Published December 31, 2013 | Version v1
Figure Open

FIGURE 3 in Why is Synedra berolinensis so hard to classify? More on monotypic taxa

Authors/Creators

Description

FIGURE 3. Hypothetical tree (classification) of 12 species with 7 nodes (0–6). See Table 5 and text. Node 1 suggests there is evidence to support a group E–L to the exclusion of A–D; that there is evidence to support a group E–H to the exclusion of A–D and I–L; that there is evidence to support a group E–F to the exclusion of A–D and G–L, etc., through all nodes 4–6. The assignment of taxonomic level is not particularly important (see Table 5, for an example), only the monophyly of each: data, relationships and the classification hierarchy are isomorphic.

Notes

Published as part of Williams, David M., 2013, Why is Synedra berolinensis so hard to classify? More on monotypic taxa, pp. 113-127 in Phytotaxa 127 (1) on page 120, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.127.1.13, http://zenodo.org/record/5085330

Files

figure.png

Files (37.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:9cd955d34ee75f263a427617615240fe
26.4 kB Preview Download
md5:7f99784c3b2bbb3cb07079e2f445b323
11.2 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Related works

Is cited by
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/B30C340DD94BEB3657FCA56BFE62FAE5 (URL)
Is part of
Journal article: 10.11646/phytotaxa.127.1.13 (DOI)
Journal article: urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:4F354C75D94AEB33576BA60EFF80FFDF (LSID)
Journal article: http://publication.plazi.org/id/4F354C75D94AEB33576BA60EFF80FFDF (URL)
Journal article: https://zenodo.org/record/5085330 (URL)