Published October 17, 2014 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Data from: Quantifying inbreeding avoidance through extra-pair reproduction

  • 1. University of Aberdeen
  • 2. University of British Columbia
  • 3. University of Zurich

Description

Extra-pair reproduction is widely hypothesised to allow females to avoid inbreeding with related socially-paired males. Consequently, numerous field studies have tested the key predictions that extra-pair offspring are less inbred than females' alternative within-pair offspring, and that the probability of extra-pair reproduction increases with a female's relatedness to her socially-paired male. However such studies rarely measure inbreeding or relatedness sufficiently precisely to detect subtle effects, or consider biases stemming from failure to observe inbred offspring that die during early development. Analyses of multi-generational song sparrow (Melospiza melodia) pedigree data showed that most females had opportunity to increase or decrease the coefficient of inbreeding of their offspring through extra-pair reproduction with neighbouring males. In practice, observed extra-pair offspring had lower inbreeding coefficients than females' within-pair offspring on average, while the probability of extra-pair reproduction increased substantially with the coefficient of kinship between a female and her socially-paired male. However, simulations showed that such effects could simply reflect bias stemming from inbreeding depression in early offspring survival. The null hypothesis that extra-pair reproduction is random with respect to kinship therefore cannot be definitively rejected in song sparrows, and existing general evidence that females avoid inbreeding through extra-pair reproduction requires re-evaluation given such biases.

Notes

Files

breed.data.dryad.use.txt

Files (417.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:b48e0b5adff19d15a8313f80926e5fa6
8.7 kB Preview Download
md5:6248b5e3ce836ef4cd19b35bf3f04869
10.8 kB Preview Download
md5:15b08cc51e9489f0433accb3b71b6002
11.4 kB Preview Download
md5:de17f8a190fa90f61a0924d0cf4eff56
36.3 kB Preview Download
md5:5e5f6bcf09cf126fae86379f7f2ffa0c
222.2 kB Preview Download
md5:466bcd9f6068bf526ab4178ef177bcf5
36.4 kB Preview Download
md5:05af0208aacb40750121fbfa437c2c3b
34.4 kB Preview Download
md5:9658dbb63a7401613f0df34d76698f17
7.3 kB Preview Download
md5:ff2f6fae046707fe974d113cc770da8f
2.2 kB Preview Download
md5:ff2f6fae046707fe974d113cc770da8f
2.2 kB Preview Download
md5:ff2f6fae046707fe974d113cc770da8f
2.2 kB Preview Download
md5:ff2f6fae046707fe974d113cc770da8f
2.2 kB Preview Download
md5:ff2f6fae046707fe974d113cc770da8f
2.2 kB Preview Download
md5:ff2f6fae046707fe974d113cc770da8f
2.2 kB Preview Download
md5:ff2f6fae046707fe974d113cc770da8f
2.2 kB Preview Download
md5:ff2f6fae046707fe974d113cc770da8f
2.2 kB Preview Download
md5:ff2f6fae046707fe974d113cc770da8f
2.2 kB Preview Download
md5:bd953d7ef59d9f22450538f7805cf59d
30.8 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is cited by
10.1111/evo.12557 (DOI)