A self-training program for sensory substitution devices
Authors/Creators
- 1. The Baruch Ivcher Institute For Brain, Cognition & Technology, The Baruch Ivcher School of Psychology, Interdisciplinary Center (IDC), Herzeliya, Israel
- 2. Center of Advanced Technologies in Rehabilitation (CATR), The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
- 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ben Gurion University, Beersheba, Israel
- 4. Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
- 5. The Baruch Ivcher Institute For Brain, Cognition & Technology, The Baruch Ivcher School of Psychology, Interdisciplinary Center (IDC), Herzeliya, Israel,
Description
Sensory Substitution Devices (SSDs) convey visual information through audition or touch,
targeting blind and visually impaired individuals. One bottleneck towards adopting SSDs in
everyday life by blind users, is the constant dependency on sighted instructors throughout
the learning process. Here, we present a proof-of-concept for the efficacy of an online selftraining
program developed for learning the basics of the EyeMusic visual-to-auditory SSD
tested on sighted blindfolded participants. Additionally, aiming to identify the best training
strategy to be later re-adapted for the blind, we compared multisensory vs. unisensory as
well as perceptual vs. descriptive feedback approaches. To these aims, sighted participants
performed identical SSD-stimuli identification tests before and after ~75 minutes of selftraining
on the EyeMusic algorithm. Participants were divided into five groups, differing by
the feedback delivered during training: auditory-descriptive, audio-visual textual description,
audio-visual perceptual simultaneous and interleaved, and a control group which had no
training. At baseline, before any EyeMusic training, participants SSD objects’ identification
was significantly above chance, highlighting the algorithm’s intuitiveness. Furthermore, selftraining
led to a significant improvement in accuracy between pre- and post-training tests in
each of the four feedback groups versus control, though no significant difference emerged
among those groups. Nonetheless, significant correlations between individual post-training
success rates and various learning measures acquired during training, suggest a trend for
an advantage of multisensory vs. unisensory feedback strategies, while no trend emerged
for perceptual vs. descriptive strategies. The success at baseline strengthens the conclusion
that cross-modal correspondences facilitate learning, given SSD algorithms are based
on such correspondences. Additionally, and crucially, the results highlight the feasibility of
self-training for the first stages of SSD learning, and suggest that for these initial stages, unisensory
training, easily implemented also for blind and visually impaired individuals, may
suffice. Together, these findings will potentially boost the use of SSDs for rehabilitation.
Files
A self-training program for sensory substitution devices.pdf
Files
(1.8 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:56bf2089c96b7e95f315758959cdadc1
|
1.8 MB | Preview Download |