Published July 31, 2016 | Version v1

Data from: Thermal and moisture habitat preferences do not maximize jumping performance in frogs

  • 1. Clark University

Description

Amphibians are suffering population declines globally, and understanding how environmental parameters influence their thermal and moisture preferences and performance at various tasks is crucial to understanding how these animals will be influenced by climate change. Body temperature and hydration affect organismal performance at many fitness-related tasks. Since amphibians are ectotherms with highly water-permeable skin, environmental temperature and moisture directly affect their body temperature and hydration. Therefore, amphibians should select habitats with the optimal combination of temperature and moisture to perform tasks necessary for survival. However, interactions between environmental temperature and moisture can influence habitat selection and task performance in different and often unpredictable ways, and this has only infrequently been considered. We tested for interactions between environmental temperature, moisture, and organismal hydration on temperature and moisture preferences and jumping performance in Green Frogs (Lithobates clamitans) in the laboratory, using thermal and moisture gradients, and high-speed video and force plate data. We then integrated the lab experiments with field data. In the thermal and moisture gradients, frogs selected environmental conditions that minimized cutaneous evaporative water loss, hydroregulating more stringently than thermoregulating. These results are consistent with frogs in the field, which had highly variable body temperatures, but were always hydrated above 95% of their standard mass. However, conditions that minimized evaporative water loss frequently did not maximize jumping performance because warmer temperatures conferred greater performance. The ecology of L. clamitans may explain the discrepancy between their preferences and jumping performance optima because the frogs remain in wet environments that serve as refuges from dehydration. In parts of their range where frogs are subjected to warmer and drier conditions, they are likely to select microhabitats that minimize the risk of dehydration, possibly at the expense of their ability to forage and escape from predators.

Notes

Files

Mitchell and Bergmann Field Data.csv

Files (20.1 kB)

Name Size
md5:083236015952c7564172fd839d472977
3.5 kB Preview Download
md5:0d2184c0485a3418af9d2ea796ed402c
5.6 kB Preview Download
md5:e49d9205f03b226af9854f8ed66b2d5a
157 Bytes Preview Download
md5:73a52cf1458827ac96431678652a8563
3.5 kB Preview Download
md5:26c9551b0749984b50a2c8b74b570f1b
125 Bytes Preview Download
md5:e316845f973d7ddfc5f19820a52c3486
1.9 kB Preview Download
md5:aea871ee9296a3ddf01c8586f21c1402
696 Bytes Preview Download
md5:cf99f4ee56c1720f7038947d07d76589
1.0 kB Preview Download
md5:10bc30fb795129bcea18941485100a8a
1.2 kB Preview Download
md5:3e69fc718964867d2b612a5a53d6e6f7
918 Bytes Preview Download
md5:fcf73b856141759682ffeefa4f57a8e1
933 Bytes Preview Download
md5:413ff72d9de6d424fe56a392744a2ff7
727 Bytes Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is cited by
10.1111/1365-2435.12535 (DOI)