Published June 23, 2021 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Plant dispersal syndromes are unreliable as predictors of zoochory and long-distance dispersal by ungulates and waterbirds

  • 1. Estación Biológica de Doñana
  • 2. National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and Environment
  • 3. Danube Research Institute

Description

Plant dispersal syndromes are allocated based on diaspore morphology and used to predict mechanisms of dispersal. Many authors assume that only angiosperms with endozoochory, epizoochory or anemochory syndromes have a long-distance dispersal (LDD) mechanism. Too much faith is often placed in classical syndromes to explain historical dispersal events and to predict future ones. The "endozoochory syndrome" is actually a "frugivory syndrome" and has often diverted attention from endozoochory by non-frugivores (e.g. waterbirds and large herbivores) that disperse a broad range of angiosperms, for which they likely provide the maximum dispersal distances. Neither the endozoochory nor the epizoochory syndromes provide helpful predictions of which plants non-frugivores disperse, or by which mechanism. We combined data from Albert et al. (2015a), Soons et al. (2016) and Julve (1998) to show that only 4% of European plant species dispersed by ungulate endozoochory belong to the corresponding syndrome, compared to 36% for ungulate epizoochory and 8% for endozoochory by migratory ducks. In contrast, the proportions of these species that are assigned to an "unassisted syndrome" are 37%, 31% and 28%, respectively. Since allocated syndromes do not adequately account for zoochory, empirical studies often fail to find the expected relationship between syndromes and LDD events such as those underlying the colonization of islands or latitudinal migration. We need full incorporation of existing zoochory data into dispersal databases, and more empirical research into the relationship between plant traits and the frequency and effectiveness of different dispersal mechanisms (paying attention to unexpected vectors). Acknowledging the broad role of non-frugivores in facilitating LDD is crucial to improve predictions of the consequences of global change, such as how plant distributions respond to climate change, and how alien plants spread. Networks of dispersal interactions between these vertebrates and plants are a vital but understudied part of the Web of Life. The datasets we present here illustrate these limitations of syndromes, and include data from Brochet et al. (2010) regarding the syndromes of plants dispersed by Eurasian Teal via epizoochory or endozoochory.

Notes

There are missing values when a plant species that appears in the seed dispersal datasets of Soons et al., Brochet et al. or Albert et al. is not listed in the trait database Baseflor.

See the ReadMe sheet within the Excel file for all other information

Funding provided by: Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100011033
Award Number: CGL2016-76067-P

Funding provided by: Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003825
Award Number: ÚNKP‐20‐5‐DE‐225

Funding provided by: Ministry of Technology, Innovation and Citizens' Services
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100005615
Award Number: NKFIH OTKA FK‐127939

Files

Files (65.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:a0b52dad53ce44cfd4ecabf66bf4253b
65.6 kB Download