Published December 31, 2013
| Version v1
Figure
Open
FIGURE 3 in Why is Synedra berolinensis so hard to classify? More on monotypic taxa
Authors/Creators
Description
FIGURE 3. Hypothetical tree (classification) of 12 species with 7 nodes (0–6). See Table 5 and text. Node 1 suggests there is evidence to support a group E–L to the exclusion of A–D; that there is evidence to support a group E–H to the exclusion of A–D and I–L; that there is evidence to support a group E–F to the exclusion of A–D and G–L, etc., through all nodes 4–6. The assignment of taxonomic level is not particularly important (see Table 5, for an example), only the monophyly of each: data, relationships and the classification hierarchy are isomorphic.
Notes
Files
figure.png
Files
(37.5 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:9cd955d34ee75f263a427617615240fe
|
26.4 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:7f99784c3b2bbb3cb07079e2f445b323
|
11.2 kB | Download |
Linked records
Additional details
Related works
- Is cited by
- Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/B30C340DD94BEB3657FCA56BFE62FAE5 (URL)
- Is part of
- Journal article: 10.11646/phytotaxa.127.1.13 (DOI)
- Journal article: urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:4F354C75D94AEB33576BA60EFF80FFDF (LSID)
- Journal article: http://publication.plazi.org/id/4F354C75D94AEB33576BA60EFF80FFDF (URL)
- Journal article: https://zenodo.org/record/5085330 (URL)