Published February 23, 2021 | Version 1
Journal article Open

Classification and peculiarities of the use of urgent instruments of crisis management of enterprises

Authors/Creators

Description

This article discusses the problem of classification and features of the use of urgent instruments of crisis management of enterprises. As a result of this research, the article provides a classification of such tools on a number of classification criteria: existing (source of origin, place in the management system, cost, the scale of changes envisaged in respect of the object, orientation, types of activities addressed by the tools, the conditions of formation and use, key objectives, coverage, subjective composition of the executors) and new (content, level of novelty for the business environment, the level of individualization for the enterprise, the level of formalization of the tool).

Developed classification of urgent crisis management tools deepens understanding of such tools, provides their integrity, as well as specifies processes and driving forces of elimination or reduction of negative influence of crisis phenomena on economic situation of enterprise and provision of its further effective development. The classification will help managers at various management levels in the enterprises to understand from which positions and in which directions they can urgently influence the overcoming of crisis phenomena in their organizations.

Files

100.pdf

Files (378.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:0c66622726aff481459b4de2096a3a6f
378.3 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • 1. Pierścionek, Z. (2011). Zarządzanie strategiczne w przedsiębiorstwie. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN [in Polish].
  • 2. Kolishсhuk, О. (2018). Analysis of innovation classifications by degree of novelty. Ekonomika kharchovoji promyslovosti, 10 (3), 57-65 [in Ukrainian].
  • 3. Syrotynska, N. (2012). Types of innovative industrial enterprises. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu "Lvivska politekhnika". Seriia "Menedzhment ta pidpryiemnytstvo v Ukraini: etapy stanovlennia i problemy rozvytku", 727, 314-319 [in Ukrainian].
  • 4. Bilous-Serhieieva, S. & Mashtakova, O. (2018). Exploring 'hard' and 'soft' approaches to total quality management. Teoretychni i praktychni aspekty ekonomiky ta intelektualnoi vlasnosti, 18, 136-142 [in Ukrainian].
  • 5. Hordiienko, O.O. (2017). Soft management: conceptualising modernity. Hileia: naukovyi visnyk, 122, 196-199 [in Ukrainian].
  • 6. Korviakov, V. (2015). Statement of cash flows: Theory and practice. Visnyk MSFZ, 15 [in Ukrainian].
  • 7. Certainty conditions. Retrieved from: https://economy-ru.info/info/95808/ [in Russian].
  • 8. Avramenko, V.P., Tkachenko, V.F. & Sereda, L.B. (2010). Management decision-making under conditions of uncertainty and unclear background information. Radioelektronika, informatyka, upravlinnia, 2, 101-106 [in Ukrainian].
  • 9. Pankin, А. (2002). Formalising management in the organisation: improving organisational effectiveness through organisational change. Menedzhment segodnja, 3, 44-49 [in Russian].
  • 10. Matorin, S.I. & Mihelev, M.V. (2009). Formalisation of process models based on the PI calculus. Nauchnye vedomosti BelGU. Ser. Istorija. Politologija. Jekonomika. Informatika, 9 (11/1), 165-169 [in Russian].
  • 11. Capital and running costs. Retrieved from: http://consulting.ru/econs_art_342007969.