Bromus madritensis Linnaeus 1755
Authors/Creators
- 1. Botany Section, Research & Collections Services, Canadian Museum of Nature, PO Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, Ontario K 1 P 6 P 4, Canada; jsaarela @ mus-nature. ca & Author for correspondence
- 2. Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C., 20013 - 7012, U. S. A.; peterson @ si. edu
- 3. Botany Section, Research & Collections Services, Canadian Museum of Nature, PO Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, Ontario K 1 P 6 P 4, Canada; jsaarela @ mus-nature. ca & Departamento de Botanica, Univerisidad Autonoma Agraria " Antonio Narro " Buenavista, Saltillo, Coahuila 25315, MÉXICO; jvaldés @ uaaan. mx & Botany Section, Research & Collections Services, Canadian Museum of Nature, PO Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, Ontario K 1 P 6 P 4, Canada; jsaarela @ mus-nature. ca
Description
16. Bromus madritensis Linnaeus (1755: 5). Figs. 53, 54.
Anisantha madritensis (L.) Nevski (1934: 21). Festuca madritensis (L.) Desfontaines (1798: 91). Genea madritensis (L.) Dumortier (1868: 67). Zerna madritensis (L.) Gray (1821: 117). Type:— SPAIN. Manifesto prope Madritum, Loefling s.n. (neotype LINN-93.35!, designated by Smith 1985: 500).
Plants annual. Culms 10–75(–120) cm long, 0.5–1 mm wide at base, erect or ascending, glabrous below inflorescences; nodes 1–5, glabrous. Leaf sheaths glabrous or minutely pubescent, occassionally densely pubescent with hairs up to 0.5 mm long; ligules 1.5–4 mm long, glabrous, lacerate; blades 2–27 cm × 2–6 mm, flat, sometimes convolute, abaxial and adaxial surfaces glabrous to minutely pubescent, or densely pubescent, hairs up to 0.3 mm long, margins serrulate. Panicles 3–22 cm × 2.5–10 cm, loosely obovoid to oblong-ovoboid, erect, ± compact, sometimes reduced to a single spikelet, often purple, branches ascending to spreading, 0.2–5 cm long, usually shorter than spikelets, occassionally longer than spikelets, pubescent, most branches visible, shortest branch on lowest node 6–24 mm long, longest branch on lowest node branched 0–2 times, internodes reduced upwards. Spikelets 2.7–4.5 cm long (3–6.5 cm including awns), 4–13-flowered, linear-elliptic to cuneate, moderately laterally compressed, florets not overlapping at maturity; glumes glabrous, margins hyaline, 0.1–0.2 mm wide, midnerves glabrous proximally, scabrous distally, apices acute; lower glumes 6–11 mm long, narrowly lanceolate, 1-nerved, green to purple along nerve; upper glumes 10–17 mm long, lanceolate, 3-nerved, green to purple along and between nerves; lemmas 11–23 mm long, linear-lanceolate, rounded over the backs, apices bidentate, teeth 1–3 mm long, 5–7-nerved, green to purple along and between the nerves, glabrous or scabrous, margins hyaline, 0.2–0.4 mm wide; awns 12–30 mm long, inserted 1.5–4 mm below lemma apices, straight or arcuate, scabrous; paleas shorter and narrower than lemmas, backs glabrous or pubescent, keels ciliate, cilia 0.1–0.6 mm long; anthers 0.6–1.2 mm long; caryopses 8−11 mm long. 2 n = 4 x = 28 (Esnault 1984, Sánchez Anta et al. 1988, Sheidai & Fadaei 2005).
Distribution: ―Introduced. In México B. madritensis is known only from Baja California (Fig. 55). In the United States its range includes California, southern Oregon and Arizona (Pavlick et al. 2007). Native to the Mediterranean region and Central and Atlantic Europe (Sales 1994).
Ecology:— Open, xeric, mostly disturbed sites. Elevation: 20– 900 m.
Common Names: ―Foxtail chess, madrid brome, Spanish brome, compact brome (English).
Comments: ― Soderstrom & Beaman (1968) did not recognize B. madritensis in México, but it was treated by Gould & Moran (1981) for Baja California.
Bromus madritensis and B. rubens (sect. Genea) are part of the polymorphic B. madritensis complex, a group of morphologically similar taxa in which multiple taxa have been described (Scholz 1981, Sales 1993, Sales 1994). The complex is distinguished from other taxa in sect. Genea by a combination of small lemmas and erect, contracted to somewhat contracted inflorescences during flowering (Sales 1994). They have mostly been recognized as distinct species (Gould & Moran 1981), although their recognition as species has been questioned on the basis of considerable morphological variation (Esnault 1984, Esnault & Huon 1985, Sales 1993). Sales (1994) conducted a multivariate analysis of the polymorphic B. madritensis complex and accepted one species and two subspecies (B. madritensis subsp. madritensis and B. madritensis subsp. rubens). Some recent treatments have followed this circumscription (Jones et al. 1997, Saarela & Peterson 2012), whereas others have maintained the taxa as distinct species (Felger 2000, Aryavand 2002, Jessop et al. 2006, Pavlick & Anderton 2007).
Molecular studies have shed independent light on the evolutionary history of these taxa, informing their classification. Isozyme evidence suggests that the taxa have independent origins, in line with their recognition as species (Oja & Jaaska 1996, Oja 2002). Arecent study of plastid and nuclear ribosomal loci, and the Waxy gene, demonstrated that these two taxa are allopolyploids that arose independently from different diploid parental taxa: B. madritensis from a B. sterilis × B. fasciculatus Presl (1820: 39) cross, and B. rubens from a B. fasciculatus × B. tectorum cross (Fortune et al. 2008). In both taxa the maternal genome is derived from the B. fasciculatus lineage (Fortune et al. 2008). Given their independent origins, we treat these taxa as species, a classification that reflects their evolutionary history. The morphological variation in the complex globally may reflect multiple origins of these taxa or hybridization among them.
The character states related to pubescence of the culms, glumes and lemmas given in the key may not always distinguish B. madritensis and B. rubens, as these characters apparently vary in the complex and B. madritensis can sometimes be pubescent (Sales 1994), but they distinguish the species in México based on the specimens examined here.
Specimens Examined:― MÉXICO. Baja California: 25 km SE of Tijuana, at bottom of Cañón la Presa, 32.3958°N, 116.8333°W, 190 m, 13 May 1982, R. Moran 30700 (SD-111163); at roadside 1.5 km NE of Las Delicias, ca. 17 km Eof Ensenada, 31.9083°N, 116.425°W, 660 m, 20 May 1979, R. Moran 27265 (SD-102443); between La Humarosa [Rumarosa] and Tecate, 32.53°N, 116.38°W, 27 April 1981, A.A. Beetle & R. Alcaraz M-6745 (ARIZ-229626, MICH-1119160, MEXU); Guadalupe Island, Sslope of cañon above NE Anchorage, 29.1542°N, 118.2833°W, 20 m, 14 February 1957, R. Moran 5688 (SD-47529); La Flor de Sol, 32.425°N, 116.95°W, 220 m, 22 June 1977, R. Moran 24273 (SD-97340); La Misión, between Ensenada and Tijuana, on steep slopes and in arroyo bottom along Sside of river, 32.0936°N, 116.8694°W, 50 m, 18 April 1998, J. Rebman, P. Flanagan & La Misión Community Group 5046 (RSA-POM-643071, SD-144705, SD-144706); Rancho ontiveros, Sern foothills of Otay Mountain just Sof the US/MEX border between Tijuana and Tecate, along a side canyon of the Río Tecate just W of the MEX Hwy. 2 toll booth, 32.5461°N, 116.8544°W, 85 m, 26 April 2005, J. Rebman, J. Delgadillo, M. White & K. Comer 11830 (SD-161420); San Carlos Canyon, Sof Ensenada, [31.87°N, 116.59°W], 29 April 1981, A.A. Beetle & R. Alcaraz M 6600 (MEXU); San Isidoro, 30.7667°N, 115.5333°W, 900 m, 2 June 1975, R. Moran 22257 (SD-91369); Descando Valley, 32.1833°N, 116.8667°W, 15 m, 29 April 1972, R. Moran 19110 (MEXU, SD-83045).
Notes
Files
Files
(8.2 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:96e3f37e16895cb9333dbd087d9dc861
|
8.2 kB | Download |
System files
(64.9 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:bbcbe8f128c7c13e61925ee06cdc6fef
|
64.9 kB | Download |
Linked records
Additional details
Identifiers
Biodiversity
- Collection code
- A , E, R , J , K , M , MEXU , MEXU, R , MEXU, S , NE , P , R , S , S, A , SD , W
- Material sample ID
- ARIZ-229626, MICH-1119160 , M 6600 , RSA-POM-643071, SD-144705, SD-144706 , SD-102443 , SD-111163 , SD-161420 , SD-47529 , SD-83045 , SD-91369 , SD-97340
- Event date
- 1957-02-14 , 1972-04-29 , 1975-06-02 , 1977-06-22 , 1979-05-20 , 1981-04-27 , 1981-04-29 , 1982-05-13 , 1998-04-18 , 2005-04-26
- Verbatim event date
- 1957-02-14 , 1972-04-29 , 1975-06-02 , 1977-06-22 , 1979-05-20 , 1981-04-27 , 1981-04-29 , 1982-05-13 , 1998-04-18 , 2005-04-26
- Scientific name authorship
- Linnaeus
- Kingdom
- Plantae
- Phylum
- Tracheophyta
- Order
- Poales
- Family
- Poaceae
- Genus
- Bromus
- Species
- madritensis
- Taxon rank
- species
- Taxonomic concept label
- Bromus madritensis Linnaeus, 1755 sec. Saarela, Peterson & Valdés-Reyna, 2014
References
- Linnaeus, C. (1755) A. D. J. Centuria I. plantarum, quam, ex consens. nobil. et exper. Fac. med. in Regia Academia Upsaliensi, sub praesidio, Caroli Linnaei, orbi botanico examinandam sistit, Abraham. D. Juslenius, V-Gothus. Exc. L. M. Hojer, Reg.
- Nevski, S. A. (1934) Schedae ad Herbarium Florae Asiae Mediae ab Universitate Asiae Mediae editum. Trudy Sredne- Aziatskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriya 8 b, Botanika 17: 1 - 94.
- Desfontaines, R. L. (1798) Flora Atlantica: sive historia plantarum quae in Atlante, agro tunetano et algeriensi crescunt 1. L. G. Desgranges, Paris, 261 pp. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 323
- Dumortier, B. C. (1868) Classification des Graminees. Bulletin de la Societe Royale de Botanique de Belgique 7: 60 - 70.
- Gray, S. F. (1821) A natural arrangement of British plants, according to their relations to each other as pointed out by Jussieu, De Candolle, Brown, & c. including those cultivated for use; with an introduction to botany, in which the terms newly introduced are explained; illustrated by figures 2. Baldwin, Cradock, and Joy, London, 757 pp. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 43804
- Smith, P. M. (1985) Observations on Turkish brome-grasses. I. Some new taxa, new combinations and notes on typification. Notes from the Royal Botanical Garden, Edinburgh 42: 491 - 501.
- Esnault, M. - A. (1984) Etudes sur la variabilite morphologique de Bromus madritensis. Phytomorphology 34: 91 - 99.
- Sanchez Anta, M. A., Gallego Martin, F. & Navarro Andres, F. (1988) Aspectos anatomicos de la epidermis de algunas especies subnitrofilas de Bromus L. y su cariologia. Acta Botanica Barcinonensia 37: 335 - 344.
- Sheidai, M. & Fadaei, F. (2005) Cytogenetic studies in some species of Bromus L., section Genea Dum. Journal of Genetics 84: 189 - 194.
- Pavlick, L. E. & Anderton, L. K. (2007) Bromus L. In: Barkworth, M. E., Capels, K. M., Long, S., Anderton, L. K. & Piep, M. B. (Eds.) Flora of North America, Volume 24. Magnoliophyta: Commelinidae (in part): Poaceae, part 1. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York, pp. 193 - 237.
- Sales, F. (1994) A reassessment of the Bromus madritensis complex (Poaceae): a multivariate approach. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences 42: 245 - 255. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1080 / 07929978.1994.10676577
- Soderstrom, T. R. & Beaman, J. H. (1968) The genus Bromus (Gramineae) in Mexico and Central America. Publications of the Museum, Michigan State University, Biological Series 3: 465 - 520.
- Gould, F. W. & Moran, R. (1981) The grasses of Baja California, Mexico. Memoirs of the San Diego Society of Natural History 12: 1 - 140.
- Scholz, H. (1981) Bemerkungen uber Bromus madritensis und B. rubens (Gramineae). Willdenowia 11: 249 - 258.
- Sales, F. (1993) Taxonomy and nomenclature of Bromus sect. Genea. Edinburgh Journal of Botany 50: 1 - 31. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1017 / S 0960428600000627
- Esnault, M. A. & Huon, A. (1985) Application de methodes numeriques a la systematique du genre Bromus L. sect. Genea Dumort. Bulletin de la Societe Linneenne de Provence 37: 69 - 77.
- Jones, S. D., Wipff, J. K. & Montgomery, P. M. (1997) Vascular plants of Texas: a comprehensive checklist including synonymy, bibliography and index. University of Texas Press, Austin, 404 pp.
- Saarela, J. M. & Peterson, P. M. (2012) Bromus. In: Baldwin, B. G., Boyd, S., Ertter, B. J., Patterson, R. W., Rosatti, T. J. & Wilken, D. H. (Eds.) The Second Edition of the Jepson Manual. University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles and London, pp. 1426 - 1431, 1435.
- Felger, R. S. (2000) Flora of the Gran Desierto and Rio Colorado of Northwestern Mexico. University of Arizona Press, [Tucson], 673 pp.
- Aryavand, A. (2002) Phenetic analysis of the Iranian species of the Bromus sections Genea, Neobromus and Nevskiella. Journal of Sciences, Islamic Republic of Iran 13: 3 - 14.
- Jessop, J. P., Dashorst, G. R. M. & James, F. M. (2006) Grasses of South Australia: An illustrated guide to the native and naturalised species. Wakefield Press, Kent Town, S. Aust., 554 pp.
- Oja, T. & Jaaska, V. (1996) Isoenzyme data on the genetic divergence and allopolyploidy in the section Genea of the grass genus Bromus (Poaceae). Hereditas 125: 249 - 255. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1601 - 5223.1996.00249. x
- Oja, T. (2002) Genetic divergence and interspecific differentiation in the Bromus madritensis complex (Poaceae) based on isozyme data. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 30: 433 - 449. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1016 / S 0305 - 1978 (01) 00114 - 4
- Presl, C. B. (1820) Cyperaceae et Gramineae siculae. apud D. Hartmann, Pragae, 58 pp.
- Fortune, P. M., Pourtau, N., Viron, N. & Ainouche, M. L. (2008) Molecular phylogeny and reticulate origins of the polyploid Bromus species from section Genea (Poaceae). American Journal of Botany 95: 454 - 464. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.3732 / ajb. 95.4.454