Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published March 31, 2008 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Acoustic signals, species diagnosis, and species concepts: the case of a new cryptic species of Leptodactylus (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae) from the Chapare region, Bolivia

Authors/Creators

Description

Angulo, Ariadne, Reichle, Steffen (2008): Acoustic signals, species diagnosis, and species concepts: the case of a new cryptic species of Leptodactylus (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae) from the Chapare region, Bolivia. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 152 (3): 59-77, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2008.00447.x, URL: https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article-lookup/doi/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2008.00447.x

Files

source.pdf

Files (438.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:9d39cdae94adb2f6c67232f0d74a523c
438.6 kB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

URL
https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/3192
LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:9D39FFAEFFADFFF6C672FFF0D74A523C
URL
http://publication.plazi.org/id/9D39FFAEFFADFFF6C672FFF0D74A523C

Cites
Publication: 10.1002/mmnz.200600027 (DOI)
Has part
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.5747088 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/610087D6FFAEFFFEC6A5F948D6E554EB (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.4687665 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.4687667 (DOI)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/BDD66648FFA8FFF3C548FF36D2CE52C4 (URL)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/BDD66648FFABFFF0C6E2FF36D45652C4 (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.4687669 (DOI)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/BDD66648FFA4FFFFC6FDFE67D586501F (URL)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/BDD66648FFA6FFFDC6FDFDDFD12D505F (URL)
Is source of
Dataset: https://www.gbif.org/dataset/a85e8f06-95fa-467d-8d09-c49f593271a3 (URL)

References

  • Almeida AP, Angulo A. 2006. A new species of Leptodactylus (Anura: Leptodactylidae) from the state of Espirito Santo, Brazil, with remarks on the systematics of associated populations. Zootaxa 1334: 1-25.
  • AmphibiaWeb. 2007. Information on amphibian biology and conservation. Berkeley, CA: AmphibiaWeb. Available at http://amphibiaweb.org/
  • Angulo A. 2004. The evolution of the acoustic communication system in members of the genus Adenomera (Anura: Leptodactylidae): a comparative approach. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Toronto.
  • Angulo A, Cocroft RB, Reichle S. 2003. Species identity in the genus Adenomera (Anura: Leptodactylidae) in southeastern Peru. Herpetologica 59: 490-504.
  • Angulo A, Icochea J. 2003. Adenomera cf. andreae (NCN). Vocalization. Herpetological Review 34: 47-48.
  • Angulo A, Massary J-C (de), Boistel R. 2006. Addenda and errata to 'Description of a new species of the genus Adenomera (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae) from French Guinea'. Acta Herpetologica 1: 159-162.
  • Baker MC. 2006. Differentiation of mating vocalizations in birds: Acoustic features in mainland and island populations and evidence of habitat-dependent selection on songs. Ethology 112: 757-771.
  • Barrio A. 1964. Importancia, significacion y analisis del canto de batracios anuros. Publicacion conmemorativa del Cincuentenario del Museo Provincial de Ciencias Naturales 'Florentino Ameghino', 51-79.
  • Bickford D, Lohman DJ, Sodhi NS, Ng PKL, Meier R, Winker K, Ingram KK, Das I. 2007. Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22: 148-155.
  • Blair WF. 1964. Isolating mechanisms and interspecies interactions in anuran amphibians. Quarterly Review of Biology 39: 334-344.
  • Blair WF. 1974. Character displacement in frogs. American Zoologist 14: 1119-1125.
  • Boettger O. 1885. Liste von Reptilien und Batrachiern aus Paraguay. Zeitschrift fur Naturwissenschaft 58: 1-36.
  • Boistel R, Massary J-C (de), Angulo A. 2006. Description of a new species of the genus Adenomera (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae) from French Guiana. Acta Herpetologica 1: 1-14.
  • Bokermann WCA. 1956. Sobre una nueva especie de Leptodactylus del Brasil (Amphibia). Neotropica 2: 37-40.
  • Brown RM, Richards SJ, Sukumaran J, Foufopoulos J. 2006. A new morphologically cryptic species of forest frog (genus Platymantis) from New Britain Island, Bismarck Archipelago. Zootaxa 1334: 45-68.
  • Cocroft RB, Ryan MJ. 1995. Patterns of advertisement call evolution in toads and chorus frogs. Animal Behaviour 49: 283-303.
  • Cope ED. 1868. An examination of the Reptilia and Batrachia obtained by the Orton Expedition to Equador and the Upper Amazon, with notes on other species. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 1868: 96-140.
  • Cuervo AM, Cadena CD, Krabbe N, Renjifo LM. 2005. Scytalopus stilesi, a new species of tapaculo (Rhinocryptidae) from the Cordillera Central of Colombia. Auk 122: 445-463.
  • Dawood A, Channing A, Bogart JP. 2002. A molecular phylogeny of the frog genus Tomopterna in southern Africa: Examining species boundaries with mitochondrial 12S rRNA sequence data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 22: 407-413.
  • De la Riva I. 1996. The specific name of Adenomera (Anura: Leptodactylidae) in the Paraguay River Basin. Journal of Herpetology 30: 556-557.
  • De la Riva I, Kohler J, Lotters S, Reichle S. 2000. Ten years of research on Bolivian amphibians: updated checklist, distribution, taxonomic problems, literature and iconography. Revista Espanola de Herpetologia 14: 19-164.
  • Dillon S, Fjeldsa J. 2005. The implications of different species concepts for describing biodiversity patterns and assessing conservation needs for African birds. Ecography 28: 682-692.
  • DSP Development Corporation. 1999. DADiSP, Version 4.1. Cambridge, MA.
  • Duellman WE. 2005. Cusco Amazonico: the lives of amphibians and reptiles in an Amazonian rainforest. Ithaca: Comstock Publishing Associates, Cornell University Press.
  • Ewing AW. 1989. Arthropod bioacoustics: neurobiology and behaviour. Ithaca: Comstock Publishing Associates, Cornell University Press.
  • Fouquette MJ. 1975. Speciation in chorus frogs: I. Reproductive character displacement in the Pseudacris nigrita complex. Systematic Zoology 24: 16-23.
  • Frost DR. 2007. Amphibian species of the world: an online reference, Version 5.0. New York: American Museum of Natural History. Available at http://research.amnh.org/ herpetology/amphibia/index.php (1 February 2007).
  • Frost DR, Grant T, Faivovich J, Bain RH, Haas A, Haddad CFB, de Sa RO, Channing A, Wilkinson M, Donnellan SC, Raxworthy CJ, Campbell JA, Blotto BL, Moler P, Drewes RC, Nussbaum RA, Lynch JD, Green DM, Wheeler WC. 2006. The amphibian tree of life. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 297: 1-370.
  • Frost DR, Hillis DM. 1990. Species in concept and practice: Herpetological applications. Herpetologica 46: 87-104.
  • Fu J, Weadick CJ, Zeng X, Wang Y, Liu Z, Zheng Y, Li C, Hu Y. 2005. Phylogeographic analysis of the Bufo gargarizans species complex: a revisit. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 37: 202-213.
  • Gebauer A, Kaiser M, Wassmann C. 2006. Remarks on biology, vocalisations and systematics of Urocynchramus pylzowi Przewalski (Aves, Passeriformes). Zootaxa 1325: 75-98.
  • Gerhardt HC. 1982. Sound pattern recognition in some North American treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): Implications for mate choice. American Zoologist 22: 581-595.
  • Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270: 313-321.
  • Hey J, Waples RS, Arnold ML, Butlin RK, Harrison RG. 2003. Understanding and confronting species uncertainty in biology and conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 597-603.
  • Heyer WR. 1973. Systematics of the marmoratus group of the frog genus Leptodactylus (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae). Contributions in Science, Natural History Museum, Los Angeles County 251: 1-50.
  • Heyer WR. 1974. Relationships of the marmoratus species group (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae) within the subfamily Leptodactylinae. Contributions in Science, Natural History Museum, Los Angeles County 253: 1-46.
  • Heyer WR. 1975. Adenomera lutzi (Amphibia: Leptodactylidae), a new species of frog from Guyana. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 88: 315-318.
  • Heyer WR. 1984. The systematic status of Adenomera griseigularis Henle, with comments on systematic problems in the genus Adenomera (Amphibia: Leptodactylidae). Amphibia-Reptilia 5: 97-100.
  • Heyer WR, Garcia-Lopez JM, Cardoso AJ. 1996. Advertisement call variation in the Leptodactylus mystaceus species complex (Amphibia: Leptodactylidae) with a description of a new sibling species. Amphibia-Reptilia 17: 7-31.
  • Heyer WR, Rand AS, Cruz CAG, Peixoto OL, Nelson CE. 1990. Frogs of Boraceia. Arquivos de Zoologia 31: 230-410.
  • Heyer WR, Reid YR. 2003. Does advertisement call variation coincide with genetic variation in the genetically diverse frog taxon currently known as Leptodactylus fuscus (Amphibia: Leptodactylidae)? Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias 75: 39-54.
  • Huang Y, Orti G, Sutherlin M, Duhachek A, Zera A. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships of North American field crickets inferred from mitochondrial DNA data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 17: 48-57.
  • International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. 2000. International code of zoological nomenclature, 4th edn. London: The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature c/o The Natural History Museum.
  • IUCN. 2001. IUCN red list categories and criteria, Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. Gland: IUCN.
  • Johnson NK, Jones RE. 2001. A new species of tody-tyrant (Tyrannidae: Poecilotriccus) from Northern Peru. Auk 118: 334-341.
  • Keller E. 1994. Signalyze, Version 3.12. Lausanne: Infosignal Inc.
  • Kok PJR, Kokubum MNC, MacCulloch RD, Lathrop A. 2007. Morphological variation in Leptodactylus lutzi (Anura, Leptodactylidae) with description of its advertisement call and notes on its courtship behavior. Phyllomedusa 6: 45-60.
  • Kokubum MNC, Giaretta AA. 2005. Reproductive ecology and behaviour of a species of Adenomera (Anura, Leptodactylinae) with endotrophic tadpoles: Systematic implications. Journal of Natural History 39: 1745-1758.
  • Kwet A. 2007. Bioacoustic variation in the genus Adenomera in southern Brazil, with revalidation of Leptodactylus Nanus Muller, 1922 (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Mitteilungen aus dem Museum fur Naturkunde in Berlin, Zoologische Reihe Supplement 83: 56-68. doi:10.1002/mmnz.200600027
  • Kwet A, Angulo A. 2002. A new species of Adenomera (Anura, Leptodactylidae) from the Araucaria forest of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil), with comments on the systematic status of southern populations of the genus. Alytes 20: 28-43.
  • Lutz A. 1931. Sur la biologie des batraciens du Bresil. Comptes Rendus de la Societe de Biologie, Paris 109: 755-756.
  • Lutz B. 1947. Trends towards non-aquatic and direct development in frogs. Copeia 1947: 242-252.
  • Marquez R, De la Riva I, Bosch J. 1995. Advertisement calls of Bolivian Leptodactylidae (Amphibia, Anura). Journal of Zoology, London 237: 313-336.
  • Marquez R, De la Riva I, Bosch J, Matheu E. 2002. Sounds of frogs and toads of Bolivia. Barcelona: Alosa, sonidos de la naturaleza.
  • Mayden RL. 1997. A hierarchy of species concepts: the denouement in the saga of the species problem. In: Claridge MF, Dawah HA, Wilson MR, eds. Species: the units of biodiversity. New York: Chapman & Hall, 381-424.
  • Mayr E. 1984. Species concepts and their application. In: Sober E, ed. Conceptual issues in evolutionary biology: an anthology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 531-540.
  • Muller L. 1923. Neue oder seltene Reptilien und Batrachier der Zoologischen Sammlung des bayr. Staates. Zoologischen Anzeiger 57: 39-54.
  • Nicholls JA, Austin JJ, Moritz C, Goldizen AW. 2006. Genetic population structure and call variation in a passerine bird, the satin bowerbird, Ptilonorhynchus violaceus. Evolution 60: 1279-1290.
  • Otte D. 1989. Speciation in Hawaiian Crickets. In: Otte D, Endler JA, eds. Speciation and its consequences. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, 482-526.
  • Otte D, Alexander RD. 1983. The Australian crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Monograph 22, The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia.
  • Packert M. 2006. Song dialects as diagnostic characters - acoustic differentiation of the Canary Island Goldcrest subspecies Regulus regulus teneriffae Seebohm 1883 and R. r. ellenthalerae Packert et al. 2006 (Aves: Passeriformes: Regulidae). Zootaxa 1325: 99-115.
  • Paterson HEH. 1993. Evolution and the recognition concept of species: collected writings. McEvey SF, ed. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Pigliucci M. 2003. Species as family resemblance concepts: the (dis-)solution of the species problem? Bioessays 25: 596- 602.
  • Ponssa ML, Heyer WR. 2007. Osteological characterization of four putative species of the genus Adenomera (Anura: Leptodactylidae), with comments on intra- and interspecific variation. Zootaxa 1403: 37-54.
  • de Queiroz K. 1998. The general lineage concept of species, species criteria, and the process of speciation: a conceptual unification and terminological recommendations. In: Howard DJ, Berlocher SH, eds. Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 57-75.
  • de Queiroz K. 1999. The general lineage concept of species and the defining properties of the species category. In: Wilson RA, ed. Species: new interdisciplinary essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 49-89.
  • de Queiroz K. 2005. A unified concept of species and its consequences for the future of taxonomy. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 56: 196-215.
  • Rand AS. 1985. Tradeoffs in the evolution of frog calls. Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences (Animal Sciences) 94: 623-637.
  • Reichle S, Lotters S, De la Riva I. 2001. A new species of the discoidalis group of Eleutherodactylus (Anura, Leptodactylidae) from Inner-Andean Dry Valleys of Bolivia. Journal of Herpetology 35: 21-26.
  • Ron SR, Santos JC, Cannatella DC. 2006. Phylogeny of the tungara frog genus Engystomops (=Physalaemus pustulosus species group; Anura: Leptodactylidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 39: 392-403.
  • Ryan MJ. 1988. Constraints and patterns in the evolution of anuran acoustic communication. In: Fritzsch B, Ryan MJ, Wilczynski W, Hetherington TE, Walkoviak W, eds. The evolution of the amphibian auditory system. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 637-677.
  • Ryan MJ, Cocroft RB, Wilczynski W. 1990. The role of environmental selection in intraspecific divergence of mate recognition signals in the cricket frog, Acris crepitans. Evolution 44: 1869-1872.
  • Ryan MJ, Rand AS. 1993. Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution 47: 647-657.
  • Schluter A. 1980. Bio-akustische Untersuchungen an Leptodactyliden in einem begrenzten Gebiet des tropischen Regenwaldes von Peru (Amphibia: Salientia: Leptodactylidae). Salamandra 16: 227-247.
  • Schneider H, Joermann G, Hodl W. 1988. Calling and antiphonal calling in four Neotropical anuran species of the family Leptodactylidae. Zoologische Jahrbucher Abteilung fur Allgemeine Zoologie und Physiologie der Tiere 92: 77-103.
  • Shaw KL. 1996a. Sequential radiations and patterns of speciation in the Hawaiian cricket genus Laupala inferred from DNA sequences. Evolution 50: 237-255.
  • Shaw KL. 1996b. Polygenic inheritance of a behavioral phenotype: interspecific genetics of song in the Hawaiian cricket genus Laupala. Evolution 50: 256-266.
  • Shaw KL. 2000. Further acoustic diversity in Hawaiian forests: two new species of Hawaiian cricket (Orthoptera: Gryllidae: Trigonidiinae: Laupala). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 129: 73-91.
  • Simpson GG. 1961. Principles of animal taxonomy. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Slabbekoorn H, Smith TB. 2002a. Bird song, ecology and speciation. Philosophical Transactions Royal Society of London B 357: 493-503.
  • Slabbekoorn H, Smith TB. 2002b. Habitat-dependent song divergence in the little greenbul: an analysis of environmental selection pressures on acoustic signals. Evolution 56: 1849-1858.
  • Stamos DN. 2003. The species problem: biological species, ontology, and the metaphysics of biology. Lanham: Lexinton Books.
  • Straughan IR, Heyer WR. 1976. A functional analysis of the mating calls of the Neotropical frog genera of the Leptodactylus complex (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae). Papeis Avulsos de Zoologia, Sao Paulo 29: 221-245.
  • Templeton AR. 1989. The meaning of species and speciation: a genetic perspective. In: Otte D, Endler JA, eds. Speciation and its consequences. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, 3-27.
  • Wells MM, Henry CS. 1998. Songs, reproductive isolation, and speciation in cryptic species of insects: a case study using green lacewings. In: Howard DJ, Berlocher SH, eds. Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 217-233.
  • Zimmerman BL, Bogart JP. 1984. Vocalizations of primary forest frog species in the central Amazon. Acta Amazonica 14: 473-519.