Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published October 31, 2004 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Revising the definition of the crustacean seta and setal classification systems based on examinations of the mouthpart setae of seven species of decapods

Authors/Creators

Description

Garm, A. (2004): Revising the definition of the crustacean seta and setal classification systems based on examinations of the mouthpart setae of seven species of decapods. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 142 (2): 233-252, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2004.00132.x, URL: https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article-lookup/doi/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2004.00132.x

Files

source.pdf

Files (1.2 MB)

Name Size
md5:97d821574cff3dd466bc0900c7fd7262
1.2 MB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FFD82157FFFFFFD4FFBC0900FFFD7262

Has part
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5113411 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.4634600 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5113413 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.4634602 (DOI)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/DF37B8B1FFF8FFD3FF2709C5FC9672BA (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.4634606 (DOI)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/DF37B8B1FFF7FFDCFF3208FCFD4C7073 (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.4634608 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.4634612 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.4634614 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.4634618 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.4634622 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.4634624 (DOI)

References

  • Alexander CG, Hindley JPR, Jones SG. 1980. Structure and function of the third maxillipeds of the banana prawn Penaeus merguiensis. Marine Biology 58: 245-249.
  • Altner I, Hatt H, Altner H. 1983. Structural properties of bimodal chemo- and mechanosensitive setae on the pereiopod chelae of the crayfish, Austropotamobius torrentium. Cell and Tissue Research 228: 357-374.
  • Altner H, Hatt H, Altner I. 1986. Structural and functional properties of the mechanoreceptors and chemoreceptors in the anterior oesophageal sensilla of the crayfish, Astacus astacus. Cell and Tissue Research 244: 537-547.
  • Anderson A. 1975. The ultrastructure of the presumed chemoreceptor aesthetasc 'Y' of a cypridid ostracod. Zoologica Scripta 4: 151-158.
  • Berge J. 2001. Revision of Stegosoladidus Barnard and Karaman, 1987 (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Stegocephalidae), redescription of two species and description of three new species. Journal of Natural History 35: 539-571.
  • Brandt A. 1988. Morphology and ultrastructure of the sensory spine, a presumed mechanoreceptor of Sphaeroma hookeri (Crustacea, Isopoda), and remarks on similar spines in other pericarids. Journal of Morphology 198: 219-229.
  • Cals P, Cals-Usciati J. 1986. Distinction des diverses categories fonctionnelles de megasetes chez Thermosbaena mirabilis (crustace), en fonction du concept de compartimentation cellulaire. Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences Serie III Sciences de la Vie 303: 459-464.
  • Coelho VR, Williams AB, Rodrigues SA. 2000. Trophic strategies and functional morphology of feeding appendages, with emphasis on setae of Upogebia omissa and Pomatogebia operculata (Decapoda: Thalassinidea: Upogebiidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 130: 567-602.
  • Crouau Y. 1989. Feeding mechanisms of the Mysidacea. In: Felgenhauer B, Watling L, Thistle AB, eds. Functional morphology of feeding and grooming in Crustacea. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema, 153-172.
  • Crouau Y. 1997. Comparison of crustacean and insect mechanoreceptive setae. International Journal of Insect Morphology and Embryology 26: 181-190.
  • Derby CD. 1982. Structure and function of cuticular sensilla of the lobster Homarus americanus. Journal of Crustacean Biology 2: 1-21.
  • Derby CD. 1989. Physiology of sensory neurons in morphologically identified cuticular sensilla of crustaceans. In: Felgenhauer, B, Watling, L, Thistle, A, eds. Functional morphology of feeding and grooming in Crustacea. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema, 27-48.
  • Derby CD. 2000. Learning from spiny lobsters about chemosensory coding of mixtures. Physiology and Behavior 69: 203-209.
  • Derby CD, Steullet P, Horner AJ, Cate HS. 2001. The sensory basis of feeding behaviour in the Caribbean spiny lobster, Panulirus argus. Marine and Freshwater Research 52: 1339-1350.
  • Elofsson R, Hessler RR. 1991. Sensory morphology in the antennae of the cephalocarid Hutchinsoniella macracantha. Journal of Crustacean Biology 11: 345-355.
  • Elofsson R, Hessler RR. 1994. Sensory structures associated with the body cuticle of Hutchinsoniella macracantha (Cephalocarida). Journal of Crustacean Biology 14: 454-462.
  • Factor JR. 1978. Morphology of the mouthparts of larval lobsters, Homarus americanus (Decapoda: Nephrophidae), with special emphasis on their setae. Biological Bulletin 154: 383-408.
  • Farmer AS. 1974. The functional morphology of the mouthparts and pereiopods of Nephrops norvegicus (L.) (Decapoda: Nephropide). Journal of Natural History 8: 121-142.
  • Fish S. 1972. The setae of Eurydice pulchra (Crustacea: Isopoda). Journal of Zoology 166: 163-177.
  • Fontaine MT, Passelecq-gerin E, Bauchau AG. 1984. Structures chemoreceptrices des antennules du crabe Carcinus maenas (L.) (Decapoda: Brachyura). Crustaceana-Leiden 43: 271-283.
  • Garm A. 2004. Mechanical functions of setae from the mouth apparatus of seven species of decapod crustaceans. Journal of Morphology 260: 85-100.
  • Garm A, Hoeg JT. 2000. Functional mouthpart morphology of the squat lobster Munida sarsi, with comparison to other anomurans. Marine Biology 137: 123-138.
  • Garm A, Hoeg JT. 2001. Function and functional groupings of the complex mouth apparatus of the squat lobsters Munida sarsi Huus and M. tenuimana G.O. Sars (Crustacea: Decapoda). Biological Bulletin 200: 281-297.
  • Garm A, Hallberg E, Hoeg JT. 2003. The role of maxilla 2 and its setae during feeding in the shrimp Palaemon adspersus (Crustacea: Decapoda). Biological Bulletin 204: 126-137.
  • Ghiradella H, Case J, Cronshaw J. 1968a. Fine structure of the aesthetasc hairs of Coenobita compressus Edwards. Journal of Morphology 124: 361-386.
  • Ghiradella H, Case J, Cronshaw J. 1968b. Structure of aesthetascs in selected marine and terrestrial decapods: chemoreceptor morphology and environment. American Zoologist 8: 621.
  • Guse GW. 1980. Development of antennal sensilla during moulting in Neomysis integer (Leach) (Crustacea, Mysidacea). Protoplasma 105: 53-67.
  • Halcrow K, Bousfield EL. 1987. Scanning electron microscopy of surface microstructures of some gammaridean amphipod crustaceans. Journal of Crustacean Biology 7: 274-287.
  • Hallberg E, Johansson KUI, Elofsson R. 1992. The aesthetasc concept: structural variations of putative olfactory receptor cell complexes in Crustacea. Microscopy Research and Technique 22: 325-335.
  • Harrison PJH, Cate HS, Steullet P, Derby CD. 2001. Structural plasticity in the olfactory system of adult spiny lobsters: postembryonic development permits life-long growth, turnover, and regeneration. Marine and Freshwater Research 52: 1357-1365.
  • Hoeg JT, Karnick ES, Frolander A. 1994. Scanning electron microscopy of mouth appendages in six species of barnacles (Crustacea: Cirripedia: Thoracica). Acta Zoologica 75: 337-357.
  • Holmquist JG. 1989. Grooming structure and function in some terrestrial Crustacea. In: Felgenhauer B, Watling L, Thistle AB, eds. Functional morphology of feeding and grooming in Crustacea. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema, 95- 114.
  • Hunt MJ, Winsor H, Alexander CG. 1992. Feeding by the penaeid prawns: the role of the anterior mouthparts. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 160: 33-46.
  • Huys R, Boxshall GA. 1991. Copepod evolution. London: The Ray Society.
  • Jacques F. 1981. Systeme setifere des maxillipedes de Squilla mantis (Crustacea, Stomatopoda): morphologie functionnelle. Zoomorphology 98: 233-239.
  • Johansson KUI, Gefors L, Wallen R, Hallberg E. 1996. Structure and distribution patterns of aesthetascs and male specific sensilla in Lophogaster typicus (Mysidacea). Journal of Crustacean Biology 16: 45-53.
  • Johnston DJ. 1999. Functional morphology of the mouthparts and alimentary tract of the slipper lobster Thenus orientalis (Decapoda: Scyllaridae). Marine and Freshwater Research 50: 213-223.
  • Kaim-Malka RA, Maebe S, Macquart-Moulin C, Bezac C. 1999. Antennal sense organs of Natatolana borealis (Lilljeborg 1851) (Crustacea: Isopoda). Journal of Natural History 33: 65-88.
  • Kaufmann RS. 1994. Structure and function of chemoreceptors in scavenging lysianassoid amphipods. Journal of Crustacean Biology 14: 54-71.
  • Keil TA. 1997. Comparative morphogenesis of sensilla: a review. International Journal of Insect Morphology and Embryology 26: 151-160.
  • Lagersson NC, Garm A, Hoeg JT. 2003. Notes on the ultrastructure of the setae on the fourth antennulary segment of the Balanus amphritrite cyprid (Crustacea: Cirripedia: Thoracica). Journal of the Marine Biological Association, UK 83: 361-365.
  • Lavalli KL, Factor JR. 1992. Functional morphology of the mouthparts of juvenile lobsters, Homarus americanus (Decapoda: Nephropidae), and comparison with the larval stages. Journal of Crustacean Biology 12: 467-510.
  • Loya-Javellana GN, Fielder DR. 1997. Developmental trends in the mouthparts during growth from juvenile to adults of the tropic freshwater crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus von Martens, 1868 (Decapoda: Paraastacidae). Invertebrate Reproduction and Development 32: 167-175.
  • Martin JW. 1989. Morphology of the feding structures in the Conchostraca with special reference to Lynceus. In: Felgenhauer B, Watling L, Thistle AB, eds. Functional morphology of feeding and grooming in Crustacea. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema, 123-136.
  • Matsuura H, Nishida S. 2000. Fine structure of the 'button setae' in the deep-sea pelagic copepods of the genus Euaugaptilus (Calanoida: Augaptilidae). Marine Biology 137: 339-345.
  • Muller KJ, Walossek D. 1987. Morphology, ontogeny, and life habit of Agnostus pisiformis from the upper Cambrian of Sweden. Fossils Strata 19: 1-124.
  • Newman WA, Ross A. 2001. Prospectus on larval cirriped setation formulae, revisited. Journal of Crustacean Biology 21: 56-77.
  • Nickell LA, Atkinson JA, Pinn EH. 1998. Morphology of thalassinidean (Crustacea: Decapoda) mouthparts and pereiopods in relation to feeding, ecology and grooming. Journal of Natural History 32: 733-761.
  • Nielsen SO, Stromberg JO. 1973. Surface structure of aesthetascs in Cryptoniscina (Isopoda Epicaridea). Sarsia 52: 59-74.
  • Paffenhofer GA, Loyd PA. 1999. Ultrastructure of the setae of the maxilliped of the marine planktonic copepod Temora stylifera. Marine Ecology Progress Series 178: 101-107.
  • Paffenhofer GA, Loyd PA. 2000. Ultrastructure of cephalic appendages setae of marine planktonic copepods. Marine Ecology Progress Series 203: 171-180.
  • Pinn EH, Nickell LA, Rogerson A, Atkinson JA. 1999. Comparison of the mouthpart setal fringes of seven species of mud-shrimps (Crustacea: Decapoda: Thalassinidea). Journal of Natural History 33: 1461-1485.
  • Pohle G. 1989. Gill and embryo grooming in lithodid crabs: Comparative functional morphology based on Lithodes maja. In: Felgenhauer B, Watling L, Thistle AB, eds. Functional morphology of feeding and grooming in Crustacea. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema, 75-94.
  • Pohle G, Telford M. 1981. Morphology and classification of decapod crustacean larval setae: a scanning electron microscopy study of Disodactylus crinitichelis Moreira, 1901 (Brachyura: Pinnotheridae). Bulletin of Marine Science 31: 736-752.
  • Reaka ML. 1974. Molting in stomatopod Crustaceans. 1. Stages of the molt cycle, setagenesis, and morphology. Journal of Morphology 146: 55-80.
  • Rieder N. 1978. Die Ultrastruktur der Rezeptoren auf den ersten Antennen von Daphnia magna. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft 71: 1-299.
  • Rieder N. 1980. Die receptoren an den ersten Antennen von Leptestheria dahalacensis Ruppel (Crustacea, Conchostraca). Zoomorphologie 95: 169-179.
  • Risler H. 1977. Die Sinnesorgane der Antennula von Porcellio scaber Latr. (Crustacea, Isopoda). Zoologische Jahrbucher Abteilung fur Anatomie und Ontogenie der Tiere 98: 29-52.
  • Schembri PJ. 1982a. Functional morphology of the mouthparts and associated structures of Pagurus rubricatus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura) with special reference to feeding and grooming. Zoomorphology 101: 17-38.
  • Schembri PJ. 1982b. The functional morphology of the feeding and grooming appendages of Ebalia tuberosa (Pennant) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Leucosiidae). Journal of Natural History 16: 467-480.
  • Schram FR, Lewis CA. 1989. Functional morphology of feeding in the Nectiopoda. In: Felgenhauer B, Watling L, Thistle AB, eds. Functional morphology of feeding and grooming in Crustacea. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema, 115-122.
  • Shelton RGJ, Laverack MS. 1970. Receptor hair structure and function in the lobster Homarus gammarus (L.). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 4: 201-210.
  • Snow PJ. 1973. Ultrastructure of the aesthetasc hairs of the littoral decapod, Paragrapsus gaimardii. Zeitschrift fur Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie 138: 489- 502.
  • Spencer M. 1986. The innervation and chemical sensitivity of single aesthetasc hairs. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 158: 59-68.
  • Stemhuis EJ, Dauwe B, Videler JJ. 1998. How to bite the dust: morphology, motion pattern and function of the feeding appendages of the deposit-feeding thalassinid shrimp Callianassa subterranea. Marine Biology 132: 43-58.
  • Steullet P, Cate HS, Michel WC, Derby CD. 2000. Functional units of a compound nose: aesthetasc sensilla house similar populations of olfactory receptor neurons on the crustacean antennule. Journal of Comparative Neurology 418: 270-280.
  • Thomas WJ. 1970. The setae of Austropotamobius pallipes (Crustacea: Astacidae). Journal of Zoology 160: 91-142.
  • Thompson H, Ache BW. 1980. Threshold determination for olfactory receptors of the spiny lobster. Marine Behaviour and Physiology 7: 249-260.
  • Tierny AJ, Thompson CS, Dunham DW. 1986. Fine structure of aesthetasc chemoreceptors in the crayfish Orconectes propinquus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 64: 392-399.
  • Vannier J, Abe K, Ikuta K. 1998. Feeding in myodocopid ostracods: functional morphology and laboratory observations from videos. Marine Biology 132: 391-408.
  • Vedel JP, Clarac F. 1976. Hydrodynamic sensitivity by cuticular organs in the rock lobster Panulirus vulgaris. Morphological and physiological aspects. Marine Behaviour and Physiology 3: 235-251.
  • Voigt R, Atema J. 1992. Tuning of chemoreceptor cells of the second antenna of American lobster (Homarus americanus) with a comparison of four of its other chemoreceptor organs. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 171: 673-683.
  • Walossek D. 1993. The upper cambrian Rehbachiella and the phylogeny of Branchiopoda and Crustacea. Fossils Strata 32: 1-202.
  • Watling L. 1989. A classification system for crustacean setae based on the homology concept. In: Felgenhauer B, Watling L, Thistle AB, eds. Functional morphology of feeding and grooming in Crustacea. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema, 15-26.