Published December 20, 2016 | Version v1

The Flow of Time in the Theory of Relativity

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Spain

Description

According to Dennis Dieks, in the theory of relativity, the «flow of time» results from the succession of events along time-like worldlines.  We have a flow of time per worldline. This leads to a view of now as local to each worldline. In this approach there is no global temporal order of the now-points of different worldlines. For a consistency reason it is imposed a limitation on the assignment of different now-points. Here it is made the claim that this consistency requirement is inbuilt in the theory, and it is presented a detailed analysis of this approach.

Files

2016 Bacelar Time.pdf

Files (585.1 kB)

Name Size
md5:dcfaadd426b966fb49f9981d0675c394
585.1 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Anderson, Ronald; Vetharaniam, I., and Stedman, Geoffrey E. (1998). «Conventionality of synchronization, gauge dependence and test theories of relativity». Physics Reports 295: pp. 93–180. doi: 10.1016/S0370-1573(97)00051-3
  • Arthur, Richard T. W. (2006). «Minkowski spacetime and the dimensions of the present». In: The ontology of spacetime, edited by Dennis Dieks. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 129–155. doi: 10.1016/S1871-1774(06)01007-2
  • Arthur, Richard T.W. (2008). «Time lapse and the degeneracy of time: Gödel, proper time and becoming in relativity theory». In: The ontology of spacetime II, edited by Dennis Dieks. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 207–227. doi: 10.1016/S1871-1774(08)00011-9
  • Barbour, Julian (1989). The discovery of dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bohm, David (1996 [1965]). The special theory of relativity. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Bondi, Hermann (1965). Relativity and common sense. A new approach to Einstein. London: Heinemann.
  • Brown, Harvey (2005). Physical relativity: Spacetime structure from a dynamical perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/0199275831.001.0001
  • Callahan, James (2000). The geometry of spacetime: an introduction to special and general relativity. New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-6736-0
  • Darrigol, Olivier (2005). «The genesis of the theory of relativity». In: Einstein, 1905–2005, edited by Thibault Damour, Olivier Darrigol, Bertrand Duplantier and Vincent Rivasseau. Basel: Birkhäuser. doi: 10.1007/3-7643-7436-5_1
  • Dieks, Dennis (1988). «Special relativity and the flow of time». Philosophy of Science 55: 456–60. doi: 10.1086/289452
  • Dieks, Dennis (2006). «Becoming, relativity and locality». In: The ontology of spacetime, edited by Dennis Dieks. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 157–176. doi: 10.1016/S1871-1774(06)01008-4
  • Disalle, Robert (2009). «Space and time: Inertial frames». In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. (Winter 2009 Edition). Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved online in November 2013. URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/spacetime-iframes/
  • Dorato, Mauro (2008). «Putnam on time and special relativity: a long journey from ontology to ethics». European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 4: pp. 51–70.
  • Dorato, Mauro (2010). «Should we represent the present in Minkowski spacetime?» PhilSci Archive. URL = http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/5096/
  • Dorato, Mauro (2011). «The Alexandroff present and Minkowski spacetime: why it cannot do what it has been asked to do». In: Explanation, prediction, and confirmation: the philosophy of science in a European perspective vol. 2, edited by Dennis Dieks, Wenceslao J. Gonzalez, Stephan Hartmann, Thomas Uebel, and Marcel Weber. New York: Springer, pp 379–394. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-1180-8_26
  • Einstein, Albert (1993 [1910]). «The principle of relativity and its consequences in modern physics». In: The collected papers of Albert Einstein (English translation), Vol. 3, edited by Martin J. Klein, A. J. Kox, Jürgen Renn, and Robert Schulman. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 117–142.
  • Einstein, Albert (1997 [1955]). The meaning of relativity. Sixth edition. ElecBook: London.
  • Fock, Vladimir (1959). The theory of space, time, and gravitation. New York: Pergamon Press.
  • Friedman, Michael (1983). Foundations of space–time theories: relativistic physics and philosophy of science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Gödel, Kurt (1949). «A remark about the relationship between relativity and idealistic philosophy». In: Albert Einstein: Philosopher–Scientist, edited by Paul Arthur Schilpp. La Salle: Open Court, pp 557–62.
  • Grunbaum, Adolf (1955). «Logical and philosophical foundations of the special theory of relativity». American Journal of Physics 23: pp. 450–464. doi: 10.1119/1.1934047
  • Jammer, Max (2006). Concepts of simultaneity. From antiquity to Einstein and beyond. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Ludvigsen, Malcolm (1999). General relativity: a geometric approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511755774
  • Misner, Charles W., thorne, Kip S., and wheeler, John Archibald (1973). Gravitation. New York: W. H. Freeman & Company.
  • Møller, Christian (1955 [1952]). The theory of relativity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Paty, Michel (2007 [1992]). «Physical geometry and special relativity: Einstein and Poincaré». In: 1830–1930 : un siècle de géométrie, de C.F. Gauss et B. Riemann à H. Poincaré et E. Cartan. Epistémologie, histoire et mathématiques, edited by L. Boi, D. flament et J.–M. Salanski. Springer: Berlin, pp. 126–149. Retrieved from Halshs.archives-ouvertes. URL = https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00167113/
  • Petkov, Vesselin (2005). Relativity and the Nature of Spacetime. Berlin: Springer.
  • Petkov, Vesselin (2009). «Relativity and the dimensionality of the world: spacetime is real». In: Relativity and the nature of spacetime, edited by Vesselin Petkov. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer, pp. 121–152. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-01962-3_5
  • Savitt, Steven (2006). «Presentism and eternalism in perpective». In: The ontology of spacetime, edited by Dennis Dieks. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 111–127. doi: 10.1016/S1871-1774(06)01006-0
  • Savitt, Steven (2009). «The transient nows». In: Quantum reality, relativistic causality, and closing the epistemic circle: essays in honour of Abner Shimony, edited by Wayne C. Myrvold and Joy Christian. Berlin: Springer, pp 339–352. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9107-0_18
  • Savitt, Steven (2011). How fast time passes. PhilSci–archive. URL = http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/8737/
  • Savitt, Steven (2013). «Being and becoming in modern physics». In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. (Summer 2014 Edition). Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved online in November 2015. URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/spacetime-bebecome/
  • Schutz, Bernard F. (1985). A first course in general relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Smith, James H. (1993 [1965]). Introduction to special relativity. New York: Dover Publications.
  • Torretti, Roberto (1983). Relativity and geometry. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  • Wheeler, John Archibald, and taylor, Edwin (1963). Spacetime physics. San Fransisco: Freeman.
  • Zhang, Yuan Zhong (1997). Special relativity and its experimental foundations. Singapore: World Scientific. doi: 10.1142/3180