as example, Bayesian inference, middle series of trees) and with a second, largely independent set of characters (lower series of trees). Note that the trees do not represent different reanalyses of the same data; each set of trees (I–VI) is just an example of which kind of evidence a researcher could face when deciding on reclassifying genera 1 and 2.
Notes
Files
figure.png
Files
(678.4 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:7552e0169978c3eb633bb249d42818f9
|
678.4 kB | Preview Download |
Linked records
Additional details
Related works
- Is part of
- Journal article: 10.11646/zootaxa.3636.2.1 (DOI)
- Journal article: urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FF9AFFA0ED35FF9EFFE54018FF8AFFB4 (LSID)
- Journal article: https://zenodo.org/record/5262429 (URL)